Limitations in visual working memory (VWM) have been extensively
studied in psychophysical tasks, but not well understood
in terms of how memory limits translate to performance
in more natural domains. For example, in reaching to grasp an
object based on a spatial memory representation, overshooting
the intended target may be more costly than undershooting,
such as when reaching for a cup of hot coffee. The current
body of literature lacks a detailed account of how the physical
consequences and costs of memory error influence what
we encode in visual memory, and how we act on the basis of
remembered information. Here, we study whether externallyimposed
monetary costs influence behavior in a task that involves
motor planning based on information recalled from
VWM. Our results indicate that subjects accounted for the uncertainty
in their visual memory, showing a significant difference
in their motor planning when monetary costs were imposed
for memory errors. However, our findings indicate that
subjects’ memory representations per se were not biased by
the imposed costs, but rather subjects adopted a near-optimal
post-mnemonic decision strategy