- Al'Aref, Subhi J;
- Singh, Gurpreet;
- Choi, Jeong W;
- Xu, Zhuoran;
- Maliakal, Gabriel;
- van Rosendael, Alexander R;
- Lee, Benjamin C;
- Fatima, Zahra;
- Andreini, Daniele;
- Bax, Jeroen J;
- Cademartiri, Filippo;
- Chinnaiyan, Kavitha;
- Chow, Benjamin JW;
- Conte, Edoardo;
- Cury, Ricardo C;
- Feuchtner, Gudruf;
- Hadamitzky, Martin;
- Kim, Yong-Jin;
- Lee, Sang-Eun;
- Leipsic, Jonathon A;
- Maffei, Erica;
- Marques, Hugo;
- Plank, Fabian;
- Pontone, Gianluca;
- Raff, Gilbert L;
- Villines, Todd C;
- Weirich, Harald G;
- Cho, Iksung;
- Danad, Ibrahim;
- Han, Donghee;
- Heo, Ran;
- Lee, Ji Hyun;
- Rizvi, Asim;
- Stuijfzand, Wijnand J;
- Gransar, Heidi;
- Lu, Yao;
- Sung, Ji Min;
- Park, Hyung-Bok;
- Berman, Daniel S;
- Budoff, Matthew J;
- Samady, Habib;
- Stone, Peter H;
- Virmani, Renu;
- Narula, Jagat;
- Chang, Hyuk-Jae;
- Lin, Fay Y;
- Baskaran, Lohendran;
- Shaw, Leslee J;
- Min, James K
Objectives
This study sought to identify culprit lesion (CL) precursors among acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients based on qualitative and quantitative computed tomography-based plaque characteristics.Background
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been validated for patient-level prediction of ACS. However, the applicability of coronary CTA to CL assessment is not known.Methods
Utilizing the ICONIC (Incident COroNary Syndromes Identified by Computed Tomography) study, a nested case-control study of 468 patients with baseline coronary CTA, the study included ACS patients with invasive coronary angiography-adjudicated CLs that could be aligned to CL precursors on baseline coronary CTA. Separate blinded core laboratories adjudicated CLs and performed atherosclerotic plaque evaluation. Thereafter, the study used a boosted ensemble algorithm (XGBoost) to develop a predictive model of CLs. Data were randomly split into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of this model was compared with that of diameter stenosis (model 1), high-risk plaque features (model 2), and lesion-level features of CL precursors from the ICONIC study (model 3). Thereafter, the machine learning (ML) model was applied to 234 non-ACS patients with 864 lesions to determine model performance for CL exclusion.Results
CL precursors were identified by both coronary angiography and baseline coronary CTA in 124 of 234 (53.0%) patients, with a total of 582 lesions (containing 124 CLs) included in the analysis. The ML model demonstrated significantly higher area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for discriminating CL precursors (0.774; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.758 to 0.790) compared with model 1 (0.599; 95% CI: 0.599 to 0.599; p < 0.01), model 2 (0.532; 95% CI: 0.501 to 0.563; p < 0.01), and model 3 (0.672; 95% CI: 0.662 to 0.682; p < 0.01). When applied to the non-ACS cohort, the ML model had a specificity of 89.3% for excluding CLs.Conclusions
In a high-risk cohort, a boosted ensemble algorithm can be used to predict CL from non-CL precursors on coronary CTA.