Recent Work
Parent: Center for the Study of Energy Markets
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for September through December, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3ws6r3j4 | The Market Value and Cost of Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Production | 373 | 37 | 336 | 9.9% |
| 11w8d6m4 | Dynamic Pricing, Advanced Metering, and Demand Response in Electricity Markets | 320 | 74 | 246 | 23.1% |
| 4pd8s3h1 | Does Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana | 154 | 5 | 149 | 3.2% |
| 4bf4j0gw | Doing Well By Doing Good? Green Office Buildings | 113 | 30 | 83 | 26.5% |
| 3d8252zp | Does Extending Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from an Australian Experiment | 100 | 16 | 84 | 16.0% |
| 3td3n1x1 | Residential Customer Response to Real-time Pricing: The Anaheim Critical Peak Pricing Experiment | 87 | 13 | 74 | 14.9% |
| 2dk5g982 | The Economic Impacts of Climate Change: Evidence from Agricultural Profits and Random Fluctuations in Weather | 83 | 6 | 77 | 7.2% |
| 7vq1m8mq | Market Power in California's Gasoline Market | 73 | 5 | 68 | 6.8% |
| 74s774zj | Clearing the Air? The Effects of Gasoline Content Regulation on Air Quality | 65 | 7 | 58 | 10.8% |
| 3sr1h8nc | Equity Effects of Increasing-Block Electricity Pricing | 56 | 14 | 42 | 25.0% |
| 2159m46p | Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market | 48 | 13 | 35 | 27.1% |
| 86m171mn | Evidence of a Shift in the Short-Run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand | 47 | 3 | 44 | 6.4% |
| 34c206t9 | The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing | 45 | 8 | 37 | 17.8% |
| 8dv5c0t1 | Ownership Change, Incentives and Plant Efficiency: The Divestiture of U.S. Electric Generation Plants | 45 | 10 | 35 | 22.2% |
| 0mx44472 | Speculative Trading and Market Performance: The Effect of Arbitrageurs on Efficiency and Market Power in the New York Electricity Market | 44 | 10 | 34 | 22.7% |
| 27r2k4nf | Explaining the Price of Voluntary Carbon Offsets | 39 | 16 | 23 | 41.0% |
| 9tk2c4s9 | Electricity Rate Structures and the Economics of Solar PV: Could Mandatory Time-of-Use Rates Undermine California’s Solar Photovoltaic Subsidies? | 33 | 5 | 28 | 15.2% |
| 3qb650hh | Do Households Smooth Small Consumption Shocks? Evidence from Anticipated and Unanticipated Variation in Home Energy Costs | 32 | 3 | 29 | 9.4% |
| 5sf4m6rr | Retail Policies and Competition in the Gasoline Industry | 31 | 5 | 26 | 16.1% |
| 6dw241sv | Measuring Unilateral Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets: The California Market 1998 - 2000 | 31 | 9 | 22 | 29.0% |
| 7nm2f6sx | When it comes to Demand Response, is FERC its Own Worst Enemy? | 30 | 5 | 25 | 16.7% |
| 3g9504bb | The Implied Cost of Carbon Dioxide under the Cash for Clunkers Program | 29 | 5 | 24 | 17.2% |
| 85k8w3k7 | The History of Electricity Restructuring in California | 29 | 2 | 27 | 6.9% |
| 9241c68t | Market Structure and Competition: A Cross-Market Analysis of U.S. Electricity Deregulation | 29 | 9 | 20 | 31.0% |
| 2k54m0zk | On the Efficiency of Competitive Electricity Markets With Time-Invariant Retail Prices | 28 | 1 | 27 | 3.6% |
| 2m41d45s | Do Americans Consume Too Little Natural Gas? An Empirical Test of Marginal Cost Pricing | 27 | 3 | 24 | 11.1% |
| 1nn681tk | Climate Change, Mortality, and Adaptation: Evidence from Annual Fluctuations in Weather in the US | 26 | 12 | 14 | 46.2% |
| 4dd7f3mq | Capacity Markets for Electricity | 26 | 2 | 24 | 7.7% |
| 6266b54f | Asymmetric Price Adjustment and Consumer Search: An Examination of the Retail Gasoline Market | 26 | 12 | 14 | 46.2% |
| 0v38t8r8 | Valuing the Time-Varying Electricity Production of Solar Photovoltaic Cells | 25 | 2 | 23 | 8.0% |
| 62n6k1qx | The 'Make or Buy' Decision in U.S. Electricity Generation Investments | 23 | 6 | 17 | 26.1% |
| 6br429mf | Using Environmental Emissions Permit Prices to Raise Electricity Prices: Evidence from the California Electricity Market | 23 | 3 | 20 | 13.0% |
| 6m3355kj | California's Greenhouse Gas Policies: Local Solutions to a Global Problem? | 23 | 1 | 22 | 4.3% |
| 9xz9r2gm | The Implications of a Gasoline Price Floor for the California Budget and Greenhouse Gas Emissions | 23 | 3 | 20 | 13.0% |
| 4bx684r8 | Designing Electricity Auctions | 22 | 14 | 8 | 63.6% |
| 52f998s0 | Applying Psychology to Economic Policy Design: Using Incentive Preserving Rebates to Increase Acceptance of Critical Peak Electricity Pricing | 22 | 7 | 15 | 31.8% |
| 8913v4bk | An Empirical Assessment of the Competitiveness of the New England Electricity Market | 22 | 9 | 13 | 40.9% |
| 09v4k44b | Towards a Sustainable Energy Balance: Progressive Efficiency and the Return of Energy Conservation | 21 | 1 | 20 | 4.8% |
| 53q5q8rs | Taxes and Trading versus Intensity Standards: Second-Best Environmental Policies with Incomplete Regulation (Leakage) or Market Power | 21 | 3 | 18 | 14.3% |
| 54c0f88g | Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Abatement | 21 | 2 | 19 | 9.5% |
| 1qw1c912 | The Implementation of California AB 32 and its Impact on Wholesale Electricity Markets | 20 | 2 | 18 | 10.0% |
| 7m28150r | Index Contracts and Spot Market Competition | 19 | 5 | 14 | 26.3% |
| 9wp6969x | Is Real-Time Pricing Green?: The Environmental Impacts of Electricity Demand Variance | 19 | 6 | 13 | 31.6% |
| 50f4d8mr | Investment under Regulatory Uncertainty: U.S. Electricity Generation Investment Since 1996 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 38.9% |
| 0h90r7k2 | Building Out Alternative Fuel Retail Infrastructure: Government Fleet Spillovers in E85 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 17.6% |
| 5dt476pc | Lessons from the California Electricity Crisis | 17 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% |
| 6qr7m8kh | Market Effects of Environmental Regulation: Coal, Railroads and the 1990 Clean Air Act | 17 | 8 | 9 | 47.1% |
| 94j492v4 | The Efficiency of Electricity Generation in the U.S. After Restructuring | 17 | 3 | 14 | 17.6% |
| 0128s4r3 | Lessons from International Experience with Electricity Market Monitoring | 16 | 3 | 13 | 18.8% |
| 8qx3z0x7 | Variation of Distribution Factors with Loading | 16 | 8 | 8 | 50.0% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.