Discovery and application of causal knowledge in novel problem
contexts is a prime example of human intelligence. As new in-
formation is obtained from the environment during interactions,
people develop and refine causal schemas to establish a parsimo-
nious explanation of underlying problem constraints. The aim
of the current study is to systematically examine human abil-
ity to discover causal schemas by exploring the environment and
transferring knowledge to new situations with greater or differ-
ent structural complexity. We developed a novel OpenLock task,
in which participants explored a virtual “escape room” environ-
ment by moving levers that served as “locks” to open a door.
In each situation, the sequential movements of the levers that
opened the door formed a branching causal sequence that began
with either a common-cause (CC) or a common-effect (CE) struc-
ture. Participants in a baseline condition completed five trials
with high structural complexity (i.e., four active levers). Those
in the transfer conditions completed six training trials with low
structural complexity (i.e., three active levers) before completing
a high-complexity transfer trial. The causal schema acquired in
the transfer condition was either congruent or incongruent with
that in the transfer condition. Baseline performance under the
CC schema was superior to performance under the CE schema,
and schema congruency facilitated transfer performance when the
congruent schema was the less difficult CC schema. We com-
pared between-subjects human performance to a deep reinforce-
ment learning model and found that a standard deep reinforce-
ment learning model (DDQN) is unable to capture the causal ab-
straction presented between trials with the same causal schema
and trials with a transfer of causal schema.