Open Access Policy Deposits
Parent: Department of Philosophy
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for January through April, 2025
Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
27k2f44p | Another Problem in Possible World Semantics | 307 | 20 | 287 | 6.5% |
2vp2x4rx | A Semantic Hierarchy for Intuitionistic Logic | 249 | 32 | 217 | 12.9% |
9ts1b228 | Possibility Semantics | 137 | 35 | 102 | 25.5% |
9hd0g86c | Arrow's Decisive Coalitions | 96 | 15 | 81 | 15.6% |
6xq0f176 | Reply | 85 | 3 | 82 | 3.5% |
2nn3c35x | The Logic of Comparative Cardinality | 77 | 16 | 61 | 20.8% |
7kr412rz | Trust, anger, resentment, forgiveness: On blame and its reasons | 76 | 17 | 59 | 22.4% |
5jw0p2mz | Axiomatization in the Meaning Sciences | 74 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% |
1m3156ps | Logics of Imprecise Comparative Probability | 71 | 19 | 52 | 26.8% |
6w21t4jn | Inquisitive Intuitionistic Logic | 71 | 15 | 56 | 21.1% |
2g73d7qv | Voting Theory in the Lean Theorem Prover | 70 | 9 | 61 | 12.9% |
4f11t8k3 | School in the time of Covid | 70 | 2 | 68 | 2.9% |
2h5069pq | A Bimodal Perspective on Possibility Semantics | 69 | 16 | 53 | 23.2% |
303338xr | A Note on Algebraic Semantics for S5 with Propositional Quantifiers | 68 | 18 | 50 | 26.5% |
9v11r0dq | Possibility Frames and Forcing for Modal Logic (June 2016) | 66 | 11 | 55 | 16.7% |
82w2d085 | Simplifying the Surprise Exam | 62 | 15 | 47 | 24.2% |
5039n29t | A partial-state space model of unawareness | 58 | 11 | 47 | 19.0% |
0ss5z8g3 | The Orthologic of Epistemic Modals | 55 | 16 | 39 | 29.1% |
40c139d1 | Preferential Structures for Comparative Probabilistic Reasoning | 55 | 9 | 46 | 16.4% |
46r5502v | A note on Murakami’s theorems and incomplete social choice without the Pareto principle | 54 | 16 | 38 | 29.6% |
0379725f | On the Modal Logic of Subset and Superset: Tense Logic over Medvedev Frames | 53 | 21 | 32 | 39.6% |
2152w8k6 | Epistemic Closure and Epistemic Logic I: Relevant Alternatives and Subjunctivism | 53 | 6 | 47 | 11.3% |
2s0134zx | Locales, Nuclei, and Dragalin Frames | 53 | 19 | 34 | 35.8% |
57q7t509 | Compatibility, compossibility, and epistemic modality | 53 | 13 | 40 | 24.5% |
4w2083v3 | Three roads to complete lattices: orders, compatibility, polarity | 50 | 12 | 38 | 24.0% |
46w023hs | One Modal Logic to Rule Them All? | 49 | 18 | 31 | 36.7% |
00p6t2v4 | Choice-free Stone duality | 45 | 4 | 41 | 8.9% |
5462j5b6 | Possibility Frames and Forcing for Modal Logic | 45 | 12 | 33 | 26.7% |
69f4t1wg | Algebraic and topological semantics for inquisitive logic via choice-free duality | 41 | 10 | 31 | 24.4% |
8br2b074 | Inferring Probability Comparisons | 40 | 11 | 29 | 27.5% |
11c0x4n5 | Figure and Ground in Logical Space | 39 | 9 | 30 | 23.1% |
01p9x1hv | Complete Additivity and Modal Incompleteness | 37 | 5 | 32 | 13.5% |
91f717px | Fallibilism and Multiple Paths to Knowledge (Extended Version) | 36 | 6 | 30 | 16.7% |
07v9360j | One Modal Logic to Rule Them All? (Extended Technical Report) | 35 | 6 | 29 | 17.1% |
4z83s9z9 | Compatibility and accessibility: lattice representations for semantics of non-classical and modal logics | 33 | 6 | 27 | 18.2% |
2sf7x271 | A note on cancellation axioms for comparative probability | 31 | 4 | 27 | 12.9% |
37z3r3t4 | Split Cycle: A New Condorcet Consistent Voting Method Independent of Clones and Immune to Spoilers | 30 | 9 | 21 | 30.0% |
9pm9t4vp | Partiality and Adjointness in Modal Logic | 30 | 11 | 19 | 36.7% |
8bp759nc | A fundamental non-classical logic | 21 | 4 | 17 | 19.0% |
1722x1tx | Précis of The View from Here | 19 | 4 | 15 | 21.1% |
4rc8v84j | Replies to Raffman, Stanley, and Wright | 18 | 7 | 11 | 38.9% |
7gr812wb | I—Vagueness as Indecision | 18 | 3 | 15 | 16.7% |
4wh0c3br | Replies to Symposiasts on The View from Here | 17 | 2 | 15 | 11.8% |
7sc8x8c4 | Indicative Conditionals and Dynamic Epistemic Logic | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% |
8pp4d94t | Complete Additivity and Modal Incompleteness | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% |
64k4m60p | On Probabilistic Knowledge | 10 | 3 | 7 | 30.0% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.