ISUS-X, Tenth Conference of the International Society for Utilitarian Studies
Parent: Kadish Center for Morality, Law and Public Affairs
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for September through December, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1dx0q392 | "The Principles of Asceticism and Sympathy and Antipathy in Patterns of Abuse" | 416 | 4 | 412 | 1.0% |
| 7pp5z07p | “Two Utilitarian Approaches to Human Rights” | 266 | 14 | 252 | 5.3% |
| 1gx7m9vb | "Bentham's Three 'Rules of Moral Duty'" | 228 | 4 | 224 | 1.8% |
| 728530mb | "Mill’s Conception of Human Rights" | 209 | 204 | 5 | 97.6% |
| 2jw5z4f1 | "Amartya Sen's Misleading Conception of Utilitarianism" | 142 | 13 | 129 | 9.2% |
| 4zn812s7 | “From Utilitarianism To Kantism: Bentham’s Proof of Utilitarianism, Mill and Kant” | 90 | 21 | 69 | 23.3% |
| 1gq9w0hw | "Utilitarianism and Dewey’s 'Three Independent Factors in Morals'” | 78 | 7 | 71 | 9.0% |
| 8b9346zx | "Non-consequentialist Utilitarianism" | 67 | 7 | 60 | 10.4% |
| 0fc4j78x | “Mill’s Extraordinary Utilitarian Moral Theory” | 58 | 11 | 47 | 19.0% |
| 3r95842n | Consequentialism and Moral Responsibility | 54 | 14 | 40 | 25.9% |
| 9d71b30h | "Interpreting Mill" | 51 | 2 | 49 | 3.9% |
| 715593qn | “José del Valle: a Benthamite in Central America” | 38 | 3 | 35 | 7.9% |
| 3q11q6vr | Political and Philosophical Radicalism: The place of the utility principle in Jeremy Bentham's Early writings on critical jurisprudence. | 36 | 8 | 28 | 22.2% |
| 58b08022 | "Murphy’s Collective Principle of Beneficence" | 34 | 1 | 33 | 2.9% |
| 7h5852rr | "Moral Uncertainty and the Principle of Equity among Moral Theories" | 34 | 15 | 19 | 44.1% |
| 985467q3 | "The Reception of Peter Singer’s Theories in France" | 34 | 3 | 31 | 8.8% |
| 9rx2c09v | "The Utilitarian Influence on American Legal Science in the Early Republic" | 31 | 2 | 29 | 6.5% |
| 216255vs | “The Problem of Well-Being: Respect, Equality, and the Self” | 29 | 9 | 20 | 31.0% |
| 1f66d6j5 | "The Cooperation Argument for Fairness in International Trade" | 28 | 12 | 16 | 42.9% |
| 0fz4x35q | "Utilitarian Political Economy, Natural Rights and the Poor" | 23 | 9 | 14 | 39.1% |
| 30d818rq | “What the Utilitarian Cannot Think” | 23 | 6 | 17 | 26.1% |
| 8d59f306 | "Happiness, Well-Being, and William Thompson’s Social(ist) Utilitarianism" | 20 | 6 | 14 | 30.0% |
| 8vc0r9ct | “Can Consequentialization Advance the Cause of Consequentialism?” | 20 | 3 | 17 | 15.0% |
| 3462f75h | "The Self-Preference Principle: Bentham’s Transition to Epistemological and Democratic Radicalism" | 19 | 3 | 16 | 15.8% |
| 0qk7c30w | "How Not to Argue for Rule-Consequentialism" | 18 | 2 | 16 | 11.1% |
| 4g22f239 | “Consequentialism, Time, and Value” | 18 | 5 | 13 | 27.8% |
| 6ms0x8xj | “The Consequences of Rejecting the Moral Relevance of the Doing-allowing Distinction" | 18 | 5 | 13 | 27.8% |
| 1k19j8w9 | "The Teleological Conception of Practical Reasons" | 17 | 5 | 12 | 29.4% |
| 7qn994ct | "Patron-Client Relationships in the Radical Enlightenment" | 17 | 5 | 12 | 29.4% |
| 88w4c1mr | "How To Be a Consequentialist About Everything" | 17 | 10 | 7 | 58.8% |
| 16r6s19t | "Mass Atrocities, Retributivism, and the Threshold Challenge" | 16 | 5 | 11 | 31.3% |
| 4rb3n46k | “Leveling the Playing Field: Equality of Opportunity and Counterfactual Responsibility” | 16 | 3 | 13 | 18.8% |
| 4sv6q775 | Consequentialism in Transition | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% |
| 5pq206bx | "Defending the Dualism of the Practical Reason Against Parfit’s" | 14 | 3 | 11 | 21.4% |
| 3d40m6nq | "The Asymmetry Argument" | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% |
| 58r6d1bs | "Reconciling Consequentialism with Ordinary Moral Knowledge" | 12 | 2 | 10 | 16.7% |
| 67c2s2zq | "Utility, Determinism, and Possibility: Context to the Rescue" | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% |
| 8bp853f8 | “How Politicians Mislead Us; Jeremy Bentham on Political Fallacies” | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% |
| 2fn0j5rp | "Utilitarian Adjudication" | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% |
| 64w666m6 | "Can There Be a Utilitarian Theory of the Reactive Attitudes" | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% |
| 67t3n3z8 | “Intentions and Moral Permissibility” | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.