Hydrogen (H2) combustion and Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFC) have the potential to mitigateaviation-induced greenhouse emissions in comparison to kerosene propulsion. This thesis describes a methodology to assess the performance and emissions trade-offs of retrofitting a
short, medium, and long haul aircraft employing conventional kerosene powered propulsion,
with H2-combustion and SOFC hybrid powered lower emission alternatives. The proposed
framework employs a constant range approach analysis to design a liquid hydrogen fuel tank
that meets insulation, sizing, center of gravity, and power constraints. These liquid hydrogen tanks are utilized to compare the performance of H2-combustion powered and SOFC
hybrid powered aircraft, all flying the same range. A lifecycle assessment is conducted to
evaluate the potential mitigation of carbon footprints through greenhouse gas emissions and
contrail formation effects. Additionally, a cost analysis is modeled to examine the implications of implementing such retrofitting. In this thesis, three sample cases are presented to
demonstrate the proposed framework on different aircraft models: Embraer 170LR (representing short haul), Boeing 737-800 (medium haul), and Boeing 777-300ER (long haul). The
advantages of adopting the mentioned alternative fuel sources are evident, with an overall
reduction in aircraft mass observed for medium and long haul configurations. However, for
the short haul case, there is a slight increase in overall weight of 1.13% for H2-combustion and 1.39% for the SOFC hybrid system. Conversely, the medium haul case shows a substantial 27.73% decrease in overall weight for H2-combustion and a 0.4% decrease for the SOFC
hybrid configuration. For long haul flights, H2-combustion and SOFC cases yield weight
reductions of 38.51% and 2.85%, respectively, compared to conventional kerosene-powered
aircraft. Moreover, considering the trade-off of removing cargo compartments to maintain
fixed passenger capacity and range by making refueling stops, the lifecycle analysis of green
hydrogen in H2-combustion and SOFC hybrid configurations results in an average reduction
of 40% and 68% in CO2 lbs of emissions, respectively, compared to conventional Jet-A fuel
emissions across all haul configurations. Fuel costs increase by 45% when replacing kerosene
combustion with SOFC hybrid power using gray H2 for the short haul configuration, considering one refueling stop. In the case of long haul flights using green H2-combustion, the cost
increases by 58.18% compared to conventional kerosene powered aircraft. However, for the
long haul SOFC green H2-combustion case (ii), which includes 50% of passengers and their
luggage, the total cost is estimated to be close to 33 million USD, representing a 98.90% increase compared to the cost of the long haul kerosene-powered aircraft. The results obtained
through this methodology indicate that retrofitting all three aircraft to operate with these
alternative fuels can significantly lower carbon emissions at a higher total cost, considering
the trade-off of removing cargo compartments and making refueling stops to maintain the
same fixed range as specified for each aircraft.