Context

Little research has examined the relationship between women's preferences of contraceptive features and their interest in IUD use. Given high levels of contraceptive discontinuation and dissatisfaction, a better understanding of contraceptive preferences may support women in finding their optimal method and meeting their family planning goals.

Methods

Data from 382 heterosexual women aged 18-29 were collected via a 2012 Internet survey. Chi-square tests and multivariate, multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine relationships between contraceptive features preferred by women and their interest in IUD use.

Results

Forty-eight percent of women reported being unsure whether they would ever use an IUD; 20% were interested in using one, and 32% were not. In multivariate analyses, characteristics of a contraceptive method found positively associated with IUD interest were the method's not interfering with sexual pleasure (relative risk ratio, 3.4), being 99% effective without user action (2.5) and being effective for up to five years without any user action (3.8). Women who preferred a method that they could see or that would allow them to resume fertility immediately after discontinuation were less likely than those who did not to be interested in using rather than not using an IUD (0.4-0.5).

Conclusions

The findings of this exploratory analysis indicate that women value a multitude of contraceptive features, which may have implications for their interest in using an IUD. Future research should consider the ways that women's contraceptive preferences can be incorporated into contraceptive counseling.

Increasing use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) is seen as a promising strategy to prevent unintended pregnancies, particularly among young women. In this study, we examined correlates of young women's interest in using an IUD, including sources of information about, knowledge of, and attitudes toward IUDs.We conducted a national Web survey of young adults (ages 18-29) in 2012. Using a subset of data from 382 sexually experienced young women who had never used an IUD, we employed multinominal logit regression models to examine differences in IUD interest.Twenty percent of women in the sample were interested in using an IUD in the future, 32% were not, and 48% were unsure. Women who thought IUDs were unattractive owing to the devices being inside their bodies, the need for provider insertion and removal, or the potential for pain during insertion were less likely to be interested in ever using an IUD. Those who found IUDs attractive owing to the ease of use, the ability to have sex without interruption or a barrier method, the option of a nonhormonal method, the potential length of use, the internal nature of the method, or the high level of effectiveness were more likely to be interested.These data suggest that young women's attitudes toward IUDs are strongly linked to their interest-or lack thereof-in using an IUD. Health care providers attuned to women's contraceptive preferences are well-poised to help their patients match with methods that best accommodate these preferences.

The U.S. Supreme Court decisions in U.S. v. Windsor (570 U.S. 307) and Hollingsworth v. Perry (570 U.S. 399) created a focal point for public discussion of marriage equality for same-sex couples. This article reports the results of an exploratory study of the reactions of individuals currently or previously in same-sex couple relationships and a heterosexual sibling who is currently or previously married (N = 371) to the Supreme Court decisions. Thematic content analysis was used to explore participants’ responses to an open-ended question on a survey. Reactions of individuals from same-sex couples revealed the following themes: (1) longitudinal perspectives on the advancement of rights for same-sex couples; (2) emotional responses celebrating the decisions or expressing relief; (3) affirmation of their relationship or rights; (4) practical consequences of the extension of rights; and (5) minority stress related to anticipation of future prejudice or discrimination. Themes in the heterosexual siblings’ responses were (1) ally support; (2) flat support without emotion or elaboration; (3) indifference to or ignorance about the decisions; and (4) disapproval of the decisions. These themes are compared and discussed in light of prior research on reactions to marriage restriction debates and marriage (in)equality and family relationships.