- Howard, Michelle;
- Bonham, Aaron J;
- Heyland, Daren K;
- Sudore, Rebecca;
- Fassbender, Konrad;
- Robinson, Carole A;
- McKenzie, Michael;
- Elston, Dawn;
- You, John J;
- Ilan, Roy;
- Brenner, Ingrid;
- Fyles, Gillian;
- Slaven, Marissa;
- Mantle, Carol;
- Swinton, Marilyn;
- Douglas, Maureen
Objectives
To assess the feasibility, acceptability and clinical sensibility of a novel survey, the advance care planning (ACP) Engagement Survey, in various healthcare settings.Setting
A target sample of 50 patients from each of primary care, hospital, cancer care and dialysis care settings.Participants
A convenience sample of patients without cognitive impairment who could speak and read English was recruited. Patients 50 and older were eligible in primary care; patients 80 and older or 55 and older with clinical markers of advanced chronic disease were recruited in hospital; patients aged 19 and older were recruited in cancer and renal dialysis centres.Outcomes
We assessed feasibility, acceptability and clinical sensibility of the ACP Engagement Survey using a 6-point scale. The ACP Engagement Survey measures ACP processes (knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy and readiness) on 5-point Likert scales and actions (yes/no).Results
196 patients (38-96 years old, 50.5% women) participated. Mean (±SD) time to administer was 48.8±19.6 min. Mean acceptability scores ranged from 3.2±1.3 in hospital to 4.7±0.9 in primary care, and mean relevance ranged from 3.5±1.0 in hospital to 4.9±0.9 in dialysis centres (p<0.001 for both). The mean process score was 3.1±0.6 and the mean action score was 11.2±5.6 (of a possible 25).Conclusions
The ACP Engagement Survey demonstrated feasibility and acceptability in outpatient settings but was less feasible and acceptable among hospitalised patients due to length. A shorter version may improve feasibility. Engagement in ACP was low to moderate.