- Labadie, Jessica G;
- Ibrahim, Sarah A;
- Worley, Brandon;
- Kang, Bianca Y;
- Rakita, Uros;
- Rigali, Sarah;
- Arndt, Kenneth A;
- Bernstein, Eric;
- Brauer, Jeremy A;
- Chandra, Sunandana;
- Didwania, Aashish;
- DiGiorgio, Catherine;
- Donelan, Mattias;
- Dover, Jeffrey S;
- Galadari, Hassan;
- Geronemus, Roy G;
- Goldman, Mitchel P;
- Haedersdal, Merete;
- Hruza, George;
- Ibrahimi, Omar A;
- Kauvar, Arielle;
- Kelly, Kristen M;
- Krakowski, Andrew C;
- Miest, Rachel;
- Orringer, Jeffrey S;
- Ozog, David M;
- Ross, E Victor;
- Shumaker, Peter R;
- Sobanko, Joseph F;
- Suozzi, Kathleen;
- Taylor, Mark B;
- Teng, Joyce MC;
- Uebelhoer, Nathan S;
- Waibel, Jill;
- Wanner, Molly;
- Ratchev, Ina;
- Christensen, Rachel E;
- Poon, Emily;
- Miller, Corinne H;
- Alam, Murad
Importance
Laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) is used for various medical and cosmetic applications. However, there is insufficient evidence-based guidance to assist clinicians performing LADD.Objective
To develop recommendations for the safe and effective use of LADD.Evidence review
A systematic literature review of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE was conducted in December 2019 to identify publications reporting research on LADD. A multidisciplinary panel was convened to draft recommendations informed by the systematic review; they were refined through 2 rounds of Delphi survey, 2 consensus meetings, and iterative review by all panelists until unanimous consensus was achieved.Findings
Of the 48 published studies of ablative fractional LADD that met inclusion criteria, 4 were cosmetic studies; 21, oncologic; and 23, medical (not cosmetic/oncologic), and 6 publications of nonablative fractional LADD were included at the request of the expert panel, producing a total of 54 studies. Thirty-four studies (63.0%) were deemed to have low risk of bias, 17 studies (31.5%) had moderate risk, and 3 (5.5%) had serious risk. The key findings that informed the guidelines developed by the expert panel were as follows: LADD is safe in adults and adolescents (≥12 years) with all Fitzpatrick skin types and in patients with immunosuppression; it is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ, actinic cheilitis, hypertrophic scars, and keloids; it is useful for epidermal and dermal analgesia; drug delivery may be increased through the application of heat, pressure, or occlusion, or by using an aqueous drug solution; laser settings should be selected to ensure that channel diameter is greater than the delivered molecule; antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended, except with impaired wound healing; antiviral prophylaxis is recommended when treating the face and genitalia; and antifungal prophylaxis is not recommended. The guideline's 15 recommendations address 5 areas of LADD use: (I) indications and contraindications; (II) parameters to report; (III) optimization of drug delivery; (IV) safety considerations; and (V) prophylaxis for bacterial, viral, and fungal infections.Conclusions and relevance
This systematic review and Delphi consensus approach culminated in an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for safe and effective use of LADD in a variety of applications. Future research will further improve our understanding of this novel treatment technique.