Recent Work
Parent: Center for the Study of Energy Markets
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for April through July, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3ws6r3j4 | The Market Value and Cost of Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Production | 424 | 56 | 368 | 13.2% |
| 11w8d6m4 | Dynamic Pricing, Advanced Metering, and Demand Response in Electricity Markets | 337 | 104 | 233 | 30.9% |
| 4bf4j0gw | Doing Well By Doing Good? Green Office Buildings | 167 | 29 | 138 | 17.4% |
| 2dk5g982 | The Economic Impacts of Climate Change: Evidence from Agricultural Profits and Random Fluctuations in Weather | 153 | 14 | 139 | 9.2% |
| 4pd8s3h1 | Does Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana | 145 | 9 | 136 | 6.2% |
| 3d8252zp | Does Extending Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from an Australian Experiment | 118 | 21 | 97 | 17.8% |
| 7vq1m8mq | Market Power in California's Gasoline Market | 90 | 8 | 82 | 8.9% |
| 3sr1h8nc | Equity Effects of Increasing-Block Electricity Pricing | 76 | 26 | 50 | 34.2% |
| 3td3n1x1 | Residential Customer Response to Real-time Pricing: The Anaheim Critical Peak Pricing Experiment | 63 | 21 | 42 | 33.3% |
| 74s774zj | Clearing the Air? The Effects of Gasoline Content Regulation on Air Quality | 61 | 19 | 42 | 31.1% |
| 2159m46p | Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market | 59 | 25 | 34 | 42.4% |
| 53q5q8rs | Taxes and Trading versus Intensity Standards: Second-Best Environmental Policies with Incomplete Regulation (Leakage) or Market Power | 58 | 7 | 51 | 12.1% |
| 86m171mn | Evidence of a Shift in the Short-Run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand | 54 | 5 | 49 | 9.3% |
| 27r2k4nf | Explaining the Price of Voluntary Carbon Offsets | 51 | 21 | 30 | 41.2% |
| 09v4k44b | Towards a Sustainable Energy Balance: Progressive Efficiency and the Return of Energy Conservation | 46 | 16 | 30 | 34.8% |
| 34c206t9 | The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing | 44 | 11 | 33 | 25.0% |
| 0mx44472 | Speculative Trading and Market Performance: The Effect of Arbitrageurs on Efficiency and Market Power in the New York Electricity Market | 43 | 16 | 27 | 37.2% |
| 3qb650hh | Do Households Smooth Small Consumption Shocks? Evidence from Anticipated and Unanticipated Variation in Home Energy Costs | 42 | 6 | 36 | 14.3% |
| 6266b54f | Asymmetric Price Adjustment and Consumer Search: An Examination of the Retail Gasoline Market | 41 | 18 | 23 | 43.9% |
| 8dv5c0t1 | Ownership Change, Incentives and Plant Efficiency: The Divestiture of U.S. Electric Generation Plants | 41 | 13 | 28 | 31.7% |
| 9tk2c4s9 | Electricity Rate Structures and the Economics of Solar PV: Could Mandatory Time-of-Use Rates Undermine California’s Solar Photovoltaic Subsidies? | 41 | 10 | 31 | 24.4% |
| 6br429mf | Using Environmental Emissions Permit Prices to Raise Electricity Prices: Evidence from the California Electricity Market | 37 | 10 | 27 | 27.0% |
| 2k54m0zk | On the Efficiency of Competitive Electricity Markets With Time-Invariant Retail Prices | 35 | 11 | 24 | 31.4% |
| 7nm2f6sx | When it comes to Demand Response, is FERC its Own Worst Enemy? | 34 | 9 | 25 | 26.5% |
| 8913v4bk | An Empirical Assessment of the Competitiveness of the New England Electricity Market | 34 | 13 | 21 | 38.2% |
| 3zn6s6nf | Testing Strategic Models of Firm Behavior in Restructured Electricity Markets: A Case Study of ERCOT | 32 | 6 | 26 | 18.8% |
| 6m3355kj | California's Greenhouse Gas Policies: Local Solutions to a Global Problem? | 32 | 8 | 24 | 25.0% |
| 26k8h7v9 | Vertical Integration in Restructured Electricity Markets: Measuring Market Efficiency and Firm Conduct | 31 | 11 | 20 | 35.5% |
| 2c96w6ff | From Investor-owned Utility to Independent Power Producer | 31 | 8 | 23 | 25.8% |
| 54c0f88g | Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Abatement | 30 | 10 | 20 | 33.3% |
| 6dw241sv | Measuring Unilateral Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets: The California Market 1998 - 2000 | 30 | 7 | 23 | 23.3% |
| 3g9504bb | The Implied Cost of Carbon Dioxide under the Cash for Clunkers Program | 28 | 6 | 22 | 21.4% |
| 4dd7f3mq | Capacity Markets for Electricity | 28 | 9 | 19 | 32.1% |
| 8qx3z0x7 | Variation of Distribution Factors with Loading | 28 | 16 | 12 | 57.1% |
| 9241c68t | Market Structure and Competition: A Cross-Market Analysis of U.S. Electricity Deregulation | 28 | 8 | 20 | 28.6% |
| 5sf4m6rr | Retail Policies and Competition in the Gasoline Industry | 27 | 8 | 19 | 29.6% |
| 0v38t8r8 | Valuing the Time-Varying Electricity Production of Solar Photovoltaic Cells | 26 | 2 | 24 | 7.7% |
| 0128s4r3 | Lessons from International Experience with Electricity Market Monitoring | 24 | 6 | 18 | 25.0% |
| 1nn681tk | Climate Change, Mortality, and Adaptation: Evidence from Annual Fluctuations in Weather in the US | 24 | 14 | 10 | 58.3% |
| 3dh7v8bq | The Impact of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 on Electric Utilities and Coal Mines: Evidence from the Stock Market | 24 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% |
| 50f4d8mr | Investment under Regulatory Uncertainty: U.S. Electricity Generation Investment Since 1996 | 24 | 8 | 16 | 33.3% |
| 5dt476pc | Lessons from the California Electricity Crisis | 24 | 5 | 19 | 20.8% |
| 85k8w3k7 | The History of Electricity Restructuring in California | 24 | 5 | 19 | 20.8% |
| 09648358 | The Distributional and Environmental Effects of Time-Varying Prices in Competitive Electricity Markets | 23 | 11 | 12 | 47.8% |
| 2m41d45s | Do Americans Consume Too Little Natural Gas? An Empirical Test of Marginal Cost Pricing | 23 | 2 | 21 | 8.7% |
| 4vd3k3jt | The Length of Contracts and Collusion | 23 | 10 | 13 | 43.5% |
| 7p0168sp | What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California’s NOx Trading Program | 22 | 8 | 14 | 36.4% |
| 9jb8p7nn | Automobiles on Steroids: Product Attribute Trade-Offs and Technological Progress in the Automobile Sector | 22 | 8 | 14 | 36.4% |
| 4bx684r8 | Designing Electricity Auctions | 21 | 12 | 9 | 57.1% |
| 8h2313tg | Electricity Resource Adequacy: Matching Policies and Goals | 21 | 11 | 10 | 52.4% |
Disclaimer: due to the evolving nature of the web traffic we receive and the methods we use to collate it, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision.