Breastfeeding (BF) women are an important population for biomedical HIV prevention strategies, but they are rarely included in trials. The 25-mg dapivirine vaginal ring (VR) reduced women's risk of sexually transmitted HIV infection in two phase 3 trials conducted in Africa. We conducted a phase 1, open-label study (MTN-029/IPM 039) of dapivirine VR use among lactating women in Pittsburgh, PA, and Birmingham, AL, USA. MTN-029/IPM 039 enrolled 16 healthy adult women who had already weaned their infants but were still able to express breast milk. Women were instructed to use the VR continuously for 14 days and provided milk, plasma, and cervicovaginal fluid (CVF) samples for pharmacological analysis. No infants were exposed to the drug, but infant dosage was estimated according to FDA guidance. Adverse events (AEs) were collected at all contacts. The study was completed with 100% participant retention. Median dapivirine concentrations were 676 pg/ml in breast milk, 327 pg/ml in plasma (milk/plasma ratio ∼2.0), and 36.25 ng/mg in CVF. Six participants experienced 10 total AEs, none of which required VR discontinuation. The estimated mean daily infant dosage was 74.3 ng/kg/day. In this first study of dapivirine exposure during lactation, dapivirine VR use was associated with lower concentrations of detectable dapivirine in milk and plasma than in CVF samples and a favorable safety profile. Estimated daily levels of infant dapivirine exposure were also low. Additional studies are needed to evaluate longer periods of dapivirine VR use among BF mother-infant pairs living in regions with higher incidence of sexually transmitted HIV infection. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02808949.).

Objectives

Assessment of safety is an integral part of real-time monitoring in clinical trials. In HIV prevention research, safety of investigational products and trial participation has been expanded to include monitoring for 'social harms', generally defined as negative consequences of trial participation that may manifest in social, psychological, or physical ways. Further research on social harms within HIV prevention research is needed to understand the potential safety risks for women and advance the implementation of prevention methods in real-world contexts.

Methods

Secondary analysis of quantitative data from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of microbicide candidates in sub-Saharan Africa was conducted. Additionally, we assessed data from two prospective cohort studies that included participants who became HIV-positive or pregnant during parent trials.

Results

Social harms reporting was low across the largest and most recent microbicide studies. Social harm incidence per 100 person-years ranged from 1.10 (95% CI 0.78-1.52) to 3.25 (95% CI 2.83-3.74) in the phased trials. Reporting differed by dosing mechanism (e.g. vaginal gel, oral tablet, ring) and study, most likely as a function of measurement differences. Social harms were most frequently associated with male partners, rather than, for example, experiences of stigma in the community.

Conclusion

Measurement and screening for social harms is an important component of conducting ethical research of novel HIV prevention methods. To date, social harm incidence reported in microbicide trials has been relatively low (<4% per 100 person-years), and the majority have been partner-related events. However, any incidence of social harm within the context of HIV prevention is important to capture and understand for the safety of individuals, and for the successful impact of prevention methods in a real-world context.

Objectives

Assessment of safety is an integral part of real-time monitoring in clinical trials. In HIV prevention research, safety of investigational products and trial participation has been expanded to include monitoring for 'social harms', generally defined as negative consequences of trial participation that may manifest in social, psychological, or physical ways. Further research on social harms within HIV prevention research is needed to understand the potential safety risks for women and advance the implementation of prevention methods in real-world contexts.

Methods

Secondary analysis of quantitative data from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of microbicide candidates in sub-Saharan Africa was conducted. Additionally, we assessed data from two prospective cohort studies that included participants who became HIV-positive or pregnant during parent trials.

Results

Social harms reporting was low across the largest and most recent microbicide studies. Social harm incidence per 100 person-years ranged from 1.10 (95% CI 0.78-1.52) to 3.25 (95% CI 2.83-3.74) in the phased trials. Reporting differed by dosing mechanism (e.g. vaginal gel, oral tablet, ring) and study, most likely as a function of measurement differences. Social harms were most frequently associated with male partners, rather than, for example, experiences of stigma in the community.

Conclusion

Measurement and screening for social harms is an important component of conducting ethical research of novel HIV prevention methods. To date, social harm incidence reported in microbicide trials has been relatively low (<4% per 100 person-years), and the majority have been partner-related events. However, any incidence of social harm within the context of HIV prevention is important to capture and understand for the safety of individuals, and for the successful impact of prevention methods in a real-world context.