Malaria is an infectious disease which disproportionately effects children and pregnant women. These vulnerable populations are often excluded from clinical trials resulting in one-size-fits-all treatment regimens based on those established for a nonpregnant adult population. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models can be used to optimize dose selection as they define the drug exposure-response relationship. Additionally, these models are able to identify patient characteristics that cause alterations in the expected PK/PD profiles and through simulations can recommend changes to dosing which compensate for the differences. In this review, we examine how PK/PD models have been applied to optimize antimalarial dosing recommendations for young children, including those who are malnourished, pregnant women, and individuals receiving concomitant therapies such as those for HIV treatment. The malaria field has had great success in utilizing PK/PD models as a foundation to update treatment guidelines and propose the next generation of dosing regimens to investigate in clinical trials. We propose how the malaria field can continue to use modeling to improve therapies by further integrating PK data into clinical studies and including data on drug resistance and host immunity in PK/PD models. Finally, we suggest that other disease areas can achieve similar success in applying pharmacometrics to improve outcomes by implementing three key principals.

African children are at risk of malaria and malnutrition. We quantified relationships between malaria and malnutrition among young Ugandan children in a high malaria transmission region. Data were used from a randomized controlled trial where Ugandan HIV-unexposed (n = 393) and HIV-exposed (n = 186) children were randomized to receive no malaria chemoprevention, monthly sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or monthly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) from age 6-24 months, and then were followed off chemoprevention until age 36 months. Monthly height and weight, and time of incident malaria episodes were obtained; 89 children who received DP contributed piperaquine (PQ) concentrations. Malaria hazard was modeled using parametric survival analysis adjusted for repeated events, and height and weight were modeled using a Brody growth model. Among 579 children, stunting (height-for-age z-score [ZHA] < -2) was associated with a 17% increased malaria hazard (95% confidence interval [CI] 10-23%) compared with children with a ZHA of zero. DP was associated with a 35% lower malaria hazard (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], 0.65 [0.41-0.97]), compared to no chemoprevention. After accounting for PQ levels, stunted children who received DP had 2.1 times the hazard of malaria (HR [95% CI] 2.1 [1.6-3.0]) compared with children with a ZHA of zero who received DP. Each additional malaria episode was associated with a 0.4% reduced growth rate for height. Better dosing regimens are needed to optimize malaria prevention in malnourished populations, but, importantly, malaria chemoprevention may reduce the burden of malnutrition in early childhood.

Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) is highly protective against malaria in children, but is not standard in malaria-endemic countries. Optimal DP dosing regimens will maximize efficacy and reduce toxicity and resistance selection. We analyze piperaquine (PPQ) concentrations (n = 4573), malaria incidence data (n = 326), and P. falciparum drug resistance markers from a trial of children randomized to IPT with DP every 12 weeks (n = 184) or every 4 weeks (n = 96) from 2 to 24 months of age (NCT02163447). We use nonlinear mixed effects modeling to establish malaria protective PPQ levels and risk factors for suboptimal protection. Compared to DP every 12 weeks, DP every 4 weeks is associated with 95% protective efficacy (95% CI: 84-99%). A PPQ level of 15.4 ng/mL reduces the malaria hazard by 95%. Malnutrition reduces PPQ exposure. In simulations, we show that DP every 4 weeks is optimal across a range of transmission intensities, and age-based dosing improves malaria protection in young or malnourished children.

Clofazimine is recommended for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB), but there is currently no verified dosing guideline for its use in children. There is only limited safety and no pharmacokinetic (PK) data available for children. We aimed to characterize clofazimine PK and its relationship with QT-interval prolongation in children. An observational cohort study of South African children <18 years old routinely treated for RR-TB with a clofazimine-containing regimen was analyzed. Clofazimine 100 mg gelatin capsules were given orally once daily (≥20 kg body weight), every second day (10 to <20 kg), or thrice weekly (<10 kg). PK sampling and electrocardiograms were completed pre-dose and at 1, 4, and 10 hours post-dose, and the population PK and Fridericia-corrected QT (QTcF) interval prolongation were characterized. Fifty-four children contributed both PK and QTcF data, with a median age (2.5th-97.5th centiles) of 3.3 (0.5-15.6) years; five children were living with HIV. Weekly area under the time-concentration curve at steady state was 79.1 (15.0-271) mg.h/L compared to an adult target of 60.9 (56.0-66.6) mg.h/L. Children living with HIV had four times higher clearance compared to those without. No child had a QTcF ≥500 ms. A linear concentration-QTcF relationship was found, with a drug effect of 0.05 (0.027, 0.075) ms/µg/L. In some of the first PK data in children, we found clofazimine exposure using an off-label dosing strategy was higher in children versus adults. Clofazimine concentrations were associated with an increase in QTcF, but severe prolongation was not observed. More data are required to inform dosing strategies in children.