People often base judgments on stereotypes, even when
contradictory base-rate information is provided. It has been
suggested this occurs because people fail to engage or
complete deliberative reasoning needed to process numerical
base-rate information, and instead rely on intuitive reasoning.
However, recent research indicates people have some access
to this base-rate information even when they make stereotype
judgments. Here we tested several hypotheses regarding these
phenomena: A) People may believe stereotype information is
more diagnostic; B) People may find stereotype information
more salient; C) People have some intuitive access to baserate
information, but must engage in deliberation to make full
use of it. Aligning with account C, and counter to account A,
we found inducing deliberation generally increased the use of
base-rate information. Counter to account B, inducing
deliberation about stereotype information decreased use of
stereotype information. Additionally, more numerate
participants were more likely to make use of base-rate
information