Background

Oral biotin supplementation is known to interfere with biotin-streptavidin-based immunoassays, including Roche's fifth-generation cardiac troponin T (cTnT) assay, which plays a critical role in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). The utility of dilution, a quick and easy method to detect and remove interferences, has not been published for biotin interference.

Methods

Concentrations of cTnT were measured in pooled serum from clinical samples. Serum samples were supplemented with biotin to known concentrations, then cTnT concentrations were remeasured to assess for biotin interference. Samples were then diluted to assess for effective removal of biotin interference.

Results

At cTnT values near the critical reporting range for our institution (100 ng/L) we observed significant interference in measured values with added biotin concentrations above 50 ng/mL. In specimens without added biotin, autodilution at a 1:10 ratio yielded a mean 157% capture of measured cTnT, precluding the use of autodilution for detecting and mitigating biotin interference. A 1:10 dilution with serum containing 20-30 ng/L cTnT yielded a mean capture of 107%, which was suitable for detecting underlying biotin interference in supplemented samples.

Conclusions

Biotin interference, at supraphysiologic concentrations, may create an artifactual reduction in measured cTnT to levels that could lead to delayed detection of an MI. Dilution with serum of known cTnT concentration of 20-30 ng/L is a fast and effective method to mitigate the analytical consequences of biotin interference.

Objectives

The analytical sensitivity of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) assays has enabled rapid myocardial infarction rule-out algorithms for emergency department (ED) presentations. Few studies have analyzed the real-world impact of hsTnT algorithms on outcomes and operations.

Methods

Comparison of ED length of stay (LOS) and 30-day outcomes (return to ED, inpatient admission, and mortality) for patients presenting with chest pain during 2 separate 208-day periods using a 0/1-hour hsTnT-enabled algorithm or fourth-generation TnT.

Results

Discharge, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality rates were not significantly different with fourth-generation TnT vs hsTnT. Thirty-day return rates were significantly decreased with hsTnT (17.4% vs 14.9%; P < .01). For encounters with TnT measured at least twice and resulting in discharge, median ED LOS decreased by 61 minutes with the use of hsTnT (488 vs 427 minutes; P < .0001). Median time between first and second TnT results decreased by 82 minutes with hsTnT (202 vs 120 minutes; P < .0001), suggesting that the 0/1-hour algorithm was incompletely adopted.

Conclusions

Implementation of the hsTnT algorithm was associated with decreased 30-day return rates and decreased ED LOS for a subset of patients, despite incomplete adoption of the 0/1-hour algorithm.

BACKGROUND:Clinical LC-MS/MS assays traditionally require that samples be run in batches with calibration curves in each batch. This approach is inefficient and presents a barrier to random access analysis. We developed an alternative approach called multipoint internal calibration (MPIC) that eliminated the need for batch-mode analysis. METHODS:The new approach used 4 variants of 13C-labeled methotrexate (0.026-10.3 µM) as an internal calibration curve within each sample. One site carried out a comprehensive validation, which included an evaluation of interferences and matrix effects, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), and 20-day precision. Three sites evaluated assay precision and linearity. MPIC was also compared with traditional LC-MS/MS and an immunoassay. RESULTS:Recovery of spiked analyte was 93%-102%. The LLOQ was validated to be 0.017 µM. Total variability, determined in a 20-day experiment, was 11.5%CV. In a 5-day variability study performed at each site, total imprecision was 3.4 to 16.8%CV. Linearity was validated throughout the calibrator range (r2 > 0.995, slopes = 0.996-1.01). In comparing 40 samples run in each laboratory, the median interlaboratory imprecision was 6.55%CV. MPIC quantification was comparable to both traditional LC-MS/MS and immunoassay (r2 = 0.96-0.98, slopes = 1.04-1.06). Bland-Altman analysis of all comparisons showed biases rarely exceeding 20% when MTX concentrations were >0.4 µM. CONCLUSION:The MPIC method for serum methotrexate quantification was validated in a multisite proof-of-concept study and represents a big step toward random-access LC-MS/MS analysis, which could change the paradigm of mass spectrometry in the clinical laboratory.