University of California Energy Institute (Archive)
Parent: Energy Institute at Haas
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for June through September, 2026
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74s774zj | Clearing the Air? The Effects of Gasoline Content Regulation on Air Quality | 745 | 78 | 667 | 10.5% |
| 11w8d6m4 | Dynamic Pricing, Advanced Metering, and Demand Response in Electricity Markets | 549 | 211 | 338 | 38.4% |
| 4bf4j0gw | Doing Well By Doing Good? Green Office Buildings | 422 | 45 | 377 | 10.7% |
| 1h6141nj | The Effect of Improved Fuel Economy on Vehicle Miles Traveled: Estimating the Rebound Effect Using U.S. State Data, 1966-2001 | 407 | 55 | 352 | 13.5% |
| 3ws6r3j4 | The Market Value and Cost of Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Production | 400 | 61 | 339 | 15.3% |
| 6266b54f | Asymmetric Price Adjustment and Consumer Search: An Examination of the Retail Gasoline Market | 358 | 43 | 315 | 12.0% |
| 86m171mn | Evidence of a Shift in the Short-Run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand | 329 | 19 | 310 | 5.8% |
| 2159m46p | Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market | 257 | 124 | 133 | 48.2% |
| 1nm1408v | A Motor-Integrated Parallel Hybrid Transmission | 256 | 85 | 171 | 33.2% |
| 37z0q55p | A New Design Tool for Visualizing the Energy Implications of California's Climates | 239 | 43 | 196 | 18.0% |
| 6dr9d5kw | Additions to a Design Tool for Visualizing the Energy Implications of California’s Climates | 239 | 70 | 169 | 29.3% |
| 85k8w3k7 | The History of Electricity Restructuring in California | 225 | 35 | 190 | 15.6% |
| 3fg2r29s | Understanding Crude Oil Prices | 218 | 71 | 147 | 32.6% |
| 3d8252zp | Does Extending Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from an Australian Experiment | 214 | 58 | 156 | 27.1% |
| 99k818c4 | The Potential of Cellulosic Ethanol Production from Municipal Solid Waste: A Technical and Economic Evaluation | 196 | 54 | 142 | 27.6% |
| 8gp1t87n | Model Studies of Pore Stability and Evolution in Thermal Barrier Coatings (TBCs) | 194 | 117 | 77 | 60.3% |
| 0mx44472 | Speculative Trading and Market Performance: The Effect of Arbitrageurs on Efficiency and Market Power in the New York Electricity Market | 193 | 17 | 176 | 8.8% |
| 34c206t9 | The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing | 192 | 36 | 156 | 18.8% |
| 3sr1h8nc | Equity Effects of Increasing-Block Electricity Pricing | 186 | 39 | 147 | 21.0% |
| 0wj3x8bm | Does Britain or The United States Have the Right Gas Tax? | 172 | 49 | 123 | 28.5% |
| 3td3n1x1 | Residential Customer Response to Real-time Pricing: The Anaheim Critical Peak Pricing Experiment | 170 | 39 | 131 | 22.9% |
| 65h8p4sb | Cournot Competition, Financial Option Markets, and Efficiency | 164 | 30 | 134 | 18.3% |
| 4pd8s3h1 | Does Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana | 163 | 44 | 119 | 27.0% |
| 3g9504bb | The Implied Cost of Carbon Dioxide under the Cash for Clunkers Program | 161 | 39 | 122 | 24.2% |
| 9s75171w | California's Electricity Crisis: A Market Apart? | 161 | 39 | 122 | 24.2% |
| 5sf4m6rr | Retail Policies and Competition in the Gasoline Industry | 154 | 37 | 117 | 24.0% |
| 2m41d45s | Do Americans Consume Too Little Natural Gas? An Empirical Test of Marginal Cost Pricing | 148 | 35 | 113 | 23.6% |
| 2c96w6ff | From Investor-owned Utility to Independent Power Producer | 147 | 30 | 117 | 20.4% |
| 9tk2c4s9 | Electricity Rate Structures and the Economics of Solar PV: Could Mandatory Time-of-Use Rates Undermine California’s Solar Photovoltaic Subsidies? | 146 | 19 | 127 | 13.0% |
| 8tq6z6t0 | Ensuring Generation Adequacy in Competitive Electricity Markets | 145 | 23 | 122 | 15.9% |
| 6ns670dt | Measurement of Oil and Gas Emissions from a Marine Seep | 143 | 49 | 94 | 34.3% |
| 7p0168sp | What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California’s NOx Trading Program | 143 | 33 | 110 | 23.1% |
| 2k54m0zk | On the Efficiency of Competitive Electricity Markets With Time-Invariant Retail Prices | 142 | 33 | 109 | 23.2% |
| 5x5543dg | An Equilibrium Model of Investment in Restructured Electricity Markets | 139 | 23 | 116 | 16.5% |
| 7nm2f6sx | When it comes to Demand Response, is FERC its Own Worst Enemy? | 133 | 37 | 96 | 27.8% |
| 53q5q8rs | Taxes and Trading versus Intensity Standards: Second-Best Environmental Policies with Incomplete Regulation (Leakage) or Market Power | 131 | 32 | 99 | 24.4% |
| 0h90r7k2 | Building Out Alternative Fuel Retail Infrastructure: Government Fleet Spillovers in E85 | 130 | 36 | 94 | 27.7% |
| 27r2k4nf | Explaining the Price of Voluntary Carbon Offsets | 130 | 39 | 91 | 30.0% |
| 4bz9j4wr | Modeling and Computing Two-settlement Oligopolistic Equilibrium in a Congested Electricity Network | 128 | 51 | 77 | 39.8% |
| 06h949cj | Quantifying the Air Pollution Exposure Consequences of Distributed Electricity Generation | 126 | 50 | 76 | 39.7% |
| 6dw241sv | Measuring Unilateral Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets: The California Market 1998 - 2000 | 126 | 47 | 79 | 37.3% |
| 8dv5c0t1 | Ownership Change, Incentives and Plant Efficiency: The Divestiture of U.S. Electric Generation Plants | 126 | 39 | 87 | 31.0% |
| 4s80j10t | Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Energy Station Concepts: Are "H 2E-Stations" a Key Link to a Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle Infrastructure? | 125 | 53 | 72 | 42.4% |
| 19h474cb | How Good are Supply Function Equilibrium Models: An Empirical Analysis of the ERCOT Balancing Market | 124 | 22 | 102 | 17.7% |
| 4bx684r8 | Designing Electricity Auctions | 124 | 48 | 76 | 38.7% |
| 0128s4r3 | Lessons from International Experience with Electricity Market Monitoring | 123 | 26 | 97 | 21.1% |
| 09648358 | The Distributional and Environmental Effects of Time-Varying Prices in Competitive Electricity Markets | 122 | 28 | 94 | 23.0% |
| 7bh5f7rn | Electricity Merger Policy in the Shadow of Regulation | 121 | 27 | 94 | 22.3% |
| 3qb650hh | Do Households Smooth Small Consumption Shocks? Evidence from Anticipated and Unanticipated Variation in Home Energy Costs | 120 | 28 | 92 | 23.3% |
| 54c0f88g | Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Abatement | 120 | 28 | 92 | 23.3% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.