"Liberatory Archives: Benevolence, Silence, and Power in California's San Joaquin Valley" is a conceptual study of the liberatory possibilities of UC Merced’s Special Collections and Archives. Based on my creation of the public history Livingston Centennial Guide and a paired teacher training digital ethnic studies syllabus, this dissertation explores the consequences of historical benevolence by mainstream collections in the San Joaquin Valley and builds a methodology on liberatory archives for and by Valley communities.
The dissertation begins with a story about how the early 20th century residents of Livingston's Japanese colonies secured a place as model minorities by assimilating into the white, Christian, agriculturalism of the region. As a result, Livingston public memory experiences a false impression that people of Asian descent have been wholly welcome and equal residents throughout the town's history. In reality, many of the Valley's white agriculturalists at the time devised violent race-based extralegal abductions and deportations targeted directly at Asian farmers. I share very similarly structured stories from the Livingston Centennial Guide throughout each chapter to show the disconnect between public memory and the realities of the agricultural-industrial complex as it variably transpired in people's day-to-day lives. I contend that a conflict-avoidant, friendly portrayal of history effectively silences whole communities by removing their stories from mainstream discourse, public memory, and institutional archives. By bringing historical silences into sharp relief, we decolonize knowledge production, engender a sense of belonging, and enact anti-racism to build equitable systems. These efforts, most commonly accomplished through ethnic studies education, create affective benefits and a sense of belonging that is engendered from realistic portrayals of history.
Next, I contend with the broader geopolitical context for why community histories in the San Joaquin Valley might be hidden, underfunded, scattered, deprioritized, undervalued, incarcerated, abandoned, and silenced. Located in the 365-mile stretch of land sometimes known as “Prison Alley,” I argue that the UC Merced Library’s struggles have as much to do with the agricultural-industrial complex as they do with austerity politics at the state and national level. I explore how the decrease in state funds to public universities ultimately impacts the liberatory possibilities of university special collections and archives. Specifically, I look at how the University of California Library system has had to pivot in response to austerity measures—even as budgets for law enforcement and prisons swell—and how that pivot has tended to look like digital scholarship.
Later, I demonstrate how austerity at the UC Merced Library has looked like embracing a collaborative opportunity with the University of California Cooperative Extension (UCCE), as well as the Yosemite and Sequoia-Kings Canyon (SEKI) National Parks. Here, I examine the consequences of an uncritical representation of land-grant institutions in the archives. Primarily comprised of the UCCE and national parks collections, the UC Merced Library's Sierra Nevada-Central Valley Research Archive is deeply wanted and needed, but its main materials thus far romanticize a Western domination of nature and scientific prowess. I flip this narrative on its head to analyze the historical context of UCCE to situate the university as a crucial element of what I call the agro-academic-industrial complex. Connected to the previous chapter, I illustrate that even though the university has experienced massive state budget cuts since the 1980s, it continues to play a foundational role in shaping California's agricultural economy. I then look at the broader framework for how national parks are maintained through first legal removal and criminalization of Indigenous peoples, and then law enforcement who patrol and implement those laws under the guise of environmental conservation, which I call conservation cops. The Sierra Nevada-Central Valley Research Archive fails to think critically about how land-grant institutions came to be and continue to function. I use my analysis to urge for the archive to center communities who have been most negatively impacted by the land-grant system: Indigenous peoples, im/migrants workers, and prisoners.
The epilogue draws a line between the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade and the antebellum U.S. South to the rural American West to collapse time and space to show that an abolitionist praxis is always already relevant. One might not typically associate a small, rural town in the Western United States with plantations in the U.S. South. Through this connection, however, we see a timely conversation surrounding state's rights, limited government, unpaid and forced labor, and Manifest Destiny in the Antebellum South and the ways in which these values came to shape new towns in the U.S. West. As a result, archives in the region have historically tended to overemphasize heroic stories of land-owning Protestant settlers, and silence the stories of im/migrant laborers, prisoners, and others removed from society. This dissertation has attempted to understand how this archival dissonance came about, as well as advocate for the communities who have been prevented from narrating their own stories. By understanding these connections, we can imagine a more just world. Through a review of other U.S.-based community-driven archives, I explore what an abolitionist, community-driven approach to archives might look like in the San Joaquin Valley context.
What consequences materialize when community-engaged projects tell benevolent stories from dominant communities? Does this create silences for exploited communities? How might silences further exacerbate exploitation? To what extent do archival silences reify the conditions which allow labor exploitation, slavery, and prisons? What does it look like for archival work to be in service of the abolition of oppressive systems? What does an ethics of care in the archives look like in the San Joaquin Valley context? Altogether, the dissertation attempts to understand what is politically and socially at stake by how we build archival collections, what cultural and institutional limitations have prevented the UC Merced Library from materially realizing these stakes, and what the library can do to do right by the San Joaquin Valley's most exploited communities.