In this dissertation I attempt to recreate through thick description a picture of monastic mentorship,i.e. The niśraya apprenticeship, as it is depicted by the compilers of and commentators
on the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya (MSV). I interpret the emerging picture of the niśraya apprenticeship
using a philologically-based post-critical method for reading literary forms and a
theoretical language derived from French and American sociology. On a theoretical level, my
interest is to better understand how the person of a new Buddhist monk or nun is shaped by
the ("obligatory") 5– to 10–year niśraya apprenticeship and how that shaping process can be
understood as a form of self-care, a technology of the self that harnesses discipline as an instrument
in a larger project of self-perfection.
In my introduction, I briefly explain how I came to the topic of niśraya and wonder
whether L.A. Waddell's Lāmaism prejudiced those in his wake to think the guru-disciple relationship
was intrinsically Tantric. I then explain the theoretical language and critical lenses
that I use in this study before giving a brief social history of ancient and medieval India, with
special attention to the gurukula, where the Vedic student serves their ācārya or guru in exchange
for which, the disciple receives the instruction they need to become an ācārya or
guru themself. Interpreting the niśraya apprenticeship as a Buddhist gurukula, I then consider
the Vinaya's intertwined development with the Dharmaśāstric literature, drawing upon recent
scholarship to argue that the dharmas early Buddhist monastics were debating are better regarded
as "rules" than "laws". In closing, I review previous scholarship on the niśraya apprenticeship
and Guṇaprabha's Vinayasūtra.
In chapter 1, I demonstrate, with a close reading of the extant canonical vinayas in Sanskrit,
Pāli, Chinese, and Tibetan, that all Indian Buddhist monasticisms shared a model of
and vocabulary for monastic training, generally introduced with the ordination rite under the
rubric niśraya.
1
In chapter 2, I introduce Guṇaprabha's first sūtra, consider the claim about the Vinaya he
makes with it, and examine Guṇaprabha's appropriation of the sūtra form from his Buddhist
rivals in medieval India's other philosophico-religious disciplines. I then attempt a genealogy
of śīla, as Guṇaprabha uses it in his own comments on the first sūtra, first, surveying the
opinions of MSV commentators, followed by contemporary opinions on śīla and its relation to
the Vinaya, and an examination of the Vaibhāṣika and Sautrāntika takes on śīla with
Vasubandhu's Abhidharmakośa and Abhidharmakośabhāṣya as my guide. I reflect briefly on
the Vaibhāṣika interpretation of śīla, considering it a reflection of a more fundamental sense
of śīla, śīla-as-habitus. To close the chapter, I discuss how Dharmamitra's Vinayasūtraṭīkā
demonstrates the exegetical principles stipulated by Vasubandhu in his Vyākhyāyukti and
consider Dharmamitra's style as an instance of the Buddhist śāstric or "scholastic" style. The
formal and stylistic choices made by Guṇaprabha and Dharmamitra are best understood
against the background of Mathurā's contested Sanskrit culture, which I discuss briefly before
closing the chapter.
In chapter 3, I focus on Guṇaprabha's digest of the Pravrajyāvastu's niśraya section
(sūtras 70–77) and use thick description—drawing especially upon narratives and rulings
from the Kṣudrakavastu and the Uttaragrantha—to construct a picture of the master-apprentice
relationship as it is prescribed in the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya (MSV). I examine the
niśraya master's and the niśrita apprentice's duties to one another, their daily routines and
monthly calendars, their environment, and the official curriculum that are to follow, etc.,
Drawing upon the recent work of Gregory Schopen and in the Dharmaśāstric literature, I argue
that the saṅgha functioned as a guild of ascetics whose skills-in-trade were learning and
the possession of śīla. I thus consider how the niśraya apprenticeship affords for monastic
apprentices to gain the knowledge and practical mastery of saṅgha culture they need to secure
independence and become masters themselves. From a theoretical perspective, I consider
the structures, forms, rhythms, and hierarchies I discuss in this chapter as instrumental
to the monastic's acquisition of practical mastery. In chapter 4, I discuss those ways in which
the monastic apprenticeship describes the process of becoming "learned".
In chapter 4, I focus on sūtras 78–102 of Guṇaprabha's Vinayasūtra, which present 21
pentads of qualities that comprise the niśraya master's qualifications. I close read Guṇaprabha's
auto-commentary alongside commentaries by his Indic heirs and the main Tibetan
Vinaya authorities, Tshonawa, Buton Rinchen Drub, the First Dalai Lama, and the Eighth
Karmapa. I examine in these sūtras, patterns of Buddhism's "culture of oral transmission"