Background

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) sequence diversity and the presence of archived epitope muta-tions in antibody binding sites are a major obstacle for the clinical application of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) against HIV-1. Specifically, it is unclear to what degree the viral reservoir is compartmentalized and if virus susceptibility to antibody neutralization differs across tissues.

Methods

The Last Gift cohort enrolled 7 people with HIV diagnosed with a terminal illness and collected antemortem blood and postmortem tissues across 33 anatomical compartments for near full-length env HIV genome sequencing. Using these data, we applied a Bayesian machine-learning model (Markov chain Monte Carlo-support vector machine) that uses HIV-1 envelope sequences and approximated glycan-occupancy information to quantitatively predict the half-maximal inhib-itory concentrations (IC50) of bNAbs, allowing us to map neutralization resistance pattern across tissue reservoirs.

Results

Predicted mean susceptibilities across tissues within participants were relatively homogenous, and the susceptibility pattern observed in blood often matched what was predicted for tissues. However, selected tissues, such as the brain, showed ev-idence of compartmentalized viral populations with distinct neutralization susceptibilities in some participants. Additionally, we found substantial heterogeneity in the range of neutralization susceptibilities across tissues within and between indi-viduals, and between bNAbs within individuals (standard deviation of log2(IC50) >3.4).

Conclusions

Blood-based screening methods to determine viral susceptibility to bNAbs might underestimate the presence of resistant viral variants in tissues. The extent to which these resistant viruses are clinically relevant, that is, lead to bNAb therapeutic failure, needs to be further explored.

While antiretroviral therapy (ART) has effectively revolutionized HIV care, the virus is never fully eliminated. Instead, immune dysfunction, driven by persistent non-specific immune activation, ensues and progressively leads to premature immunologic aging. Current biomarkers monitoring immunologic changes encompass generic inflammatory biomarkers, that may also change with other infections or disease states, precluding the antigen-specific monitoring of HIV-infection associated changes in disease. Given our growing appreciation of the significant changes in qualitative and quantitative properties of disease-specific antibodies in HIV infection, we used a systems approach to explore humoral profiles associated with HIV control. We found that HIV-specific antibody profiles diverge by spontaneous control of HIV, treatment status, viral load and reservoir size. Specifically, HIV-specific antibody profiles representative of changes in viral load were largely quantitative, reflected by differential HIV-specific antibody levels and Fc-receptor binding. Conversely, HIV-specific antibody features that tracked with reservoir size exhibited a combination of quantitative and qualitative changes marked by more distinct subclass selection profiles and unique HIV-specific Fc-glycans. Our analyses suggest that HIV-specific antibody Fc-profiles provide antigen-specific resolution on both cell free and cell-associated viral loads, pointing to potentially novel biomarkers to monitor reservoir activity.

Analytical antiretroviral treatment interruption (ATI) is an important feature of HIV research, seeking to achieve sustained viral suppression in the absence of antiretroviral therapy (ART) when the goal is to measure effects of novel therapeutic interventions on time to viral load rebound or altered viral setpoint. Trials with ATIs also intend to determine host, virological, and immunological markers that are predictive of sustained viral control off ART. Although ATI is increasingly incorporated into proof-of-concept trials, no consensus has been reached on strategies to maximise its utility and minimise its risks. In addition, differences in ATI trial designs hinder the ability to compare efficacy and safety of interventions across trials. Therefore, we held a meeting of stakeholders from many interest groups, including scientists, clinicians, ethicists, social scientists, regulators, people living with HIV, and advocacy groups, to discuss the main challenges concerning ATI studies and to formulate recommendations with an emphasis on strategies for risk mitigation and monitoring, ART resumption criteria, and ethical considerations. In this Review, we present the major points of discussion and consensus views achieved with the goal of informing the conduct of ATIs to maximise the knowledge gained and minimise the risk to participants in clinical HIV research.