- Pabla, Sarabjot;
- Conroy, Jeffrey M;
- Nesline, Mary K;
- Glenn, Sean T;
- Papanicolau-Sengos, Antonios;
- Burgher, Blake;
- Hagen, Jacob;
- Giamo, Vincent;
- Andreas, Jonathan;
- Lenzo, Felicia L;
- Yirong, Wang;
- Dy, Grace K;
- Yau, Edwin;
- Early, Amy;
- Chen, Hongbin;
- Bshara, Wiam;
- Madden, Katherine G;
- Shirai, Keisuke;
- Dragnev, Konstantin;
- Tafe, Laura J;
- Marin, Daniele;
- Zhu, Jason;
- Clarke, Jeff;
- Labriola, Matthew;
- McCall, Shannon;
- Zhang, Tian;
- Zibelman, Matthew;
- Ghatalia, Pooja;
- Araujo-Fernandez, Isabel;
- Singavi, Arun;
- George, Ben;
- MacKinnon, Andrew Craig;
- Thompson, Jonathan;
- Singh, Rajbir;
- Jacob, Robin;
- Dressler, Lynn;
- Steciuk, Mark;
- Binns, Oliver;
- Kasuganti, Deepa;
- Shah, Neel;
- Ernstoff, Marc;
- Odunsi, Kunle;
- Kurzrock, Razelle;
- Gardner, Mark;
- Galluzzi, Lorenzo;
- Morrison, Carl
Background
Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been linked to local immunosuppression independent of major ICI targets (e.g., PD-1). Clinical experience with response prediction based on PD-L1 expression suggests that other factors influence sensitivity to ICIs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.Methods
Tumor specimens from 120 NSCLC patients from 10 institutions were evaluated for PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry, and global proliferative profile by targeted RNA-seq.Results
Cell proliferation, derived from the mean expression of 10 proliferation-associated genes (namely BUB1, CCNB2, CDK1, CDKN3, FOXM1, KIAA0101, MAD2L1, MELK, MKI67, and TOP2A), was identified as a marker of response to ICIs in NSCLC. Poorly, moderately, and highly proliferative tumors were somewhat equally represented in NSCLC, with tumors with the highest PD-L1 expression being more frequently moderately proliferative as compared to lesser levels of PD-L1 expression. Proliferation status had an impact on survival in patients with both PD-L1 positive and negative tumors. There was a significant survival advantage for moderately proliferative tumors compared to their combined highly/poorly counterparts (p = 0.021). Moderately proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors had a median survival of 14.6 months that was almost twice that of PD-L1 negative highly/poorly proliferative at 7.6 months (p = 0.028). Median survival in moderately proliferative PD-L1 negative tumors at 12.6 months was comparable to that of highly/poorly proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors at 11.5 months, but in both instances less than that of moderately proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors. Similar to survival, proliferation status has impact on disease control (DC) in patients with both PD-L1 positive and negative tumors. Patients with moderately versus those with poorly or highly proliferative tumors have a superior DC rate when combined with any classification schema used to score PD-L1 as a positive result (i.e., TPS ≥ 50% or ≥ 1%), and best displayed by a DC rate for moderately proliferative tumors of no less than 40% for any classification of PD-L1 as a negative result. While there is an over representation of moderately proliferative tumors as PD-L1 expression increases this does not account for the improved survival or higher disease control rates seen in PD-L1 negative tumors.Conclusions
Cell proliferation is potentially a new biomarker of response to ICIs in NSCLC and is applicable to PD-L1 negative tumors.