PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes and risk for rerupture after surgical treatment of proximal hamstring tendon ruptures using all-suture anchors and a unique postoperative bracing strategy. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was conducted of patients undergoing proximal hamstring repair or reconstruction from 2020 to 2022 at a tertiary, academic institution. Patients were included if they reached minimum 1-year follow-up and completed postoperative patient-reported outcomes. The surgical protocol for proximal hamstring repairs included all-suture anchors placed either in an open or endoscopic fashion in the ischial tuberosity. After surgery, all patients underwent an accelerated rehabilitation protocol, including 6 weeks touchdown weight-bearing in a hinged knee brace locked in extension for ambulation, allowing passive knee flexion to 90° while seated. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included (mean age 50.4 ± 9.5 years, body mass index 24.4 ± 3.5, 66.7% female). Lower Extremity Functional Scale score achieved postoperatively was 74.2 ± 7.5 (out of 80). Patients had minimal pain (mean visual analog scale pain score of 0.9 ± 1.2). 61.9% of patients were able to return to the same level of activity after based on Tegner score by 1 year. Postoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation activity of daily living was 94.3 ± 8.3, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Sports was 82.3 ± 19.0. Mean Short Form Survey (SF-12) postoperative scores were 51.6 ± 6.8 for SF-12 Physical Component Score and 53.9 ± 9.7 for Mental Component Score. 95.2% (20 of 21) patients were satisfied with their outcome. There were no reruptures, infections, or reoperations. One patient of 21 (4.8%) incurred a postoperative deep venous thrombosis, which was treated with therapeutic anticoagulation for 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: All-suture anchors for proximal hamstring repair with a unique accelerated postoperative rehabilitation and bracing protocol result in good outcomes and patient satisfaction with minimal risk of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series, therapeutic.

PURPOSE: Type of and time to definitive treatment for distal radius fractures can influence the outcomes. The impact of social determinants of health (eg, insurance type) on distal radius fracture care remains unknown despite having health equity implications. Thus, we evaluate the association between insurance type and rate of surgery, the time to surgery, and the complication rate for distal radius fractures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the PearlDiver Database. We identified adults with closed distal radius fractures. Patients were divided into subgroups by age (18-64 years, 65+ years) and further stratified on the basis of the insurance type (Medicare Advantage, Medicaid-managed care, and commercial). The primary outcome was the rate of surgical fixation. Secondary outcomes included the time to surgery and 12-month complication rates. Logistic regression modeling was used to calculate the odds ratios for each outcome, adjusting for age, sex, geographic region, and comorbidities. RESULTS: In patients aged ≥65 years, a lower proportion of Medicaid patients underwent surgery within 21 days of diagnosis compared with Medicare or commercially insured patients (12.1% vs 15.9% or 17.5%, respectively). Complication rates did not differ between Medicaid and other insurance types. In patients aged <65 years, fewer Medicaid patients underwent surgery compared with commercially insured patients (16.2% vs 21.1%). However, in this younger group, Medicaid patients had higher adjusted odds of malunion/nonunion (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.39 [95% CI, 1.31-1.47]) and subsequent repair (aOR = 1.38 [95% CI, 1.25-1.53]). DISCUSSION: Although older Medicaid patients experienced lower surgical rates, this may not lead to differential clinical outcomes. However, Medicaid patients aged <65 years experienced lower surgical rates that correlated with the increased rates of malunion or nonunion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In younger patients with a closed distal radius fracture and Medicaid insurance, system and patient-directed efforts should be considered to address delayed time to surgery and a higher odds for malunion/nonunion.

Distal radius fractures are one of the most common upper extremity fractures across all age groups. Although the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery (AAOS) Clinical Practice Guidelines have defined recommendations for the treatment of distal radius fractures, the optimal time to surgery was not included. There remains relatively little guidance or consensus regarding the optimal timing of surgical intervention for distal radius fractures and the impact of time to surgery on outcomes. As such, the purpose of this investigation is to systematically review clinical and radiographic outcomes associated with time to surgical management of distal radius fractures.