Documenting Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in State Employment

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for March through June, 2026

Item	Title	Total requests	Download	View-only	%Dnld
87g999g0	Specific Examples of Employment Discrimination by State and Local Governments, 1980-Present	278	68	210	24.5%
97r3x9z0	Oregon – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	250	35	215	14.0%
6cz123ww	Estimates of LGBT Public Employees	215	77	138	35.8%
0374s11t	Arizona – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	212	55	157	25.9%
2qh1v3b6	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Ohio	185	73	112	39.5%
80n6v43m	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in West Virginia	182	78	104	42.9%
00z030c7	Texas – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	180	73	107	40.6%
822731sp	Michigan – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	166	54	112	32.5%
05g290fb	Kansas – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	164	71	93	43.3%
9xt0r3bk	Employment, Housing, and Public Accommodations Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Missouri	163	58	105	35.6%
8cs4m31v	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in South Carolina	160	69	91	43.1%
60g0c17c	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Pennsylvania	155	64	91	41.3%
5bg181dt	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Utah	153	70	83	45.8%
0v3834qt	The Fiscal Impact of Extending Marriage to Same-Sex Couples in New Mexico	149	69	80	46.3%
8br462pn	Louisiana – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	147	48	99	32.7%
64c3c242	Washington – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	146	36	110	24.7%
9t40q6gp	New Jersey– Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	143	56	87	39.2%
53q3m8j0	North Carolina – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	130	46	84	35.4%
63k8x206	New Mexico – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	130	45	85	34.6%
4nr4p07n	Florida – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	128	23	105	18.0%
1zg2v703	Illinois – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	123	37	86	30.1%
77c9p7p4	Indiana – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	122	33	89	27.0%
65f64807	Surveys of LGBT Public Employees and Their Co-Workers	121	60	61	49.6%
1704b2xm	Oklahoma – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	118	28	90	23.7%
7x94n7sc	Other Indicia of Animus Against LGBT People by State and Local	117	38	79	32.5%
2np5f38p	Vermont – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	116	44	72	37.9%
5zt9h6vt	Local Laws and Government Policies Prohibiting Discrimination Based on Gender Identity in Maryland	115	47	68	40.9%
6r7085zv	Ohio – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	110	34	76	30.9%
6gr7q1x3	Virginia – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	108	36	72	33.3%
42v9z2s5	Delaware – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	107	40	67	37.4%
58j4w7k3	Voters’ Initiatives to Repeal or Prevent Laws Prohibiting Employment Discrimination Against LGBT People, 1974-Present	106	49	57	46.2%
8vv8v8gk	Congressional Record of Employment Discrimination Against LGBT Public Employees. 1994-2007.	102	46	56	45.1%
5x11t2cn	Wisconsin – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation	101	30	71	29.7%
7pw903n9	Pennsylvania – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	100	48	52	48.0%
26n4n7mw	Kentucky – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	98	44	54	44.9%
27j6k9cd	Executive Summary	98	30	68	30.6%
2x66m049	Mississippi – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	98	32	66	32.7%
65865687	Administrative Complaints on the Basis of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity	97	32	65	33.0%
9v35p0s0	Findings of Widespread Discrimination Against LGBT People by State and Local Legislative Bodies, Commissions, and Elected Officials	95	36	59	37.9%
3284n0n1	California – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	94	51	43	54.3%
81k6b9jw	Tennessee – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	93	44	49	47.3%
33z8f2pf	State Courts, Federal Courts, and Legal Scholars Have Determined That LGBT People Have Experienced a Long History of Discrimination	91	40	51	44.0%
6nn0v8zf	Analysis of Wage Gap Between LGB Public Employees and Their Co-Workers	89	39	50	43.8%
43m481hp	Massachusetts – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	88	30	58	34.1%
66m2b8wn	Alaska – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	87	38	49	43.7%
6f11j8jn	Wyoming – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	85	42	43	49.4%
7vj6b5j1	Utah – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	85	33	52	38.8%
8k63q4cb	Nevada – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	85	28	57	32.9%
0qc2f3cd	Relationship of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity to Performance in the Workplace	83	44	39	53.0%
2kh787j1	Georgia – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	81	32	49	39.5%

Top

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.