Introduction

 This study is a retrospective cohort analysis that describes key clinical outcomes in elderly individuals who undergo outpatient surgical procedures. In particular, we report same-day admission, 30-day mortality, 30-day complications, and 30-day readmission rates for three separate age groups undergoing frequent outpatient, general surgical procedures.

Methods

Patients ≥18 years old who underwent the 10 most common outpatient surgical procedures in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2017 to 2019 and who underwent general anesthesia were included in the study. The primary outcome of interest was hospital admission, defined as hospital length of stay >0 days. Secondary outcomes of interest included 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, and 30-day postoperative complications. The primary exposure variable of interest was age, which was divided into <65 years of age (reference cohort), 65-79 years of age, and ≥80 years of age. For univariate analysis, to measure differences in the outcomes and patient characteristics, we used chi-squared tests. Our primary method of analysis was multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Those who were ≥80 and 65-79 years of age compared to <65 years of age had higher odds of same-day admission, 30-day mortality, composite postoperative complications, and readmission. Patients who were ≥80 years old had higher odds of same-day admission for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, partial mastectomy, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, inguinal hernia repair, umbilical hernia repair, laparoscopic removal of adnexal structures, and lumbar laminotomy.

Conclusion

Increasing age, particularly greater than 80 years or older and 65-79 years of age group, is associated with an increased rate of same-day hospital admissions and complications after ambulatory surgery.

Background It is currently unknown whether 6 months of supervised treadmill exercise has a durable benefit on 6-minute walk performance, even after exercise is completed, in people with peripheral artery disease. Methods and Results A total of 156 participants with peripheral artery disease were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: supervised treadmill exercise, supervised resistance training, or attention control. Participants received supervised sessions during months 1 to 6 and telephone contact during months 6 to 12. Primary outcomes were change in 6-minute walk distance and short physical performance battery at 6-month follow-up and have been reported previously. Secondary outcomes were change in 6-minute walk and short physical performance battery at 12-month follow-up and are reported here. A group of 134 participants (86%) completed the 12-month follow-up. At 6-month follow-up, compared with control, 6-minute walk distance improved in the treadmill exercise group (+36.1 m, 95% CI =13.9-58.3, P=0.001). Between 6- and 12-month follow-up, 6-minute walk distance significantly declined (-28.6 m, 95% CI=-52.6 to -4.5, P=0.020) and physical activity declined -272 activity units (95% CI =-546 to +2, P=0.052) in the treadmill exercise group compared with controls. At 12-month follow-up, 6 months after completing supervised treadmill exercise, change in 6-minute walk distance was not different between the treadmill exercise and control groups (+7.5, 95% CI =-17.5 to +32.6, P=0.56). There were no differences in short physical performance battery change between either exercise group and control at 6-month or 12-month follow-up. Conclusions A 6-month supervised treadmill exercise intervention that improved 6-minute walk distance at 6-month follow-up did not have persistent benefit at 12-month follow-up. These results do not support a durable benefit of supervised treadmill exercise in peripheral artery disease. Clinical Trial Registration URL : https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Identifier: NCT 00106327.

BACKGROUND: Among people with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD), little is known about variation in response to supervised exercise therapy (SET). Clinical characteristics associated with greater responsiveness to SET have not been identified. METHODS: Data from participants with PAD in two randomized clinical trials comparing SET vs nonexercising control were combined. The exercise intervention consisted of three times weekly supervised treadmill exercise. The control groups received lectures on health-related topics. RESULTS: Of 309 unique participants randomized (mean age, 67.9 years [standard deviation, 9.3 years]; 132 [42.7%] women; 185 [59.9%] black), 285 (92%) completed 6-month follow-up. Compared with control, those randomized to SET improved 6-minute walk distance by 35.6 meters (95% confidence interval, 21.4-49.8; P < .001). In the 95 (62.1%) participants who attended at least 70% of SET sessions, change in 6-minute walk distance varied from -149.4 to +356.0 meters. Thirty-four (35.8%) had no 6-minute walk distance improvement. Among all participants, age, sex, race, body mass index, prior lower extremity revascularization, and other clinical characteristics did not affect the degree of improvement in 6-minute walk distance after SET relative to the control group. Participants with 6-minute walk distance less than the median of 334 meters at baseline had greater percentage improvement in 6-minute walk distance compared with those with baseline 6-minute walk distance above the median (+20.5% vs +5.3%; P for interaction = .0107). CONCLUSIONS: Among people with PAD, substantial variability exists in walking improvement after SET. Shorter 6-minute walk distance at baseline was associated with greater improvement after SET, but other clinical characteristics, including age, sex, prior lower extremity revascularization, and disease severity, did not affect responsiveness to exercise therapy.