Recent Work
Parent: Center for the Study of Energy Markets
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for March through June, 2025
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3ws6r3j4 | The Market Value and Cost of Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Production | 299 | 31 | 268 | 10.4% |
| 11w8d6m4 | Dynamic Pricing, Advanced Metering, and Demand Response in Electricity Markets | 274 | 72 | 202 | 26.3% |
| 4pd8s3h1 | Does Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana | 200 | 19 | 181 | 9.5% |
| 2dk5g982 | The Economic Impacts of Climate Change: Evidence from Agricultural Profits and Random Fluctuations in Weather | 194 | 12 | 182 | 6.2% |
| 4bf4j0gw | Doing Well By Doing Good? Green Office Buildings | 182 | 36 | 146 | 19.8% |
| 3d8252zp | Does Extending Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from an Australian Experiment | 171 | 15 | 156 | 8.8% |
| 3td3n1x1 | Residential Customer Response to Real-time Pricing: The Anaheim Critical Peak Pricing Experiment | 126 | 21 | 105 | 16.7% |
| 74s774zj | Clearing the Air? The Effects of Gasoline Content Regulation on Air Quality | 116 | 10 | 106 | 8.6% |
| 2159m46p | Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market | 114 | 20 | 94 | 17.5% |
| 86m171mn | Evidence of a Shift in the Short-Run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand | 99 | 9 | 90 | 9.1% |
| 7vq1m8mq | Market Power in California's Gasoline Market | 91 | 6 | 85 | 6.6% |
| 6f1378jg | The Economic Effects of Vintage Differentiated Regulations: The Case of New Source Review | 86 | 51 | 35 | 59.3% |
| 9tk2c4s9 | Electricity Rate Structures and the Economics of Solar PV: Could Mandatory Time-of-Use Rates Undermine California’s Solar Photovoltaic Subsidies? | 85 | 11 | 74 | 12.9% |
| 0mx44472 | Speculative Trading and Market Performance: The Effect of Arbitrageurs on Efficiency and Market Power in the New York Electricity Market | 79 | 10 | 69 | 12.7% |
| 3sr1h8nc | Equity Effects of Increasing-Block Electricity Pricing | 76 | 18 | 58 | 23.7% |
| 2k54m0zk | On the Efficiency of Competitive Electricity Markets With Time-Invariant Retail Prices | 73 | 3 | 70 | 4.1% |
| 53q5q8rs | Taxes and Trading versus Intensity Standards: Second-Best Environmental Policies with Incomplete Regulation (Leakage) or Market Power | 73 | 8 | 65 | 11.0% |
| 9dt8n4w3 | When to Pollute, When to Abate? Intertemporal Permit Use in the Los Angeles NOx Market | 67 | 48 | 19 | 71.6% |
| 09v4k44b | Towards a Sustainable Energy Balance: Progressive Efficiency and the Return of Energy Conservation | 65 | 6 | 59 | 9.2% |
| 27r2k4nf | Explaining the Price of Voluntary Carbon Offsets | 65 | 13 | 52 | 20.0% |
| 9241c68t | Market Structure and Competition: A Cross-Market Analysis of U.S. Electricity Deregulation | 65 | 14 | 51 | 21.5% |
| 5x5543dg | An Equilibrium Model of Investment in Restructured Electricity Markets | 64 | 36 | 28 | 56.3% |
| 8dv5c0t1 | Ownership Change, Incentives and Plant Efficiency: The Divestiture of U.S. Electric Generation Plants | 64 | 20 | 44 | 31.3% |
| 7p0168sp | What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California’s NOx Trading Program | 62 | 10 | 52 | 16.1% |
| 34c206t9 | The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing | 61 | 9 | 52 | 14.8% |
| 9s75171w | California's Electricity Crisis: A Market Apart? | 61 | 10 | 51 | 16.4% |
| 6dw241sv | Measuring Unilateral Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets: The California Market 1998 - 2000 | 60 | 6 | 54 | 10.0% |
| 50f4d8mr | Investment under Regulatory Uncertainty: U.S. Electricity Generation Investment Since 1996 | 59 | 26 | 33 | 44.1% |
| 7nm2f6sx | When it comes to Demand Response, is FERC its Own Worst Enemy? | 59 | 8 | 51 | 13.6% |
| 4cn02883 | Sacred Cars? Optimal Regulation of Stationary and Non-stationary Pollution Sources | 58 | 27 | 31 | 46.6% |
| 6266b54f | Asymmetric Price Adjustment and Consumer Search: An Examination of the Retail Gasoline Market | 58 | 10 | 48 | 17.2% |
| 2c96w6ff | From Investor-owned Utility to Independent Power Producer | 57 | 13 | 44 | 22.8% |
| 9xz9r2gm | The Implications of a Gasoline Price Floor for the California Budget and Greenhouse Gas Emissions | 57 | 6 | 51 | 10.5% |
| 5sf4m6rr | Retail Policies and Competition in the Gasoline Industry | 56 | 7 | 49 | 12.5% |
| 0h90r7k2 | Building Out Alternative Fuel Retail Infrastructure: Government Fleet Spillovers in E85 | 53 | 13 | 40 | 24.5% |
| 62n6k1qx | The 'Make or Buy' Decision in U.S. Electricity Generation Investments | 53 | 27 | 26 | 50.9% |
| 54c0f88g | Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Abatement | 52 | 5 | 47 | 9.6% |
| 9wp6969x | Is Real-Time Pricing Green?: The Environmental Impacts of Electricity Demand Variance | 52 | 6 | 46 | 11.5% |
| 1hj0983z | Demand-Side Management and Energy Efficiency Revisited | 51 | 10 | 41 | 19.6% |
| 9j05125d | Virtual Divestitures, Will They Make A Difference?: Cournot Competition, Options Markets and Efficiency | 51 | 29 | 22 | 56.9% |
| 09648358 | The Distributional and Environmental Effects of Time-Varying Prices in Competitive Electricity Markets | 49 | 2 | 47 | 4.1% |
| 3g9504bb | The Implied Cost of Carbon Dioxide under the Cash for Clunkers Program | 49 | 9 | 40 | 18.4% |
| 7z47d08n | Greenhouse Gas Reductions Under Low Carbon Fuel Standards? | 49 | 4 | 45 | 8.2% |
| 0v38t8r8 | Valuing the Time-Varying Electricity Production of Solar Photovoltaic Cells | 48 | 6 | 42 | 12.5% |
| 4vd3k3jt | The Length of Contracts and Collusion | 48 | 5 | 43 | 10.4% |
| 0128s4r3 | Lessons from International Experience with Electricity Market Monitoring | 47 | 5 | 42 | 10.6% |
| 26k8h7v9 | Vertical Integration in Restructured Electricity Markets: Measuring Market Efficiency and Firm Conduct | 47 | 8 | 39 | 17.0% |
| 2m41d45s | Do Americans Consume Too Little Natural Gas? An Empirical Test of Marginal Cost Pricing | 47 | 4 | 43 | 8.5% |
| 65h8p4sb | Cournot Competition, Financial Option Markets, and Efficiency | 47 | 5 | 42 | 10.6% |
| 8qx3z0x7 | Variation of Distribution Factors with Loading | 47 | 23 | 24 | 48.9% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.