Documenting Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in State Employment

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for July through October, 2026

Item	Title	Total requests	Download	View-only	%Dnld
8z92s3dv	Colorado – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	265	49	216	18.5%
87g999g0	Specific Examples of Employment Discrimination by State and Local Governments, 1980-Present	199	20	179	10.1%
8br462pn	Louisiana – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	160	17	143	10.6%
6gr7q1x3	Virginia – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	159	51	108	32.1%
64c3c242	Washington – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	154	56	98	36.4%
6cz123ww	Estimates of LGBT Public Employees	153	19	134	12.4%
9xt0r3bk	Employment, Housing, and Public Accommodations Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Missouri	147	44	103	29.9%
3284n0n1	California – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	121	44	77	36.4%
97r3x9z0	Oregon – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	119	36	83	30.3%
0k93c8mh	Analysis of Scope and Enforcement of State Laws and Executive	116	28	88	24.1%
80n6v43m	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in West Virginia	116	43	73	37.1%
7vj6b5j1	Utah – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	108	52	56	48.1%
58j4w7k3	Voters’ Initiatives to Repeal or Prevent Laws Prohibiting Employment Discrimination Against LGBT People, 1974-Present	105	32	73	30.5%
2qh1v3b6	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Ohio	104	28	76	26.9%
0v3834qt	The Fiscal Impact of Extending Marriage to Same-Sex Couples in New Mexico	103	33	70	32.0%
0374s11t	Arizona – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	100	24	76	24.0%
8bc6p8sz	Idaho – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	100	8	92	8.0%
9t40q6gp	New Jersey– Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	95	19	76	20.0%
60g0c17c	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Pennsylvania	94	36	58	38.3%
4nr4p07n	Florida – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	91	45	46	49.5%
822731sp	Michigan – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	90	26	64	28.9%
8vv8v8gk	Congressional Record of Employment Discrimination Against LGBT Public Employees. 1994-2007.	89	24	65	27.0%
26n4n7mw	Kentucky – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	85	19	66	22.4%
6nn0v8zf	Analysis of Wage Gap Between LGB Public Employees and Their Co-Workers	82	42	40	51.2%
5bg181dt	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Utah	81	31	50	38.3%
8cs4m31v	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in South Carolina	80	23	57	28.8%
77c9p7p4	Indiana – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	79	18	61	22.8%
05g290fb	Kansas – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	78	27	51	34.6%
2073n8vf	Missouri – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	78	24	54	30.8%
0sz291bx	South Dakota – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	77	17	60	22.1%
15r3h9nh	South Carolina – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	76	21	55	27.6%
65f64807	Surveys of LGBT Public Employees and Their Co-Workers	76	22	54	28.9%
8q0889jp	Arkansas – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	75	17	58	22.7%
0qc2f3cd	Relationship of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity to Performance in the Workplace	73	15	58	20.5%
2kh787j1	Georgia – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	73	31	42	42.5%
7x94n7sc	Other Indicia of Animus Against LGBT People by State and Local	73	28	45	38.4%
1vt446zb	Alabama – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	71	18	53	25.4%
00z030c7	Texas – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	68	22	46	32.4%
42v9z2s5	Delaware – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	67	16	51	23.9%
53q3m8j0	North Carolina – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	67	11	56	16.4%
8k63q4cb	Nevada – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	67	28	39	41.8%
81k6b9jw	Tennessee – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	66	24	42	36.4%
1zg2v703	Illinois – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	65	16	49	24.6%
6f11j8jn	Wyoming – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	65	18	47	27.7%
6w0475m7	Connecticut – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	65	31	34	47.7%
5zt9h6vt	Local Laws and Government Policies Prohibiting Discrimination Based on Gender Identity in Maryland	64	24	40	37.5%
63k8x206	New Mexico – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	63	9	54	14.3%
7pw903n9	Pennsylvania – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	63	16	47	25.4%
2np5f38p	Vermont – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	62	12	50	19.4%
6r7085zv	Ohio – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	60	14	46	23.3%

Top

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.