Infectious disease management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) was surveyed through the Emerging Infections Network. Although there were areas of consensus, we found substantial practice variation in diagnostic evaluation and management of adult patients with SAB. These findings highlight opportunities for further research and guidance to define best practices.

Background

 Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (Truvada) has demonstrated efficacy in placebo-controlled clinical trials involving men who have sex with men, high-risk heterosexuals, serodiscordant couples, and intravenous drug users. To assist in the real-world provision of PrEP, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has released guidance documents for PrEP use.

Methods

 Adult infectious disease physicians were surveyed about their opinions and current practices of PrEP through the Emerging Infections Network (EIN). Geographic information systems analysis was used to map out provider responses across the United States.

Results

 Of 1175 EIN members across the country, 573 (48.8%) responded to the survey. A majority of clinicians supported PrEP but only 9% had actually provided it. Despite CDC guidance, PrEP practices were variable and clinicians reported many barriers to its real-world provision.

Conclusions

 The majority of adult infectious disease physicians across the United States and Canada support PrEP but have vast differences of opinion and practice, despite the existence of CDC guidance documents. The success of real-world PrEP will likely require multifaceted programs addressing barriers to its provision and will be assisted with the development of comprehensive guidelines for real-world PrEP.

Objective

Although a growing number of healthcare facilities are implementing healthcare personnel (HCP) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination requirements, vaccine exemption request management as a part of such programs is not well described.

Design

Cross-sectional survey.

Participants

Infectious disease (ID) physician members of the Emerging Infections Network with infection prevention or hospital epidemiology responsibilities.

Methods

Eligible persons were sent a web-based survey focused on hospital plans and practices around exemption allowances from HCP COVID-19 vaccine requirements.

Results

Of the 695 ID physicians surveyed, 263 (38%) responded. Overall, 160 respondent institutions (92%) allowed medical exemptions, whereas 132 (76%) allowed religious exemptions. In contrast, only 14% (n = 24) allowed deeply held personal belief exemptions. The types of medical exemptions allowed varied considerably across facilities, with allergic reactions to the vaccine or its components accepted by 145 facilities (84%). For selected scenarios commonly used as the basis for religious and deeply held personal belief exemption requests, 144 institutions (83%) would not approve exemptions focused on concerns regarding right of consent or violations of freedom of personal choice, and 140 institutions (81%) would not approve exemptions focused on introducing foreign substances into one's body or the sanctity of the body. Most respondents noted plans for additional infection prevention interventions for HCP who received an exemption for COVID-19 vaccination.

Conclusions

Although many respondent institutions allowed exemptions from HCP COVID-19 vaccination requirements, the types of exemptions allowed and how the exemption programs were structured varied widely.

Background: People living with HIV (PLWH) experience age-associated health conditions earlier than their HIV-uninfected peers and have higher rates of co-occurring conditions that impact aging. Thus, HIV providers frequently confront issues related to HIV and aging. Objective: The objective of this project was to understand provider opinions about the care of older PLWH better. Design: This was accomplished using a quantitative survey. Participants: This study involved 681 physicians treating PLWH in North America. MAIN MEASURES: We collaborated with the Emerging Infections Network (EIN) to administer a ninequestion survey covering practice characteristics, attitudes, and perceived barriers in caring for older PLWH. Key Results: Two hundred and ninety-four (43.2%) responses were collected. Providers estimate that 35% (IQR: 25-50) of their HIV-infected patients were >50 years. The majority (72%) agreed it is difficult to care for older PLWH but had confidence in their ability to do so (85%). Most list a lack of time (55.4%) and insufficient multidisciplinary support (58.5%) as limitations to the effective management of older PLWH. Multi-morbidity was overwhelmingly perceived as the most important barrier to healthy aging (62.2%) followed by tobacco/alcohol use (10%), low income/savings (8.2%), polypharmacy (4.8%) and mental illness (4.4%). Loneliness, frailty, and cognitive difficulties were judged to be less important. In conclusion, HIV providers recognized the complexity of caring for older PLWH, and yet were confident they could care for this population. Conclusion: Multi-morbidity was identified as a major barrier to healthy aging, while syndromes such as frailty and cognitive difficulties were deemed less important despite a growing body of evidence that these geriatric syndromes are common in older PLWH.