Skip to main content
Intersection of Living in a Rural Versus Urban Area and Race/Ethnicity in Explaining Access to Health Care in the United States.
Published Web Location
http://ucelinks.cdlib.org:8888/sfx_local?sid=google&auinit=JT&aulast=Caldwell&atitle=Intersection+of+living+in+a+rural+versus+urban+area+and+race/ethnicity+in+explaining+access+to+health+care+in+the+United+States&id=doi:10.2105/AJPH.2016.303212&title=American+Journal+of+Public+Health&volume=106&issue=8&date=2016&spage=1463&issn=0090-0036No data is associated with this publication.
Abstract
Objectives
To examine whether living in a rural versus urban area differentially exposes populations to social conditions associated with disparities in access to health care.Methods
We linked Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2005-2010) data to geographic data from the American Community Survey (2005-2009) and Area Health Resource File (2010). We categorized census tracts as rural and urban by using the Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes. Respondent sample sizes ranged from 49 839 to 105 306. Outcomes were access to a usual source of health care, cholesterol screening, cervical screening, dental visit within recommended intervals, and health care needs met.Results
African Americans in rural areas had lower odds of cholesterol screening (odds ratio[OR] = 0.37; 95% confidence interval[CI] = 0.25, 0.57) and cervical screening (OR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.29, 0.80) than African Americans in urban areas. Whites had fewer screenings and dental visits in rural versus urban areas. There were mixed results for which racial/ethnic group had better access.Conclusions
Rural status confers additional disadvantage for most of the health care use measures, independently of poverty and health care supply.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.