- Leiman, David;
- Kamal, Afrin;
- Otaki, Fouad;
- Bredenoord, Albert;
- Dellon, Evan;
- Falk, Gary;
- Fernandez-Becker, Nielsen;
- Gonsalves, Nirmala;
- Hirano, Ikuo;
- Katzka, David;
- Peterson, Kathryn;
- Kathpalia, Priya;
- Yadlapati, Rena
INTRODUCTION: Despite best practice recommendations for managing eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), variation in care exists. METHODS: We used established methodology for quality indicator development to identify metrics to define quality for the treatment of EoE. RESULTS: Among 29 proposed quality indicator statements, 9 (31%) were adopted as highly valid across all categories. Two (22%) of these statements were identified as having existing or suspected quality gaps. DISCUSSION: We identified highly valid EoE quality indicators for adult gastroenterologists, which can be used for quality improvement with resulting benefits for patient outcomes.