Department of Philosophy
Parent: UC Berkeley
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for April through July, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9ts1b228 | Possibility Semantics | 209 | 43 | 166 | 20.6% |
| 2vp2x4rx | A Semantic Hierarchy for Intuitionistic Logic | 193 | 30 | 163 | 15.5% |
| 82w2d085 | Simplifying the Surprise Exam | 125 | 28 | 97 | 22.4% |
| 9hd0g86c | Arrow's Decisive Coalitions | 118 | 23 | 95 | 19.5% |
| 27k2f44p | Another Problem in Possible World Semantics | 102 | 24 | 78 | 23.5% |
| 1m3156ps | Logics of Imprecise Comparative Probability | 87 | 19 | 68 | 21.8% |
| 5jw0p2mz | Axiomatization in the Meaning Sciences | 75 | 21 | 54 | 28.0% |
| 4f11t8k3 | School in the time of Covid | 70 | 11 | 59 | 15.7% |
| 6xq0f176 | Reply | 69 | 4 | 65 | 5.8% |
| 7kr412rz | Trust, anger, resentment, forgiveness: On blame and its reasons | 68 | 19 | 49 | 27.9% |
| 2g73d7qv | Voting Theory in the Lean Theorem Prover | 61 | 12 | 49 | 19.7% |
| 0379725f | On the Modal Logic of Subset and Superset: Tense Logic over Medvedev Frames | 58 | 28 | 30 | 48.3% |
| 2152w8k6 | Epistemic Closure and Epistemic Logic I: Relevant Alternatives and Subjunctivism | 58 | 11 | 47 | 19.0% |
| 9v11r0dq | Possibility Frames and Forcing for Modal Logic (June 2016) | 55 | 7 | 48 | 12.7% |
| 46r5502v | A note on Murakami’s theorems and incomplete social choice without the Pareto principle | 54 | 16 | 38 | 29.6% |
| 2nn3c35x | The Logic of Comparative Cardinality | 53 | 10 | 43 | 18.9% |
| 46w023hs | One Modal Logic to Rule Them All? | 46 | 5 | 41 | 10.9% |
| 69f4t1wg | Algebraic and topological semantics for inquisitive logic via choice-free duality | 46 | 7 | 39 | 15.2% |
| 6w21t4jn | Inquisitive Intuitionistic Logic | 46 | 14 | 32 | 30.4% |
| 303338xr | A Note on Algebraic Semantics for S5 with Propositional Quantifiers | 45 | 15 | 30 | 33.3% |
| 4w2083v3 | Three roads to complete lattices: orders, compatibility, polarity | 40 | 10 | 30 | 25.0% |
| 0ss5z8g3 | The Orthologic of Epistemic Modals | 39 | 12 | 27 | 30.8% |
| 57q7t509 | Compatibility, compossibility, and epistemic modality | 39 | 8 | 31 | 20.5% |
| 2h5069pq | A Bimodal Perspective on Possibility Semantics | 38 | 15 | 23 | 39.5% |
| 37z3r3t4 | Split Cycle: A New Condorcet Consistent Voting Method Independent of Clones and Immune to Spoilers | 37 | 10 | 27 | 27.0% |
| 5039n29t | A partial-state space model of unawareness | 36 | 11 | 25 | 30.6% |
| 2s0134zx | Locales, Nuclei, and Dragalin Frames | 34 | 7 | 27 | 20.6% |
| 00p6t2v4 | Choice-free Stone duality | 32 | 3 | 29 | 9.4% |
| 7gr812wb | I—Vagueness as Indecision | 31 | 13 | 18 | 41.9% |
| 01p9x1hv | Complete Additivity and Modal Incompleteness | 30 | 6 | 24 | 20.0% |
| 8br2b074 | Inferring Probability Comparisons | 30 | 4 | 26 | 13.3% |
| 07v9360j | One Modal Logic to Rule Them All? (Extended Technical Report) | 29 | 6 | 23 | 20.7% |
| 5462j5b6 | Possibility Frames and Forcing for Modal Logic | 28 | 14 | 14 | 50.0% |
| 91f717px | Fallibilism and Multiple Paths to Knowledge (Extended Version) | 28 | 12 | 16 | 42.9% |
| 9pm9t4vp | Partiality and Adjointness in Modal Logic | 28 | 11 | 17 | 39.3% |
| 2sf7x271 | A note on cancellation axioms for comparative probability | 27 | 12 | 15 | 44.4% |
| 11c0x4n5 | Figure and Ground in Logical Space | 26 | 12 | 14 | 46.2% |
| 4z83s9z9 | Compatibility and accessibility: lattice representations for semantics of non-classical and modal logics | 25 | 7 | 18 | 28.0% |
| 40c139d1 | Preferential Structures for Comparative Probabilistic Reasoning | 22 | 4 | 18 | 18.2% |
| 4rc8v84j | Replies to Raffman, Stanley, and Wright | 22 | 10 | 12 | 45.5% |
| 64k4m60p | On Probabilistic Knowledge | 19 | 9 | 10 | 47.4% |
| 8pp4d94t | Complete Additivity and Modal Incompleteness | 18 | 7 | 11 | 38.9% |
| 8bp759nc | A fundamental non-classical logic | 17 | 2 | 15 | 11.8% |
| 1365c3jb | Measure semantics and qualitative semantics for epistemic modals | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% |
| 1722x1tx | Précis of The View from Here | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% |
| 7sc8x8c4 | Indicative Conditionals and Dynamic Epistemic Logic | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% |
| 4wh0c3br | Replies to Symposiasts on The View from Here | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% |
Disclaimer: due to the evolving nature of the web traffic we receive and the methods we use to collate it, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision.