Research Brief
Parent: Safe Transportation Research & Education Center
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for June through September, 2026
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98r16803 | An Early Analysis of Speed Safety Camera Program Rollout in California | 365 | 173 | 192 | 47.4% |
| 95g4w441 | 2025 California Traffic Safety Survey Summary | 328 | 120 | 208 | 36.6% |
| 38b4b3p6 | Pairing Speed Limit Reductions and Infrastructure to Lower Fatal and Serious (FSI) Crashes | 203 | 79 | 124 | 38.9% |
| 1sz522bj | Equitable Transportation Planning for Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety through the Use of the Safe System Approach | 177 | 40 | 137 | 22.6% |
| 9b88z0gs | Connecting Public Health and Transportation - Applying Crowdsourcing and Community Engagement Principles to Traffic Safety | 158 | 47 | 111 | 29.7% |
| 8x22b662 | The Emergence of Shared E-Scooters: Prioritizing Safety | 150 | 21 | 129 | 14.0% |
| 022007tv | Towards a Safer California: Addressing the Road Safety Needs of Older Adults | 147 | 32 | 115 | 21.8% |
| 4489j561 | Advancing Youth Helmet Adoption Through Community-Based Programming | 146 | 55 | 91 | 37.7% |
| 1rx0g3z7 | Impact of the Community Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Training: Program Insights from the 2024 Follow-Up Survey | 144 | 62 | 82 | 43.1% |
| 37b6g9wt | California Safe System Institute for Road Safety Executive Summary | 141 | 38 | 103 | 27.0% |
| 0c891851 | Impact of the Community Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Training: Program Insights from the 2025 Follow-Up Survey | 131 | 41 | 90 | 31.3% |
| 0sd470wf | Peer Exchange Series 2024: My community is eager to collaborate and grow! Where do we go from here? | 119 | 18 | 101 | 15.1% |
| 02t3v0x5 | Shared Responsibility for Road Safety in Safe Systems Context | 114 | 62 | 52 | 54.4% |
| 5q3317ch | Mobility Safety for California’s Affordable Housing Residents: Co-locating Improvements | 108 | 45 | 63 | 41.7% |
| 1xj3p75j | Community Engagement at the Intersection of Public Health and Transportation: Highlighting Community Based Organizations’ Use of the Promotores Model for Engaging Community Members in the Field of Transportation | 106 | 30 | 76 | 28.3% |
| 19j469fp | Impact of the Community Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Training: Program Insights from the 2023 Follow-Up Survey | 94 | 22 | 72 | 23.4% |
| 17s2q5p4 | Peer Influence and Perceptions of Safety | 93 | 23 | 70 | 24.7% |
| 69j572p9 | The Goal of Road Safety in the Safe Systems Context | 91 | 29 | 62 | 31.9% |
| 7481v78s | Perceptions of Bicycle Safety: A Data and User-Experience Approach | 89 | 23 | 66 | 25.8% |
| 3pf6g2q1 | Towards a Better Understanding of Best Implementation Practice for the Community Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Training Program | 87 | 39 | 48 | 44.8% |
| 5t075099 | Motor vehicle speed as a risk factor in pedestrian safety | 87 | 20 | 67 | 23.0% |
| 9js8k3sr | Complete Streets and their effect on increasing safety for all road-users. | 80 | 10 | 70 | 12.5% |
| 0843q0kt | Community Trainings at Work: An Evaluation of Community Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Trainings | 79 | 24 | 55 | 30.4% |
| 694622qc | The State of E-Bikes in California: A review of emerging policies, programs, and crash reporting | 62 | 16 | 46 | 25.8% |
| 9n2201st | The Influence of Alcohol Outlet Proximity on Pedestrian Injury Incidence: Insights from Literature | 60 | 14 | 46 | 23.3% |
| 1c37n79b | Why Don't Women Cycle? A Case Study of Women's Perception of Cycling in San Francisco | 58 | 16 | 42 | 27.6% |
| 2r62q36m | Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Research Brief | 55 | 12 | 43 | 21.8% |
| 4gr743v5 | Autonomous Vehicles and Vulnerable Road User Safety | 44 | 8 | 36 | 18.2% |
| 25v8f39t | Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Research Brief | 43 | 9 | 34 | 20.9% |
| 5m21s7vh | Impact of the Community Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program (CPBSP): 2026 Program insights using the Kirkpatrick Model | 31 | 4 | 27 | 12.9% |
| 5f18t1xm | Identifying Planning Challenges in Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Infrastructure in Rural and UrbanCommunities: A Sonoma County Case Study | 27 | 6 | 21 | 22.2% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.