- Biesecker, Leslie G;
- Adam, Margaret P;
- Alkuraya, Fowzan S;
- Amemiya, Anne R;
- Bamshad, Michael J;
- Beck, Anita E;
- Bennett, James T;
- Bird, Lynne M;
- Carey, John C;
- Chung, Brian;
- Clark, Robin D;
- Cox, Timothy C;
- Curry, Cynthia;
- Dinulos, Mary Beth Palko;
- Dobyns, William B;
- Giampietro, Philip F;
- Girisha, Katta M;
- Glass, Ian A;
- Graham, John M;
- Gripp, Karen W;
- Haldeman-Englert, Chad R;
- Hall, Bryan D;
- Innes, A Micheil;
- Kalish, Jennifer M;
- Keppler-Noreuil, Kim M;
- Kosaki, Kenjiro;
- Kozel, Beth A;
- Mirzaa, Ghayda M;
- Mulvihill, John J;
- Nowaczyk, Malgorzata JM;
- Pagon, Roberta A;
- Retterer, Kyle;
- Rope, Alan F;
- Sanchez-Lara, Pedro A;
- Seaver, Laurie H;
- Shieh, Joseph T;
- Slavotinek, Anne M;
- Sobering, Andrew K;
- Stevens, Cathy A;
- Stevenson, David A;
- Tan, Tiong Yang;
- Tan, Wen-Hann;
- Tsai, Anne C;
- Weaver, David D;
- Williams, Marc S;
- Zackai, Elaine;
- Zarate, Yuri A
The delineation of disease entities is complex, yet recent advances in the molecular characterization of diseases provide opportunities to designate diseases in a biologically valid manner. Here, we have formalized an approach to the delineation of Mendelian genetic disorders that encompasses two distinct but inter-related concepts: (1) the gene that is mutated and (2) the phenotypic descriptor, preferably a recognizably distinct phenotype. We assert that only by a combinatorial or dyadic approach taking both of these attributes into account can a unitary, distinct genetic disorder be designated. We propose that all Mendelian disorders should be designated as "GENE-related phenotype descriptor" (e.g., "CFTR-related cystic fibrosis"). This approach to delineating and naming disorders reconciles the complexity of gene-to-phenotype relationships in a simple and clear manner yet communicates the complexity and nuance of these relationships.