Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Scholarly Works (2 results)

  • Article
  • Peer Reviewed
Journal of Education and Teaching in Emergency Medicine, Volume 5, Issue 4 (2020)
    Cover page: What do you do if your relief comes to work intoxicated: An Impaired Provider ScenarioCreative Commons 'BY' version 4.0 license
    • Article
    Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health, Volume 23, Issue 4.1 (2022)

    Background: In January 2022, USMLE Step 1 scoring will be pass/fail (P/F). Although this change aims to decrease applicant stress, it will impact the way EM program directors (PDs) review applications. Little research exists on how the transition will impact applicants.

    Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine if a change in Step 1 scoring will affect the likelihood to interview (LTI) an applicant. We hypothesized that transitioning to P/F scoring may negatively impact the LTI for students from less prominent schools.

    Methods: A survey of mock residency applications from strong, fair, and poor applicants was distributed to EM PDs via the CORD list serve. Respondents rated the LTI of applicants on a 5-point Likert scale. Applications from allopathic (MD), osteopathic (DO), and international medical graduates (IMG) were included. School prominence was determined by the 2020 US News & World Report rankings. Survey respondents were randomized to review applications with either numeric or P/F scores. Independent sample t-tests were calculated in SPSS 23.0 to compare mean ratings for applications based on scored or P/F scenarios for MD, DO, and IMG groups separately. This study was approved by the institutional review board at the study site.

    Results: Of 149 responses, poor performing MD students from highly prominent schools had a higher LTI with P/F scoring than poor performing students from less prominent schools (2.03 vs. 1.55, p < .01). For strong and fair performing MD students, no significant difference in LTI existed amongst high and less prominent schools with P/F scoring (Table 1). Strong DO (p<.01) and IMG (p<.001) applicants had higher LTI with P/F, while fair DO (p<.01) and IMG (p<.001) applicants had higher LTI with a numeric score (Table 2).

    Conclusions: When only P/F scoring is reported, poor performing students from low prominence schools have a significantly lower LTI than poor performing peers from high prominence schools.27 The Impact of Medical Education Fellowships on the Careers of Graduates

      Cover page: Transitioning to Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1: Will Students from Less Prominent Schools be Adversely Impacted?Creative Commons 'BY' version 4.0 license
      Top