The presentation of a physician's clothing and themselves is an important part of the physician-patient interaction. Physician attire can impact patient satisfaction and trust in their physician. We sought to discover the influence physician attire may have on patients' comfort level with proposed treatment plans, which could influence treatment adherence. We surveyed 495 subjects to better understand the relationship between physician attire and patients' perceptions of treatment plans. We found subjects' comfort level in proposed treatment plans was not significantly affected by physician attire. This finding suggests physician attire may not be as important when considering the potential effect on treatment adherence.

Psoriasis severity assessments for clinical trial entry may be unintentionally overestimated, especially if trial eligibility is chiefly dependent on rating of disease severity. When this results in patients with less severe phenotypes joining clinical trials it is referred to as eligibility creep. We investigated the potential impact of psychosocial incentives on psoriasis lesion severity grading. A survey was constructed and disseminated through Amazon Mechanical Turk. Participants completed two vignette-style questions prompted with a randomly allocated psychosocial incentive. Questions required participants to grade and select psoriasis lesion pictures for a fictional trial. Participants also decided whether or not to schedule re-evaluation of patients deemed ineligible at initial visit. There were 646 participants. There was no significant difference in number of total lesions selected for study inclusion between incentive groups (Kruskal-Wallis, P=0.30). In general, participants completing empathy and professional uncertainty incentives selected the most and least number of lesion pictures for trial inclusion, respectively. Participants prompted with empathy incentives had significantly greater rates of choosing to schedule a follow-up visit for ineligible patients compared to participants prompted with other incentives (69.7% versus 59.1%, Chi square P=0.046). Situations evoking empathy may contribute to eligibility creep.

Skin diseases are commonly encountered in medical practice, yet medical students often receive little dermatology training. There is little research on what self-study materials best prepare students. We aim to identify which resources dermatology residents have found to be most useful in preparing for clinical dermatology rotations and dermatology residency. Forty current dermatology residents and fellows responded to our REDCap-generated survey. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Most respondents (N=36, 90%) reported using outside resources to prepare for clinical dermatology rotations and dermatology residency. American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) modules and other online resources were most used (N=31, 77.5%) and most recommended (N=32, 80%). However, 67.5% of all respondents also used printed textbooks in some capacity, but low-to-no cost, usefulness, and easy accessibility of online resources made them more favorable among study participants. Multiple clinical dermatology rotations were recommended for preparing for dermatology residency (N= 34, 85%), as were other rotations, including internal medicine (N=22, 55%) and rheumatology (N=17, 42.5%). Overall, the AAD modules and online resources are most useful when preparing for clinical dermatology rotations because of favorable cost and accessibility. Compared to clinical rotations in other specialties, multiple rotations in dermatology may be most helpful for dermatology residency.