- Seaton, Kelly E;
- Huang, Yunda;
- Karuna, Shelly;
- Heptinstall, Jack R;
- Brackett, Caroline;
- Chiong, Kelvin;
- Zhang, Lily;
- Yates, Nicole L;
- Sampson, Mark;
- Rudnicki, Erika;
- Juraska, Michal;
- deCamp, Allan C;
- Edlefsen, Paul T;
- Mullins, James I;
- Williamson, Carolyn;
- Rossenkhan, Raabya;
- Giorgi, Elena E;
- Kenny, Avi;
- Angier, Heather;
- Randhawa, April;
- Weiner, Joshua A;
- Rojas, Michelle;
- Sarzotti-Kelsoe, Marcella;
- Zhang, Lu;
- Sawant, Sheetal;
- Ackerman, Margaret E;
- McDermott, Adrian B;
- Mascola, John R;
- Hural, John;
- McElrath, M Julianna;
- Andrew, Philip;
- Hidalgo, Jose A;
- Clark, Jesse;
- Laher, Fatima;
- Orrell, Catherine;
- Frank, Ian;
- Gonzales, Pedro;
- Edupuganti, Srilatha;
- Mgodi, Nyaradzo;
- Corey, Lawrence;
- Morris, Lynn;
- Montefiori, David;
- Cohen, Myron S;
- Gilbert, Peter B;
- Tomaras, Georgia D
Background
The phase 2b proof-of-concept Antibody Mediated Prevention (AMP) trials showed that VRC01, an anti-HIV-1 broadly neutralising antibody (bnAb), prevented acquisition of HIV-1 sensitive to VRC01. To inform future study design and dosing regimen selection of candidate bnAbs, we investigated the association of VRC01 serum concentration with HIV-1 acquisition using AMP trial data.Methods
The case-control sample included 107 VRC01 recipients who acquired HIV-1 and 82 VRC01 recipients who remained without HIV-1 during the study. We measured VRC01 serum concentrations with a qualified pharmacokinetic (PK) Binding Antibody Multiplex Assay. We employed nonlinear mixed effects PK modelling to estimate daily-grid VRC01 concentrations. Cox regression models were used to assess the association of VRC01 concentration at exposure and baseline body weight, with the hazard of HIV-1 acquisition and prevention efficacy as a function of VRC01 concentration. We also compared fixed dosing vs. body weight-based dosing via simulations.Findings
Estimated VRC01 concentrations in VRC01 recipients without HIV-1 were higher than those in VRC01 recipients who acquired HIV-1. Body weight was inversely associated with HIV-1 acquisition among both placebo and VRC01 recipients but did not modify the prevention efficacy of VRC01. VRC01 concentration was inversely correlated with HIV-1 acquisition, and positively correlated with prevention efficacy of VRC01. Simulation studies suggest that fixed dosing may be comparable to weight-based dosing in overall predicted prevention efficacy.Interpretation
These findings suggest that bnAb serum concentration may be a useful marker for dosing regimen selection, and operationally efficient fixed dosing regimens could be considered for future trials of HIV-1 bnAbs.Funding
Was provided by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (UM1 AI068614, to the HIV Vaccine Trials Network [HVTN]; UM1 AI068635, to the HVTN Statistical Data and Management Center [SDMC], Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center [FHCC]; 2R37 054165 to the FHCC; UM1 AI068618, to HVTN Laboratory Center, FHCC; UM1 AI068619, to the HPTN Leadership and Operations Center; UM1 AI068613, to the HIV Prevention Trials Network [HPTN] Laboratory Center; UM1 AI068617, to the HPTN SDMC; and P30 AI027757, to the Center for AIDS Research, Duke University (AI P30 AI064518) and University of Washington (P30 AI027757) Centers for AIDS Research; R37AI054165 from NIAID to the FHCC; and OPP1032144 CA-VIMC Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.