Advancements in neuroimaging and brain stimulation techniques have provided unique opportunities to further understand the neural mechanisms of episodic memory retrieval. The act of retrieving information about a past experience is known to depend on the coordinated engagement of a broad networks of regions, including frontal lobe regions such as the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) and medial temporal lobe areas such as the hippocampus (Cabeza & St. Jacques, 2007; Maguire & Mummery, 1999; Reynolds, McDermott, & Braver, 2006). Although much of the field’s extant knowledge has been derived from studies assessing memories formed in laboratory-based settings, the incorporation of life-logging technology – such as wearable digital camera devices – can assist with the nonintrusive photographic capture of everyday life events, which can later be employed as mnemonic probes. The experiments in this dissertation aim to assess the neural mechanisms mediating real-world episodic retrieval by employing naturalistic stimuli to elicit memories for personal experiences.
This dissertation begins with a broad overview of the behavioral and neural findings derived from memory experiments incorporating wearable camera technology, followed by novel examinations of the neural correlates underlying real-world events through the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). Chapter 2 featured an in-depth review of prior applications of wearable digital cameras to behavioral and neuroimaging assessments of autobiographical memory retrieval as well as how their contributions expand knowledge of such processes to naturalistic settings. Chapters 3-5 report the results of a series of fMRI investigations examining recall of events from the real world and how they may differ across mnemonic features related to the original experiential source of the event, the recognition of the event based on previously encountering photographs of those experiences, and the temporal order of the event details. Chapter 3 found that dissociable patterns of neural activation were evoked in brain networks previously implicated in either autobiographical or laboratory-based memory retrieval (McDermott, Szpunar, & Christ, 2009), such that the autobiographical memory network was preferentially sensitive to whether or not the depicted events had been personally experienced, while the laboratory-based network was preferentially sensitive to whether or not photographs of the depicted events had been previously encountered. These findings suggest that these networks contribute to different retrieval processes and showcase how memories for first-hand experiences have distinctive neural signatures from memories for second-hand event knowledge. Chapter 4 focused on the hippocampus, with an emphasis on the division of labor along the hippocampal long-axis. The findings revealed that the posterior hippocampus was disproportionately sensitive to the source of the photographs, whereas the anterior hippocampus reacted more strongly to whether the photographs themselves had been previously seen, as well as whether their temporal order was intact. Chapter 5 assessed hemispheric differences in RLPFC responsivity to violations of temporal order during retrieval. The left RLPFC exhibited greater activation for temporal order violations only when events were novel, while the right RLPFC demonstrated greater activation for temporal order violations only when events had been previously encountered as photographs. These results suggest that the RLPFC is capable of differentially determining whether events are consistent with either prior schemas or memories. To further examine the left RLPFC and evaluate its causal involvement in mnemonic processes, Chapter 6 applied HD-tDCS methodology to this region in order to determine its impact on event recognition and temporal order processing. The targeted application of anodal current to the left RLPFC produced an increased likelihood of false recognition and – relative to sham stimulation – led to a shift in response bias, which may indicate the RLPFC’s role in memory monitoring. Together, these findings from fMRI and HD-tDCS experiments help clarify the contributions and characteristics of the neural substrate supporting episodic memory retrieval, particularly with regards to how these processes may occur in the real world.