Policy and Economics
Parent: University of California Energy Institute
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for July through October, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1h6141nj | The Effect of Improved Fuel Economy on Vehicle Miles Traveled: Estimating the Rebound Effect Using U.S. State Data, 1966-2001 | 157 | 17 | 140 | 10.8% |
| 4g746523 | Economic and Emissions Implications of Load-Based, Source-based and First-seller Emissions Trading Programs under California AB32 | 69 | 35 | 34 | 50.7% |
| 3fg2r29s | Understanding Crude Oil Prices | 68 | 29 | 39 | 42.6% |
| 0wj3x8bm | Does Britain or The United States Have the Right Gas Tax? | 42 | 8 | 34 | 19.0% |
| 56b1j52f | Dynamics of the Oil Transition: Modeling Capacity, Costs, and Emissions | 41 | 19 | 22 | 46.3% |
| 19h474cb | How Good are Supply Function Equilibrium Models: An Empirical Analysis of the ERCOT Balancing Market | 39 | 17 | 22 | 43.6% |
| 5cg3d8q0 | Interest Group Representation in Administrative Institutions: The Impact of Consumer Advocates and Elected Commissioners on Regulatory Policy in the United States | 39 | 5 | 34 | 12.8% |
| 744256hh | Road Pricing and Public Transport | 39 | 16 | 23 | 41.0% |
| 8zk9d9sb | The Impact of Residential Density on Vehicle Usage and Energy Consumption | 37 | 2 | 35 | 5.4% |
| 4bz9j4wr | Modeling and Computing Two-settlement Oligopolistic Equilibrium in a Congested Electricity Network | 36 | 10 | 26 | 27.8% |
| 8tq6z6t0 | Ensuring Generation Adequacy in Competitive Electricity Markets | 35 | 8 | 27 | 22.9% |
| 8v9458m0 | An Analysis of Measures to Reduce the Life-Cycle Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of California's Personal Computers | 32 | 7 | 25 | 21.9% |
| 7xg1t4ch | Why Do Companies Rent Green? Real Property and Corporate Social Responsibility | 31 | 2 | 29 | 6.5% |
| 1v97n5k6 | Generation Adequacy Via Call Options Obligations: Safe Passage to the Promised Land | 24 | 7 | 17 | 29.2% |
| 7x04g2md | Deregulation Process, Governance Structures and Efficiency: The U.S. Electric Utility Sector | 23 | 4 | 19 | 17.4% |
| 8fj103fv | The Natural Number of Forward Markets for Electricity | 23 | 2 | 21 | 8.7% |
| 77z7z8bk | Joint Energy and Reserves Auction with Opportunity Cost Payment for Reserves | 20 | 3 | 17 | 15.0% |
| 7bh5f7rn | Electricity Merger Policy in the Shadow of Regulation | 20 | 3 | 17 | 15.0% |
| 3v30p0wh | Trust During an Energy Crisis | 19 | 3 | 16 | 15.8% |
| 7k19s9n4 | Public Support for Oil and Gas Drilling in California's Forests and Parks | 19 | 5 | 14 | 26.3% |
| 25w067h7 | Allocating Transmission to Mitigate Market Power in Electricity Markets | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% |
| 7kd0f0c5 | Deregulation and Resource Reconfiguration In The Electric Utility Industry | 16 | 3 | 13 | 18.8% |
| 3mn4v2r5 | Support for Offshore Oil and Gas Drilling among the California Public | 14 | 2 | 12 | 14.3% |
| 5nd825w4 | The 'Supply-of-Storage' for Natural Gas in California | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.