Documenting Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in State Employment

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for May through August, 2026

Item	Title	Total requests	Download	View-only	%Dnld
97r3x9z0	Oregon – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	228	29	199	12.7%
6cz123ww	Estimates of LGBT Public Employees	182	58	124	31.9%
80n6v43m	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in West Virginia	137	39	98	28.5%
9xt0r3bk	Employment, Housing, and Public Accommodations Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Missouri	136	39	97	28.7%
0374s11t	Arizona – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	133	30	103	22.6%
822731sp	Michigan – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	132	34	98	25.8%
2qh1v3b6	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Ohio	126	38	88	30.2%
00z030c7	Texas – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	122	42	80	34.4%
8z92s3dv	Colorado – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	122	42	80	34.4%
0v3834qt	The Fiscal Impact of Extending Marriage to Same-Sex Couples in New Mexico	118	46	72	39.0%
8cs4m31v	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in South Carolina	111	33	78	29.7%
60g0c17c	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Pennsylvania	105	36	69	34.3%
8br462pn	Louisiana – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	105	36	69	34.3%
9t40q6gp	New Jersey– Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	105	37	68	35.2%
87g999g0	Specific Examples of Employment Discrimination by State and Local Governments, 1980-Present	103	32	71	31.1%
64c3c242	Washington – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	98	22	76	22.4%
63k8x206	New Mexico – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	93	33	60	35.5%
53q3m8j0	North Carolina – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	92	26	66	28.3%
8bc6p8sz	Idaho – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	91	9	82	9.9%
3284n0n1	California – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	90	41	49	45.6%
65f64807	Surveys of LGBT Public Employees and Their Co-Workers	88	35	53	39.8%
7x94n7sc	Other Indicia of Animus Against LGBT People by State and Local	84	25	59	29.8%
05g290fb	Kansas – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	83	29	54	34.9%
5bg181dt	Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Utah	83	32	51	38.6%
5zt9h6vt	Local Laws and Government Policies Prohibiting Discrimination Based on Gender Identity in Maryland	79	24	55	30.4%
6gr7q1x3	Virginia – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	79	20	59	25.3%
8vv8v8gk	Congressional Record of Employment Discrimination Against LGBT Public Employees. 1994-2007.	78	36	42	46.2%
0k93c8mh	Analysis of Scope and Enforcement of State Laws and Executive	77	29	48	37.7%
26n4n7mw	Kentucky – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	77	31	46	40.3%
4nr4p07n	Florida – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	76	30	46	39.5%
58j4w7k3	Voters’ Initiatives to Repeal or Prevent Laws Prohibiting Employment Discrimination Against LGBT People, 1974-Present	76	29	47	38.2%
6r7085zv	Ohio – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	75	28	47	37.3%
7pw903n9	Pennsylvania – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	74	31	43	41.9%
0qc2f3cd	Relationship of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity to Performance in the Workplace	73	36	37	49.3%
2np5f38p	Vermont – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	73	27	46	37.0%
42v9z2s5	Delaware – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	70	27	43	38.6%
81k6b9jw	Tennessee – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	69	30	39	43.5%
1704b2xm	Oklahoma – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	68	18	50	26.5%
6f11j8jn	Wyoming – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	67	31	36	46.3%
77c9p7p4	Indiana – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	67	15	52	22.4%
7vj6b5j1	Utah – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	67	23	44	34.3%
27j6k9cd	Executive Summary	66	17	49	25.8%
5x11t2cn	Wisconsin – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation	66	14	52	21.2%
1zg2v703	Illinois – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	65	15	50	23.1%
2x66m049	Mississippi – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	65	16	49	24.6%
66m2b8wn	Alaska – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	62	30	32	48.4%
65865687	Administrative Complaints on the Basis of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity	61	20	41	32.8%
8k63q4cb	Nevada – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	61	20	41	32.8%
16x5g2sc	Minnesota – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination	60	30	30	50.0%
6nn0v8zf	Analysis of Wage Gap Between LGB Public Employees and Their Co-Workers	60	28	32	46.7%

Top

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.