- Blankenship, Robert E;
- Tiede, David M;
- Barber, James;
- Brudvig, Gary W;
- Fleming, Graham;
- Ghirardi, Maria;
- Gunner, MR;
- Junge, Wolfgang;
- Kramer, David M;
- Melis, Anastasios;
- Moore, Thomas A;
- Moser, Christopher C;
- Nocera, Daniel G;
- Nozik, Arthur J;
- Ort, Donald R;
- Parson, William W;
- Prince, Roger C;
- Sayre, Richard T
Comparing photosynthetic and photovoltaic efficiencies is not a simple issue. Although both processes harvest the energy in sunlight, they operate in distinctly different ways and produce different types of products: biomass or chemical fuels in the case of natural photosynthesis and nonstored electrical current in the case of photovoltaics. In order to find common ground for evaluating energy-conversion efficiency, we compare natural photosynthesis with present technologies for photovoltaic-driven electrolysis of water to produce hydrogen. Photovoltaic-driven electrolysis is the more efficient process when measured on an annual basis, yet short-term yields for photosynthetic conversion under optimal conditions come within a factor of 2 or 3 of the photovoltaic benchmark. We consider opportunities in which the frontiers of synthetic biology might be used to enhance natural photosynthesis for improved solar energy conversion efficiency.