Department of Linguistics

Parent: UCLA

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for June through September, 2026

ItemTitleTotal requestsDownloadView-only%Dnld
3tt2m1vsWPP, No. 107: Dispersion in the Vowel System of Pima8257715493.5%
5zx6z32dA Chadic Cornucopia52239013274.7%
26b4r9nwWPP, No. 9249027421655.9%
05b2s4wgThe empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology46212134126.2%
1xq3d5hrWPP, No. 76: Phonetic and Phonological Rules of Nasalization41717424341.7%
8k45g432WPP, No. 84: Fieldwork Studies of Targeted Languages39211527729.3%
63t1324hWPP, No. 107: Acoustic Study of Georgian Stop Consonants3905533514.1%
2138v3n3An outline of the narrative grammar of electronic dance music3843147081.8%
52f5v2x2WPP, No. 79: Articulatory and Acoustic Properties of Apical and Laminal Articulations36312124233.3%
7m55b8bbWPP, No.110: Glottal stops before word-initial vowels in American English: distribution and acoustic characteristics3406827220.0%
31p920zfIs Second Language Attrition Inevitable After Instruction Ends? An Exploratory Longitudinal Study of Advanced Instructed Second Language Users3354529013.4%
1gh6x943WPP, No. 108: Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin3347725723.1%
9q2137prWPP, No. 102: Dissection of the Speech Production Mechanism33010023030.3%
7jd6n6vdThe neural architecture of language: Integrative modeling converges on predictive processing3284128712.5%
7c42d7thSchuhschrift: Papers in Honor of Russell Schuh30917013955.0%
3h25w3h3WPP, No. 91: Fieldwork Studies of Targeted Languages III29112117041.6%
7999p9xwWPP, No. 50: UPSID (UCLA Phonological Segment Inventory Database)29014114948.6%
9xx930j1WPP, No. 108: Phonation Contrasts Across Languages2876921824.0%
0942x2jvWPP, No. 87: Fieldwork Studies of Targeted Languages II2801918968.2%
1640t82jVocal Fundamental Frequency and Sound Pressure Level in Charismatic Speech: A Cross-Gender and -Language Study2782225679.9%
84j8713pWPP, No. 93: Fieldwork Studies of Targeted Languages IV25914711256.8%
8gd9104hWPP, No. 108: The acoustics of coarticulated non-modal phonation2535320020.9%
1dq2z0kjWPP, No. 64: Some of the Sounds of the World's Languages24414410059.0%
0m52w1dwWPP, No.111: The Intonation of Tongan2435119221.0%
9k27q775How to vocode: Using channel vocoders for cochlear-implant research2311755675.8%
0n76t3hnWPP, No.111: Glottal articulations of phonation contrasts and their acoustic and perceptual consequences2295017921.8%
2rh299k5WPP, No. 452261319558.0%
5sn1s51rWPP, No. 702261468064.6%
3fn134hvWPP, No. 9: A Phonology of Akan22511610951.6%
85z926p7WPP, No. 104: Prosody in Sentence Processing: Korean vs. English2184217619.3%
6mt3d01xSemantic projection recovers rich human knowledge of multiple object features from word embeddings2165915727.3%
4sr0s3jwWPP, No. 86: Articulatory Timing in English Consonant Sequences2111248758.8%
52014440WPP, No. 722101456569.0%
3pg0w66xWPP, No. 972051357065.9%
9d46z3sbWPP, No.111: A preliminary model of Singaporean English intonational phonology2053117415.1%
8779b7gqWPP, No. 90: Acoustic Realizations of American /r/ as Produced by Women and Men2041099553.4%
9hk2v7rcWPP, No. 105: Phonological Development of Korean: A Case Study2031416269.5%
1wt272b6Laryngeal reduction and mora deletion in Mixtec1991663383.4%
6j56m1xzWPP, No.111: Word-initial glottalization and voice quality strengthening1995114825.6%
5bp4v3jdThe Mixtec couplet is not a consistent grammatical unit1911553681.2%
07b9m6x8WPP, No. 82: Phonetic Underspecification and Target Interpolation: An Acoustic Study of Marshallese Vowel Allophony1903016015.8%
7qd5v492WPP, No. 35: A Tonal Grammar of Etsako1874614124.6%
4j43d6qjWPP, No. 831841117360.3%
6p1293fdWPP, No. 88182879547.8%
7r50d55jWPP, No. 11: Practical Phonetic Exercises1782715115.2%
5bc7k7xdWPP, No.110: Perception of spectral slopes and tone identification in White Hmong176101665.7%
04r5q6qnWPP, No. 105: Linguistic Voice Quality1755412130.9%
4xw308mgWPP, No.111: Japanese consecutive devoicing as a phonetic process: the relative contribution of conditioning factors and its speaker variability1712814316.4%
88x529wrA comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010170818947.6%
4qs31528WPP, No. 108: Perception of pitch location within a speaker’s own range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex1691915011.2%

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.