BACKGROUND: The timing of events in the management of osteosarcoma may be critical for patient survivorship; however, the prognostic value of factors such as onset of symptoms or initiation of therapy in these patients has not been studied. This study sought to review the literature reporting treatment of osteosarcoma to determine the utility of event timing as a prognostic indicator. Due to significant heterogeneity in the literature, this study was conducted as a scoping review to assess the current state of the literature, identify strengths and weaknesses in current reporting practices, and to propose avenues for future improvement. MAIN BODY: This review screened 312 peer-reviewed studies of osteosarcoma in any anatomic location published in an English journal for reporting of an event timing metric of any kind in a population of 6 or more. Thirty-seven studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were assessed for level of evidence, quality, and event timing metric. Reviewers also collated: publication year, population size, population age, tumor site, tumor type, surgical treatment, and adjuvant medical treatment. Extracted event timing data were further characterized using nine standardized categories to enable systematic analysis. The reporting of event timing in the treatment of osteosarcoma was incomplete and heterogenous. Only 37 of 312 (11.9%) screened studies reported event timing in any capacity. The period between patient-reported symptom initiation and definitive diagnosis was the most reported (17/37, 45.9%). Symptom duration was the second most reported period (10/37, 27.0%). Event timing was typically reported incidentally and was never rigorously incorporated into data analysis or discussion. No studies considered the impact of event timing on a primary outcome. The six largest studies were assessed in detail to identify pearls for future researchers. Notable shortcomings included the inadequate reporting of the definition of an event timing period and the pooling of patients into poorly defined timing groups. CONCLUSIONS: Inconsistent reporting of event timing in osteosarcoma treatment prevents the development of clinically useful conclusions despite evidence to suggest event timing is a useful prognostic indicator. Consensus guidelines are necessary to improve uniformity and utility in the reporting of event timing.

Regional gene therapy using a lentiviral vector containing the BMP-2 complementary DNA (cDNA) has been shown to heal critical-sized bone defects in rodent models. An appropriate "cellular dose" needs to be defined for eventual translation into human trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate bone defect healing potential and quality using three different doses of transduced human bone marrow cells (HBMCs). HBMCs were transduced with a lentiviral vector containing either BMP-2 or green fluorescent protein (GFP). All cells were loaded onto compression-resistant matrices and implanted in the bone defect of athymic rats. Treatment groups included femoral defects that were treated with a low-dose (1 × 10⁶ cells), standard-dose (5 × 10⁶ cells), and high-dose (1.5 × 10⁷ cells) HBMCs transduced with lentiviral vector containing BMP-2 cDNA. The three control groups were bone defects treated with HBMCs that were either nontransduced or transduced with vector containing GFP. All animals were sacrificed at 12 weeks. The bone formed in each defect was evaluated with plain radiographs, microcomputed tomography (microCT), histomorphometric analysis, and biomechanical testing. Bone defects treated with higher doses of BMP-2-producing cells were more likely to have healed (6/14 of the low-dose group; 12/14 of the standard-dose group; 14/14 of the high-dose group; χ²(2) = 15.501, p < 0.001). None of the bone defects in the control groups had healed. Bone defects treated with high dose and standard dose of BMP-2-producing cells consistently outperformed those treated with a low dose in terms of bone formation, as assessed by microCT and histomorphometry, and biomechanical parameters. However, statistical significance was only seen between defects treated with high dose and low dose. Larger doses of BMP-2-producing cells were associated with a higher likelihood of forming heterotopic ossification. Femurs treated with a standard- and high-dose BMP-2-producing cells demonstrated similar healing and biomechanical properties. Increased doses of BMP-2 delivered through higher cell doses have the potential to heal large bone defects. Adapting regional gene therapy for use in humans will require a balance between promoting bone repair and limiting heterotopic ossification. Impact statement Critical bone loss may result from complex traumatic bone injury (i.e., open fracture or blast injury), revision total joint arthroplasty, and spine pseudoarthrosis. This is a challenging clinical problem to treat and regional gene therapy is an innovative means of addressing it. This study provides information regarding the quantity of cells or "cell dose" of transduced cells needed to treat a critical-sized bone defect in a rat model. This information may be extrapolated for use in humans in future trials.