Research Reports
Parent: University of California Pavement Research Center
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for January through April, 2025
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8g87z17r | Life Cycle Assessment of Asphalt Binder, Warm Mix Asphalt Additives, and Bonded Concrete Overlay of Asphalt for California Conditions | 264 | 76 | 188 | 28.8% |
| 80c7d0rc | Fatigue Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixes and Its Relationship to Asphalt Concrete Pavement Performance in California | 102 | 14 | 88 | 13.7% |
| 9gn079w4 | Analysis of Recycling Agent Effects on the Mechanical Properties of HMA with High Recycled Binder Ratios | 97 | 26 | 71 | 26.8% |
| 31n5j963 | Pavement Recycling: Shrinkage Crack Mitigation in Cement-Treated Pavement Layers — Phase 2a Literature Review and FDR-C Test Road Construction and Monitoring | 81 | 23 | 58 | 28.4% |
| 1870m3g9 | Optimizing Rubberized Open-graded Friction Course (RHMA-O) Mix Designs for Water Quality Benefits: Phase I: Literature Review | 73 | 12 | 61 | 16.4% |
| 39w1j16d | Development of Performance-Based Specifications for Asphalt Rubber Binder: Phase 2g Testing of Plant-Sampled Binders and RHMA-G Mixes | 70 | 17 | 53 | 24.3% |
| 52d1d1q5 | Preliminary Study on Developing a Surrogate Performance-Related Test for Fatigue Cracking of Asphalt Pavements | 70 | 22 | 48 | 31.4% |
| 8k31f512 | UCPRC Life Cycle Assessment Methodology and Initial Case Studies for Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions for Pavement Preservation Treatments with Different Rolling Resistance | 69 | 17 | 52 | 24.6% |
| 0bx8b68t | Increasing Crumb Rubber Usage by Adding Small Amounts of Crumb Rubber Modifier in Hot-Mix Asphalt. Phase 1: Laboratory Tests and CalME Simulations | 67 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% |
| 460234g0 | Updates to CalME and Calibration of Cracking Models | 67 | 12 | 55 | 17.9% |
| 6bv7d7t6 | Pavement ME Sensitivity Analysis (Version 2.5.3) | 65 | 17 | 48 | 26.2% |
| 40j1p8k7 | Laboratory Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Asphalt Concrete Reinforced with Aramid Synthetic Fibers | 64 | 18 | 46 | 28.1% |
| 8zc70841 | Investigation of the Effect of Pavement Deflection on Vehicle Fuel Consumption: Field Testing and Empirical Analysis | 64 | 13 | 51 | 20.3% |
| 4mq5p6sd | Development of Performance-Based Specifications for Asphalt Rubber Binder: Interim Report on Phase 1 and Phase 2 Testing | 63 | 25 | 38 | 39.7% |
| 6kf121z3 | Drying Shrinkage Response of Full-Scale Thin Concrete Overlay on Asphalt Sections | 61 | 6 | 55 | 9.8% |
| 8378s3vk | Full-Depth Pavement Reclamation with Foamed Asphalt: Final Report | 60 | 19 | 41 | 31.7% |
| 03p4h24f | Pavement ME JPCP Transverse Cracking Model Calibration and Design Catalog Framework (Version 2.5.5) | 56 | 18 | 38 | 32.1% |
| 24p1v6fd | Impact of Silo Storage on the Performance of Plant-Produced Mixes Containing High Content of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement or Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles | 55 | 12 | 43 | 21.8% |
| 7vg1c54z | Superpave Implementation Phase II: Comparison of Performance-Related Test Results | 55 | 7 | 48 | 12.7% |
| 0b9635gm | eLCAP: A Web Application for Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Pavements | 54 | 10 | 44 | 18.5% |
| 1720m3qt | Pavement Recycling: Shrinkage Crack Mitigation in Cement-Treated Pavement Layers—Phase 2b Laboratory Testing and Performance Modeling | 53 | 15 | 38 | 28.3% |
| 7wq3s753 | First-Level Analysis of Phase 1 Heavy Vehicle Simulator and Laboratory Testing on Four RHMA-G Mixes to Investigate Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size, Layer Thickness, and Performance with Aggregate Replacement from Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement | 53 | 13 | 40 | 24.5% |
| 6vc4p8xt | Contact Stresses of Pneumatic Tires Measured with the Vehicle-Road Surface Pressure Transducer Array (VRSPTA) System for the University of California at Berkeley (UCB) and the Nevada Automotive Test Center (NATC) | 51 | 24 | 27 | 47.1% |
| 3xw222tv | CAL/APT Program: Asphalt Treated Permeable Base (ATPB), Laboratory Tests, Performance Predictions and Evaluation of Caltrans and Other Agencies Experience | 49 | 10 | 39 | 20.4% |
| 0x08g456 | CAL/APT Program--Comparison of Caltrans and AASHTO Pavement Design Methods | 45 | 5 | 40 | 11.1% |
| 86f4f3sr | Concrete Overlay on Asphalt Pilot Project at Woodland SR 113: Construction | 44 | 6 | 38 | 13.6% |
| 9t31c0k3 | Climate Regions for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design in California and Expected Effects on Performance | 44 | 1 | 43 | 2.3% |
| 6cj9z9s3 | Water Quality and Toxicity Evaluation of Discharge Generated from Asphalt Pavement Surfacing Materials | 42 | 13 | 29 | 31.0% |
| 8242m1wq | Investigation of Design and Construction Issues for Long Life Concrete Pavement Strategies | 42 | 8 | 34 | 19.0% |
| 9wg2q1v1 | Analysis of 30 Years of Pavement Temperatures using the Enhanced Integrated Climate Model (EICM) | 42 | 5 | 37 | 11.9% |
| 00t7h09r | Freight-Truck-Pavement Interaction, Logistics, and Economics: Final Phase 1 Report (Tasks 1–6) | 41 | 6 | 35 | 14.6% |
| 11s1g5km | Accelerated Test Method for Measuring Sulfate Resistance of Hydraulic Cements for Caltrans LLPRS Program | 41 | 2 | 39 | 4.9% |
| 1rc624m9 | Reflective Cracking Study: Second-Level Analysis Report | 41 | 10 | 31 | 24.4% |
| 3p8312vs | Simulation of Cumulative Annual Impact of Pavement Structural Response on Vehicle Fuel Economy for California Test Sections | 38 | 4 | 34 | 10.5% |
| 4588h3jp | Pre- and Postconstruction Analysis of the Interstate 15 (Devore) Concrete Pavement Reconstruction Project | 38 | 8 | 30 | 21.1% |
| 6pc4478z | Pavement Recycling: Shrinkage Crack Mitigation in Cement-Treated Pavement Layers – Phase 1 Laboratory Testing | 38 | 14 | 24 | 36.8% |
| 78b85274 | Vision for Caltrans/UC-Berkeley Partnered Pavement Research Center | 38 | 7 | 31 | 18.4% |
| 21b4m2zp | Reflective Cracking Study: Initial Construction, Phase 1 HVS Testing, and Overlay Construction | 37 | 5 | 32 | 13.5% |
| 72q3c143 | Development of Recommended Guidelines for Preservation Treatments for Bicycle Routes | 37 | 6 | 31 | 16.2% |
| 49r9d32g | Calibration of <em>CalME</em> models using WesTrack Performance Data | 35 | 2 | 33 | 5.7% |
| 21w7n8sn | Investigation of Noise, Ride Quality and Macrotexture Trends for Asphalt Pavement Surfaces: Summary of Six Years of Measurements | 34 | 7 | 27 | 20.6% |
| 72d3q2h4 | Evaluation of Grind and Groove (Next Generation Concrete Surface) Pilot Projects in California | 34 | 11 | 23 | 32.4% |
| 1qb0924p | Development of Performance-Based Specifications for Asphalt Rubber Binder: Phase 2g Additional Testing of Five Plant-Sampled Binders and RHMA G Mixes | 33 | 7 | 26 | 21.2% |
| 3dp663w0 | Surface Treatment Macrotexture and Bicycle Ride Quality | 33 | 9 | 24 | 27.3% |
| 0q14d699 | Data Mining of the Caltrans Pavement Management System (PMS) Database | 32 | 1 | 31 | 3.1% |
| 3z31q57r | Pavement ME Evaluation of the NCHRP 1-61 Thin Concrete Overlay on Asphalt Sections | 32 | 7 | 25 | 21.9% |
| 4sh361xx | Investigation of Noise, Durability, Permeability, and Friction Performance Trends for Asphaltic Pavement Surface Types: First- and Second-Year Results | 32 | 9 | 23 | 28.1% |
| 5q7484fp | Caltrans Accelerated Pavement Test (CAL/APT) Program Summary Report Six Year Period: 1994-2000 | 32 | 12 | 20 | 37.5% |
| 1v52z3nq | Rutting of Caltrans Asphalt Concrete and Asphalt-Rubber Hot MixUnder Different Wheels, Tires and Temperatures – AcceleratedPavement Testing Evaluation | 31 | 2 | 29 | 6.5% |
| 4bd2t7fn | Analysis and Estimation of Effective Built-In Temperature Difference for North Tangent Slabs: Data Analysis from the Palmdale, California Rigid Pavement Test Site | 31 | 1 | 30 | 3.2% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.