Adults (Keysar et al, 2000) and children (Epley et al, 2004) sometimes commit egocentric errors when interpreting otherscommunication, if the self-perspective differs from the speakers perspective. Training imitation inhibition reduces egocen-tric error in adults (Santiesteban et al., 2011), presumably because it makes salient the distinction between self and other.As managing the self-other perspective difference may undergo developmental changes during preschool years (South-gate, in press), we tested whether a social imitation inhibition training may reduce egocentric mistakes in 3-6-year-oldchildren. Results with n=47 (of n=50 preregistered) children show that the imitation inhibition group selected the object towhich the speaker referred more often than children in a control condition (F(1,35)=5.346, p=.026). However, there wasan interaction with age (F(2,35)=3.805, p=.032): only 4-year-olds, but neither 3- nor 6-year-olds, were more accurate inthe inhibition group. Childrens reaction times and hesitation will be analyzed on the final sample.

The processing of Navon figures (Navon, 1977), i.e., hierarchical letter stimuli, has been studied in experimental settings for many years. In particular, they have been studied in the context of visual hemifield studies and yielded an interaction between hemifield and whether a target is at the local or global level, with a right hemisphere advantage for the global level, and a left hemisphere advantage for the targets at the local level (Sergent, 1982). This is a ventral stream process, however, and we were interested in whether there might be a similar interaction for hierarchical motion stimuli, presumably a dorsal stream process. Hence we developed a series of dynamic geometric Navon figures in order to study global/local rotation processing. These figures consist of a global figure (a triangle or a square) made up of local figures (also triangles or squares). Both global and local figures can rotate in either clockwise or counterclockwise directions independently. We found that there is no right or left visual field perceptual advantage for either the global or local levels of these figures. However, curiously enough, we found that there is a significant processing advantage for clockwise motion compared to counterclockwise motion. We also found a highly significant interaction between the detection of a particular rotational motion and the presence or absence of that motion in the figure being examined. Finally, our data strongly support the Global Precedence Hypothesis which says that people generally tend to focus on the global properties of an object before local properties and that processing proceeds in a global-to-local direction.