The spatial and temporal focusing properties of time-reversal methods can be exploited for undersea acoustic communications. Spatial focusing mitigates channel fading and produces a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the intended receivers along with a low probability of interception elsewhere. While temporal focusing (compression) reduces significantly intersymbol interference (ISI), there always is some residual ISI depending upon the number of transmitters, their spatial distribution (spatial diversity), and the complexity of the channel. Moreover, a slight change in the environment over the two-way propagation interval introduces additional ISI. Using multilevel quadrature amplitude modulation (M-QAM) in shallow water, we demonstrate that the performance of time-reversal communications can be improved significantly by cascading the received time series with an adaptive channel equalizer to remove the residual ISI.

A time reversal mirror exploits spatial diversity to achieve spatial and temporal focusing, a useful property for communications in an environment with significant multipath. Taking advantage of spatial diversity involves using a number of receivers distributed in space. This paper presents the impact of spatial diversity in passive time reversal communications between a probe source (PS) and a vertical receive array using at-sea experimental data, while the PS is either fixed or moving at about 4 knots. The performance of two different approaches is compared in terms of output signal-to-noise ratio versus the number of receiver elements: (1) time reversal alone and (2) time reversal combined with adaptive channel equalization. The time-varying channel response due to source motion requires an adaptive channel equalizer such that approach (2) outperforms approach (1) by up to 13 dB as compared to 5 dB for a fixed source case. Experimental results around 3 kHz with a 1 kHz bandwidth illustrate that as few as two or three receivers (i.e., 2 or 4 in array aperture) can provide reasonable performance at ranges of 4.2 and 10 km in 118 in deep water. (c) 2006 Acoustical Society of America.