To assess the ability to detect coronary artery narrowings from computer-acquired angiograms, a panel of 4 observers independently identified and measured focal coronary narrowings from digital subtraction angiograms and compared the results to those obtained from standard 35-mm cine film angiograms. Both cine and digital angiograms were obtained sequentially using selective intracoronary artery injection of standard amounts of iodinated contrast media. Digital images were obtained at 8 frames/s with a 512 X 512 X 8-bit pixel matrix. Modifications in the imaging chain for computer acquisition included a slower pulsed radiographic mode, a progressive scan camera, and initial storage of the images on an 80-megabyte digital hard disk. Postprocessing computer algorithms were used to enhance the unsubtracted digital images; these included single-frame, mask-mode subtraction, vessel boundary edge enhancement, and 4-fold pixel magnification. In 19 patient studies, 32 arteries were reduced more than 25% in diameter according to at least 1 of 4 observers on either the digital or cine film angiograms. There was no significant difference in the mean percent diameter narrowing for all the narrowings between the digital angiograms (53 +/- 31%) and the cineangiograms (52 +/- 31%). In addition, a 2-way analysis of variance yielded no significant difference between the amount of variability in the measurements between the cine film and the digital technique. This similar variability persisted when subsets of patients based on the degrees of stenosis were considered (e.g., only narrowings from 50 to 90% diameter reduction).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Attempts to measure left ventricular stroke volume utilizing the Doppler aortic flow method have found varying correlations between invasive thermodilution and non-invasive Doppler methods. Because stroke volume is the product of the Doppler flow velocity integral (that is, the area under the flow velocity curve) and the cross-sectional area of the vessel through which blood flows, both variables are potential sources of error. Previous studies have shown that the Doppler flow velocity integral can be measured with acceptable reproducibility in the ascending aorta. Consequently, in this study an attempt was made to determine empirically the optimal method for measuring aortic diameter and area. The diameter of the ascending aorta was measured utilizing four M-mode and seven two-dimensional echocardiographic conventions. Doppler aortic flow velocity patterns were recorded with a 2.25 MHz M-mode echocardiographic transducer from the suprasternal notch by mapping the ascending aorta until aortic peak flow velocity was recorded. In 19 adult patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for clinical indications, Doppler stroke volume estimates utilizing the various echocardiographic conventions for measuring aortic root diameter and area were compared with simultaneous measurements of stroke volume by the thermodilution technique. The best correlation (r = 0.87) with thermodilution stroke volume was obtained by estimating aortic area from the two-dimensional parasternal long-axis images with the aortic dimension measured distal to the aortic sinuses from the inner to inner wall. The data were related by the equation: Thermodilution stroke volume = (0.73) X (two-dimensional Doppler stroke volume) + 17 cc.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)