California Center for Innovative Transportation (CCIT)
Parent: California Partners for Advanced Transportation Technology
eScholarship stats: History by Item for June through September, 2026
| Item | Title | Total requests | 2026-09 | 2026-08 | 2026-07 | 2026-06 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2kh944sh | I-880 Corridor Management Plan Demonstration | 412 | 167 | 39 | 186 | 20 |
| 524799xg | Mobile Millennium: GPS Mobile Phones as Traffic Probes, California Networked Traveler - Safe Trip 21 Phase II | 225 | 54 | 60 | 39 | 72 |
| 52m292mq | Promoting Research Results and New Technologies: Making the Case for Accelerated Deployment | 216 | 46 | 49 | 49 | 72 |
| 56q9c13s | Travel Times on Changeable Message Signs | 201 | 45 | 53 | 32 | 71 |
| 99h759nr | Mobile Century Final Reportfor TO 1021 and TO 1029: A Traffic Sensing Field Experiment Using GPS Mobile Phones | 191 | 33 | 42 | 42 | 74 |
| 5vs4x8dv | Travel Times on Changeable Message SignsVolume Ill - Travel Time | 190 | 37 | 35 | 40 | 78 |
| 7nj655mh | Evaluation of Automated Workzone Information System (AWIS) CHIPS(Computerized Highway Information Processing System) | 180 | 34 | 62 | 33 | 51 |
| 7gf8q75r | Corridor Management Plan Demonstration | 174 | 30 | 41 | 34 | 69 |
| 5dc02196 | Freeway Performance Measurement System(PeMS), PeMS 6.5 | 170 | 29 | 47 | 35 | 59 |
| 8zq5c2gc | Industry Forum on Travel Times | 167 | 36 | 39 | 36 | 56 |
| 5xs954m4 | Travel Times on Changeable Message Signs Volume II - Evaluation of Transit signs | 166 | 31 | 41 | 41 | 53 |
| 2r0685zr | Use of Detection Data to PromotePerformance Measurement (PeMS Training) | 164 | 28 | 35 | 44 | 57 |
| 2g16f972 | Next-Generation HICOMP System | 158 | 28 | 34 | 32 | 64 |
| 7875869g | Innovative Transportation Products and Services, Final Report | 146 | 26 | 38 | 29 | 53 |
| 2x45j6dh | Freeway Performance Measurement System (PeMS), PeMS 6: Final Report for CCIT TO 15 | 105 | 39 | 47 | 4 | 15 |
| 278292j9 | Portable Advanced Traveler Information Systems | 94 | 21 | 55 | 5 | 13 |
| 3qq0p8bc | Monitoring of High-Occupancy VehicleLanes in Districts 3 & 4 | 86 | 33 | 27 | 10 | 16 |
| 1449t1qn | Berkeley Highway Lab, Final Report | 85 | 21 | 32 | 11 | 21 |
| 178070g1 | Innovative Corridors Initiative:Business Model Analysis | 83 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 20 |
| 2r33959s | Homeland Security: Keeping Abreast of Transportation Security Technologies and Best Practices | 79 | 13 | 19 | 14 | 33 |
| 1x56g28v | Statewide Travel Times - Business Case & Technology Deployment | 77 | 26 | 19 | 16 | 16 |
| 3n86j1hk | Privately-‐Provided Commuter Bus Services | 77 | 16 | 28 | 13 | 20 |
| 3q99w7pk | Efficient Deployment of Advanced Public Transit Systems (EDAPTS) | 71 | 18 | 22 | 10 | 21 |
| 8m2970d1 | Effectiveness of Information and Control ITS Field Elements on Commuter Trips | 71 | 18 | 15 | 16 | 22 |
| 5nj090ws | Innovative Corridors Initiative:Call for Submissions Process and Evaluation | 70 | 13 | 23 | 7 | 27 |
| 0jm505mg | Rural Issues with Optimal Sensor Placement for TransportationApplications | 69 | 14 | 19 | 16 | 20 |
| 6ht400ns | Freeway Performance MeasurementSystem (PeMs), PeMS 7.0 | 62 | 23 | 13 | 9 | 17 |
| 0h76d7vq | Systems Engineering | 57 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 15 |
| 3rr8z7d5 | Travel Times on Changeable Message Signs in District 4 | 53 | 17 | 16 | 6 | 14 |
| 40v6w8ng | Optimal Sensor Requirements | 43 | 9 | 11 | 8 | 15 |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.