Background

Elective repair of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-associated ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (aTAA) is recommended at lower size limits than tricuspid aortic valve (TAV)-associated aTAA. Rupture/dissection can occur when wall stress exceeds wall strength. Previously, a validated computational method was developed for determining aTAA wall stress, but to date this method has not applied to a patient-specific BAV aTAA. The study aim was to develop a patient-specific BAV aTAA computational model to determine regional wall stress, using the required zero-pressure geometry, wall thickness, material properties, and residual stress.

Methods

A BAV aTAA specimen was excised intact during elective repair, and zero-pressure geometry generated using micro-computed tomography. Residual stress was determined from the aTAA opening angle. aTAA material properties determined using biaxial stretch testing were incorporated into an Ogden hyperelastic model. Finite element analyses (FEAs) were performed in LS-DYNA to determine wall stress distribution and magnitudes at systemic pressure.

Results

The left aTAA region had the highest stiffness, followed by the right, and then anterior/posterior walls, suggesting regional variability in mechanical properties. During systole, the mean principal wall stresses were 108.8 kPa (circumferential) and 59.9 kPa (longitudinal), while peak wall stresses were 789.4 kPa (circumferential) and 618.8 kPa (longitudinal). Elevated wall stress pockets were seen in anatomic left aTAA regions.

Conclusions

To the present authors' knowledge, this was the first patient-specific BAV aTAA model based on surgical specimens to be developed. Surgical specimens serve as the 'gold standard' for determining wall stress to validate models based on in-vivo imaging data alone. Regions of maximal wall stress may indicate sites most prone to rupture, and are crucial for evaluating rupture risk based on the wall stress/strength relationship.

Background

Myocardial function deteriorates during ventricular remodeling in patients with congestive heart failure (HF). Ventricular restraint therapy using a cardiac support device (CSD) is designed to reduce the amount of stress inside the dilated ventricles, which in turn halts remodeling. However, as an open mesh surrounding the heart, it is unknown what the mechanical properties of the CSD are in different fiber orientations.

Methods

Composite specimens of CorCap (Acorn Cardiovascular, Inc, St. Paul, MN) CSD fabric and silicone were constructed in different fiber orientations and tested on a custom-built biaxial stretcher. Silicone controls were made and stretched to detect the parameters of the matrix. CSD coefficients were calculated using the composite and silicone matrix stress-strain data. Stiffness in different fiber orientations was determined.

Results

Silicone specimens exerted a linear behavior, with stiffness of 2.57 MPa. For the composites with 1 fiber set aligned with respect to the stretch axes, stiffness in the direction of the aligned fiber set was higher than that in the cross-fiber direction (14.39 MPa versus 5.66 MPa), indicating greater compliance in the cross-fiber direction. When the orientation of the fiber sets in the composite were matched to the expected clinical orientation of the implanted CorCap, the stiffness in the circumferential axis (with respect to the heart) was greater than in the longitudinal axis (10.55 MPa versus 9.70 MPa).

Conclusions

The mechanical properties of the CorCap demonstrate directionality with greater stiffness circumferentially than longitudinally. Implantation of the CorCap clinically should take into account the directionality of the biomechanics to optimize ventricular restraint.

Background and aim of the study

Rupture/dissection of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (aTAA) is a cardiovascular emergency. Elective surgical repair is primarily based on maximum diameter, but complications have occurred under the size limits for surgical intervention. aTAA wall stress may be a better predictor of patient-specific rupture risk, but cannot be directly measured in vivo. The study aim was to develop an aTAA computational model associated with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) to determine patient-specific wall stresses.

Methods

A TAV-associated aTAA was excised intact during surgery. Zero-pressure geometry was generated from microcomputed tomography, and an opening angle was used to calculate residual stress. Material properties determined from stress-strain data were incorporated into an Ogden hyperelastic model. Wall stress distribution and magnitudes at systemic pressure were determined using finite element analyses (FEA) in LS-DYNA.

Results

Regional material property differences were noted: the left aTAA region had a higher stiffness compared to the right, and anterior/posterior walls. During systole, the mean principal wall stresses were 172.0 kPa (circumferential) and 71.9 kPa (longitudinal), while peak wall stresses were 545.1 kPa (circumferential) and 430.1 kPa (longitudinal). Elevated wall stress pockets were seen in anatomic left and right aTAA regions.

Conclusion

A validated computational approach was demonstrated to determine aTAA wall stresses in a patient-specific fashion, taking into account the required zero-stress geometry, wall thickness, material properties and residual stress. Regions of maximal wall stress may indicate the sites most prone to rupture. The creation of a patient-specific aTAA model based on a surgical specimen is necessary to serve as the 'gold standard' for comparing models based on in-vivo data alone. Validated data using the surgical specimen are essential for establishing wall stress and rupture-risk relationships.