Introduction

Several studies report that pulmonary oxygen uptake (V̇O 2 ) at the respiratory compensation point (RCP) is equivalent to the V̇O 2 at critical power (CP), suggesting that the variables can be used interchangeably to demarcate the threshold between heavy and severe intensity domains. However, if RCP is a valid surrogate for CP, their values should correspond even when assessed in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in whom the "normal" mechanisms linking CP and RCP are impeded. The aim of this study was to compare V̇O 2 at CP with V̇O 2 at RCP in patients with COPD.

Methods

Twenty-two COPD patients (14 male/8 female; forced expiratory volume in 1 s, 46% ± 17% pred) performed ramp-incremental cycle ergometry to intolerance (5-10 W·min -1 ) for the determination of gas exchange threshold (GET) and RCP. CP was calculated from the asymptote of the hyperbolic power-duration relationship from 3-5 constant-power exercise tests to intolerance. CP was validated with a 20-min constant-power ride.

Results

GET was identified in 20 of 22 patients at a V̇O 2 of 0.93 ± 0.18 L·min -1 (75% ± 13% V̇O 2peak ), whereas RCP was identified in just 3 of 22 patients at a V̇O 2 of 1.40 ± 0.39 L·min -1 (85% ± 2% V̇O 2peak ). All patients completed constant-power trials with no difference in peak physiological responses relative to ramp-incremental exercise ( P > 0.05). CP was 46 ± 22 W, which elicited a V̇O 2 of 1.04 ± 0.29 L·min -1 (90% ± 9% V̇O 2peak ) during the validation ride. The difference in V̇O 2 at 15 and 20 min of the validation ride was 0.00 ± 0.04 L, which was not different from a hypothesized mean of 0 ( P = 0.856), thereby indicating a V̇O 2 steady state.

Conclusions

In COPD patients, who present with cardiopulmonary and/or respiratory-mechanical dysfunction, CP can be determined in the absence of RCP. Accordingly, CP and RCP are not equivalent in this group.

Respiratory function has become a global health priority. Not only is chronic respiratory disease a leading cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality, but the COVID-19 pandemic has heightened attention on respiratory health and the means of enhancing it. Subsequently, and inevitably, the respiratory system has become a target of the multi-trillion-dollar health and wellness industry. Numerous commercial, respiratory-related interventions are now coupled to therapeutic and/or ergogenic claims that vary in their plausibility: from the reasonable to the absurd. Moreover, legitimate and illegitimate claims are often conflated in a wellness space that lacks regulation. The abundance of interventions, the range of potential therapeutic targets in the respiratory system, and the wealth of research that varies in quality, all confound the ability for health and exercise professionals to make informed risk-to-benefit assessments with their patients and clients. This review focuses on numerous commercial interventions that purport to improve respiratory health, including nasal dilators, nasal breathing, and systematized breathing interventions (such as pursed-lips breathing), respiratory muscle training, canned oxygen, nutritional supplements, and inhaled L-menthol. For each intervention we describe the premise, examine the plausibility, and systematically contrast commercial claims against the published literature. The overarching aim is to assist health and exercise professionals to distinguish science from pseudoscience and make pragmatic and safe risk-to-benefit decisions.

Introduction

Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is partly characterized by diminished skeletal muscle oxidative capacity and concurrent dyslipidemia. It is unknown whether such metabolic derangements increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. This study explored associations among physical activity (PA), muscle oxidative capacity, and coronary artery calcium (CAC) in COPDGene participants.

Methods

Data from current and former smokers with COPD (n = 75) and normal spirometry (n = 70) were retrospectively analyzed. Physical activity was measured for seven days using triaxial accelerometry (steps/day and vector magnitude units [VMU]) along with the aggregate of self-reported PA amount and PA difficulty using the PROactive D-PPAC instrument. Muscle oxidative capacity (k) was assessed via near-infrared spectroscopy, and CAC was assessed via chest computerized tomography.

Results

Relative to controls, COPD patients exhibited higher CAC (median [IQR], 31 [0-431] vs 264 [40-799] HU; p = 0.003), lower k (mean ± SD = 1.66 ± 0.48 vs 1.25 ± 0.37 min^-1; p < 0.001), and lower D-PPAC total score (65.2 ± 9.9 vs 58.8 ± 13.2; p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis-adjusting for age, sex, race, diabetes, disease severity, hyperlipidemia, smoking status, and hypertension-revealed a significant negative association between CAC and D-PPAC total score (β, -0.05; p = 0.013), driven primarily by D-PPAC difficulty score (β, -0.03; p = 0.026). A 1 unit increase in D-PPAC total score was associated with a 5% lower CAC (p = 0.013). There was no association between CAC and either k, steps/day, VMU, or D-PPAC amount.

Conclusion

Patients with COPD and concomitantly elevated CAC exhibit greater perceptions of difficulty when performing daily activities. This may have implications for exercise adherence and risk of overall physical decline.

Assessing airway function during exercise provides useful information regarding mechanical properties of the airways and the extent of ventilatory limitation in COPD. The primary aim of this study was to use impulse oscillometry (IOS) to assess dynamic changes in airway impedance across a range of exercise intensities in patients with GOLD 1-4, before and after albuterol administration. A secondary aim was to assess the reproducibility of IOS measures during exercise. Fifteen patients with COPD (8 males/7 females; age = 66 ± 8 yr; prebronchodilator FEV₁ = 54.3 ± 23.6%Pred) performed incremental cycle ergometry before and 90 min after inhaled albuterol. Pulmonary ventilation and gas exchange were measured continuously, and IOS-derived indices of airway impedance were measured every 2 min immediately preceding inspiratory capacity maneuvers. Test-retest reproducibility of exercise IOS was assessed as mean difference between replicate tests in five healthy subjects (3 males/2 females). At rest and during incremental exercise, albuterol significantly increased airway reactance (X₅) and decreased airway resistance (R₅, R₅-R₂₀), impedance (Z₅), and end-expiratory lung volume (60% ± 12% vs. 58% ± 12% TLC, main effect P = 0.003). At peak exercise, there were moderate-to-strong associations between IOS variables and IC, and between IOS variables and concavity in the expiratory limb of the spontaneous flow-volume curve. Exercise IOS exhibited moderate reproducibility in healthy subjects which was strongest with R₅ (mean diff. = -0.01 ± 0.05 kPa/L/s; ICC = 0.68), R₅-R₂₀ (mean diff. = -0.004 ± 0.028 kPa/L/s; ICC = 0.65), and Z₅ (mean diff. = -0.006 ± 0.021 kPa/L/s; ICC = 0.69). In patients with COPD, exercise evoked increases in airway resistance and decreases in reactance that were ameliorated by inhaled bronchodilators. The technique of exercise IOS may aid in the clinical assessment of dynamic airway function during exercise.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study provides a novel, mechanistic insight into dynamic airway function during exercise in COPD, before and after inhaled bronchodilators. The use of impulse oscillometry (IOS) to evaluate airway function is unique among exercise studies. We show strong correlations among IOS variables, dynamic hyperinflation, and shape-changes in the spontaneous expiratory flow-volume curve. This approach may aid in the clinical assessment of airway function during exercise.

Background

Slow heart rate recovery (HRR) after exercise is associated with autonomic dysfunction and increased mortality. What HRR criterion at 1-minute after a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) best defines pulmonary impairment?.

Study design and methods

A total of 5008 phase 2 COPDGene (NCT00608764) participants with smoking history were included. A total of 2127 had COPD and, of these, 385 were followed-up 5-years later. Lung surgery, transplant, bronchiectasis, atrial fibrillation, heart failure and pacemakers were exclusionary. HR was measured from pulse oximetry at end-walk and after 1-min seated recovery. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) identified optimal HRR cut-off. Generalized linear regression determined HRR association with spirometry, chest CT, symptoms and exacerbations.

Results

HRR after 6MWT (bt/min) was categorized in quintiles: ≤5 (23.0% of participants), 6-10 (20.7%), 11-15 (18.9%), 16-22 (18.5%) and ≥23 (18.9%). Compared to HRR≤5, HRR≥11 was associated with (p<0.001): lower pre-walk HR and 1-min post HR; greater end-walk HR; greater 6MWD; greater FEV₁%pred; lower airway wall area and wall thickness. HRR was positively associated with FEV₁%pred and negatively associated with airway wall thickness. An optimal HRR ≤10 bt/min yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.62 (95% CI 0.58-0.66) for identifying FEV₁<30%pred. HRR≥11 bt/min was the lowest HRR associated with consistently less impairment in 6MWT, spirometry and CT variables. In COPD, HRR≤10 bt/min was associated with (p<0.001): ≥2 exacerbations in the previous year (OR=1.76[1.33-2.34]); CAT≥10 (OR=1.42[1.18-1.71]); mMRC≥2 (OR=1.42[1.19-1.69]); GOLD 4 (OR=1.98[1.44-2.73]) and GOLD D (OR=1.51[1.18-1.95]). HRR≤10 bt/min was predicted COPD exacerbations at 5-year follow-up (RR=1.83[1.07-3.12], P=0.027).

Conclusion

HRR≤10 bt/min after 6MWT in COPD is associated with more severe expiratory flow limitation, airway wall thickening, worse dyspnoea and quality of life, and future exacerbations, suggesting that an abnormal HRR≤10 bt/min after a 6MWT may be used in a comprehensive assessment in COPD for risk of severity, symptoms and future exacerbations.

Background

Lower heart rate (HR) increases during exercise and slower HR recovery (HRR) after exercise are markers of worse autonomic function that may be associated with risk of acute respiratory events (ARE).

Methods

Data from 6-min walk testing (6MWT) in COPDGene were used to calculate the chronotropic index (CI) [(HR immediately post 6MWT - resting HR)/((220 - age) - resting HR)] and HRR at 1 min after 6MWT completion. We used zero-inflated negative binomial regression to test associations of CI and HRR with rates of any ARE (requiring steroids and/or antibiotics) and severe ARE (requiring emergency department visit or hospitalization), among all participants and in spirometry subgroups (normal, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], and preserved ratio with impaired spirometry).

Results

Among 4,484 participants, mean follow-up time was 4.1 years, and 1,966 had COPD. Among all participants, CI-6MWT was not associated with rate of any ARE [adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 0.98 (0.95-1.01)], but higher CI-6MWT was associated with lower rate of severe ARE [0.95 (0.92-0.99)]. Higher HRR was associated with a lower rate of both any ARE [0.97 (0.95-0.99)] and severe ARE [0.95 (0.92-0.98)]. Results were similar in the COPD spirometry subgroup.

Conclusion

Heart rate measures derived from 6MWT tests may have utility in predicting risk of acute respiratory events and COPD exacerbations.