Background

Community acquired respiratory virus (CARV) infections in lung transplant recipients (LTR) have been associated with adverse outcomes, including acute rejection (AR) and decline in allograft function, in some but not in all studies.

Methods

Spirometry and transbronchial biopsy results of LTR diagnosed with CARV infection over a two-yr period were extracted from clinical records. Primary outcomes, studied at 1-2.5 months postinfection, were as follows: (i) incidence of biopsy-proven AR (grade >A0) and (ii) allograft function, defined by forced expiratory volume in one s (FEV(1)). A reference group of biopsies (n = 526) collected during the study period established the baseline incidence of AR. Rhinovirus (RV) and non-rhinovirus (non-RV) infections were analyzed as subgroups.

Results

Eighty-seven cases of CARV infection were identified in 59 subjects. Incidences of AR were similar in the post-CARV and reference groups and did not differ significantly after RV vs. non-RV infection. Allograft function declined significantly after non-RV infection, but not after RV infection.

Conclusions

In LTR, CARV infections other than RV are associated with allograft dysfunction at 1-2.5 months after infection. However, CARVs do not appear associated with AR at this time point. The impact of specific CARVs on lung allografts, including the development of chronic allograft rejection, merits further study.

Background

Lung transplant (LT) aims to extend survival and improve patient-centred outcomes (PCOs) by reducing disability and improving health-related quality of life (HRQL). Few PCO instruments have been validated in LT populations. We aimed to develop and validate a shortened version of the valued life activities (VLA) disability scale specific to LT.

Methods

We used data from 140 subjects participating in an ongoing cohort study of LT. Subjects completed a survey battery, including VLA items, and physical assessments before LT. To develop a shortened LT-specific VLA (LT-VLA), we iteratively deleted items from a longer 32-item VLA battery, retaining the instrument's conceptual framework, scoring and performance characteristics. We evaluated LT-VLA validity by testing correlations with a HRQL measure (Short Form-12 Physical Function (SF-12 PF) subscale), forced vital capacity % (FVC%) predicted and 6 minute walk distance (6MWD). Responsiveness was evaluated in 84 subjects who completed assessments before and after LT.

Results

The 15-item LT-VLA scoring closely matched the longer VLA (correlations ≥0.96) and had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.92). The LT-VLA required only 3 min or less to administer. The LT-VLA, measured as mean difficulty in performing each of the 15 activities queried, correlated with FVC% predicted (r=-0.30), 6MWD (r=-0.38) and SF-12 PF (r=-0.47) (all p<0.01). The LT-VLA mean difficulty was responsive to change from before to after LT (63% improvement; effect size=1.60).

Conclusions

The LT-VLA is a short, easy to administer, valid and responsive disease-specific PCO instrument that may be useful in clinical and research applications for lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Lung disease is the leading cause of death in systemic sclerosis (SSc). The diagnosis of SSc-related lung disease (SSc-LD) is often a contraindication to lung transplantation (LT) due to concerns that extrapulmonary involvement will yield worse outcomes. We sought to evaluate posttransplantation outcomes in persons with SSc-LD with esophageal involvement compared with persons with nonconnective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (nCTD-ILD). METHODS: From 1998 to 2012, persons undergoing LT for SSc-LD were age and gender matched in a 2:1 fashion to controls undergoing LT for nCTD-ILD. Esophageal function was assessed by pH testing and manometry. We defined esophageal dysfunction as the presence of a DeMeester score >14 or dysmotility more severe than mild nonspecific disorder. The primary outcome was posttransplantation survival. Secondary outcomes included freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (fBOS) and rates of acute rejection. Survival and fBOS were estimated with Kaplan-Meier methods. Acute rejection was compared with Students t test. RESULTS: Survival was similar in 23 persons with SSc-LD and 46 controls who underwent LT (P = 0.47). For the SSc-LD group, 1- and 5-year survival was 83% and 76% compared with 91% and 64% in the nCTD-ILD group, respectively. There were no differences in fBOS (P = 0.83). Rates of acute rejection were less in SSc-ILD (P = 0.05). Esophageal dysfunction was not associated with worse outcomes (P>0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Persons with SSc-LD appear to have similar survival and fBOS as persons transplanted for nCTD-ILD. The risk of acute rejection after transplantation may be reduced in persons with SSc-LD. Esophageal involvement does not appear to impact outcomes.

Rationale: The lung allocation score (LAS) was revised in 2015 to improve waiting list mortality and rate of transplant for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Objectives: We sought to determine if the 2015 revision achieved its intended goals. Methods: Using the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file, we assessed the impact of the 2015 LAS revision by comparing the pre- and postrevision eras. Registrants were divided into the LAS diagnostic categories: group A-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; group B-pulmonary arterial hypertension; group C-cystic fibrosis; and group D-interstitial lung disease. Competing risk regressions were used to assess the two mutually exclusive competing risks of waiting list death and transplant. Cumulative incidence plots were created to visually inspect risks. Measurements and Main Results: The LAS at organ matching increased by 14.2 points for registrants with PAH after the 2015 LAS revision, the greatest increase among diagnostic categories (other LAS categories: Δ, -0.9 to +2.8 points). Before the revision, registrants with PAH had the highest risk of death and lowest likelihood of transplant. After the 2015 revision, registrants with PAH still had the highest risk of death, now similar to those with interstitial lung disease, and the lowest rate of transplant, now similar to those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Conclusions: Although the 2015 LAS revision improved access to transplant and reduced the risk of waitlist death for patients with PAH, it did not go far enough. Significant differences in waitlist mortality and likelihood of transplant persist.

Background

Lung transplant recipients undergo bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to detect antecedents of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), but routine assessment of BAL cytology is controversial. We hypothesized that inflammation on BAL cytology would predict CLAD-free survival.

Methods

In a single-center retrospective cohort, associations between cytology results and clinical characteristics were compared using generalized-estimating equation-adjusted regression. The association between BAL inflammation and CLAD or death risk was assessed using time-dependent Cox models.

Results

In 3365 cytology reports from 451 subjects, inflammation was the most common finding (6.2%, 210 cases), followed by fungal forms (5.3%, 178 cases, including 24 cases of suspected Aspergillus). Inflammation on BAL cytology was more common in procedures for symptoms (8.5%) versus surveillance (3.2%, p < .001). Inflammation on cytology was associated with automated neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, acute cellular rejection, infection, and portended a 2.2-fold hazard ratio (CI 1.2-4.0, p = .007) for CLAD or death. However, inflammation by cytology did not inform CLAD-free survival risk beyond automated BAL cell counts (p = .57).

Conclusions

Inflammation on BAL cytology is clinically significant, suggesting acute rejection or infection and increased risk of CLAD or death. However, other indicators of allograft inflammation can substitute for much of the information provided by BAL cytology.

Background

Lung disease is the leading cause of death in systemic sclerosis (SSc). The diagnosis of SSc-related lung disease (SSc-LD) is often a contraindication to lung transplantation (LT) due to concerns that extrapulmonary involvement will yield worse outcomes. We sought to evaluate posttransplantation outcomes in persons with SSc-LD with esophageal involvement compared with persons with nonconnective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (nCTD-ILD).

Methods

From 1998 to 2012, persons undergoing LT for SSc-LD were age and gender matched in a 2:1 fashion to controls undergoing LT for nCTD-ILD. Esophageal function was assessed by pH testing and manometry. We defined esophageal dysfunction as the presence of a DeMeester score >14 or dysmotility more severe than "mild nonspecific disorder". The primary outcome was posttransplantation survival. Secondary outcomes included freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (fBOS) and rates of acute rejection. Survival and fBOS were estimated with Kaplan-Meier methods. Acute rejection was compared with Student's t test.

Results

Survival was similar in 23 persons with SSc-LD and 46 controls who underwent LT (P = 0.47). For the SSc-LD group, 1- and 5-year survival was 83% and 76% compared with 91% and 64% in the nCTD-ILD group, respectively. There were no differences in fBOS (P = 0.83). Rates of acute rejection were less in SSc-ILD (P = 0.05). Esophageal dysfunction was not associated with worse outcomes (P>0.55).

Conclusions

Persons with SSc-LD appear to have similar survival and fBOS as persons transplanted for nCTD-ILD. The risk of acute rejection after transplantation may be reduced in persons with SSc-LD. Esophageal involvement does not appear to impact outcomes.

Acute and chronic rejections limit the long-term survival after lung transplant. Pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is an incompletely understood driver of long-term outcomes characterized by donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), innate immune infiltration, and evidence of complement activation. Natural killer (NK) cells may recognize DSAs via the CD16 receptor, but this complement-independent mechanism of injury has not been explored in pulmonary AMR. CD16⁺ NK cells were quantified in 508 prospectively collected bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from 195 lung transplant recipients. Associations between CD16⁺ NK cells and human leukocyte antigen mismatches, DSAs, and AMR grade were assessed by linear models adjusted for participant characteristics and repeat measures. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess CD16⁺ NK cell association with chronic lung allograft dysfunction and survival. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid CD16⁺ NK cell frequency was associated with increasing human leukocyte antigens mismatches and increased AMR grade. Although NK frequencies were similar between DSA+ and DSA- recipients, CD16⁺ NK cell frequencies were greater in recipients with AMR and those with concomitant allograft dysfunction. CD16⁺ NK cells were associated with long-term graft dysfunction after AMR and decreased chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival. These data support the role of CD16⁺ NK cells in pulmonary AMR.

BACKGROUND: Acute lung allograft dysfunction (ALAD) is an imprecise syndrome denoting concern for the onset of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Mechanistic biomarkers are needed that stratify risk of ALAD progression to CLAD. We hypothesized that single cell investigation of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells at the time of ALAD would identify immune cells linked to progressive graft dysfunction. METHODS: We prospectively collected BAL from consenting lung transplant recipients for single cell RNA sequencing. ALAD was defined by a ≥10% decrease in FEV1 not caused by infection or acute rejection and samples were matched to BAL from recipients with stable lung function. We examined cell compositional and transcriptional differences across control, ALAD with decline, and ALAD with recovery groups. We also assessed cell-cell communication. RESULTS: BAL was assessed for 17 ALAD cases with subsequent decline (ALAD declined), 13 ALAD cases that resolved (ALAD recovered), and 15 cases with stable lung function. We observed broad differences in frequencies of the 26 unique cell populations across groups (p = 0.02). A CD8 T cell (p = 0.04) and a macrophage cluster (p = 0.01) best identified ALAD declined from the ALAD recovered and stable groups. This macrophage cluster was distinguished by an anti-inflammatory signature and the CD8 T cell cluster resembled a Tissue Resident Memory subset. Anti-inflammatory macrophages signaled to activated CD8 T cells via class I HLA, fibronectin, and galectin pathways (p < 0.05 for each). Recipients with discordance between these cells had a nearly 5-fold increased risk of severe graft dysfunction or death (HR 4.6, 95% CI 1.1-19.2, adjusted p = 0.03). We validated these key findings in 2 public lung transplant genomic datasets. CONCLUSIONS: BAL anti-inflammatory macrophages may protect against CLAD by suppressing CD8 T cells. These populations merit functional and longitudinal assessment in additional cohorts.

Large-airway lymphocytic inflammation (LB), assessed on endobronchial biopsies, has been associated with acute cellular rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Azithromycin (AZI) prophylaxis has been used to prevent airway inflammation and subsequent CLAD, with inconsistent results. We hypothesized that AZI prophylaxis would be associated with reduced LB, changes in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) immune cell populations, and improved CLAD-free survival.

Methods

We compared frequencies of LB from endobronchial biopsies before (N = 1856) and after (N = 975) protocolized initiation of AZI prophylaxis at our center. LB was classified as none, minimal, mild, or moderate by histopathologic analysis. LB grades were compared using ordinal mixed-model regression. Corresponding automated BAL leukocyte frequencies were compared using mixed-effects modeling. The effect of AZI prophylaxis on CLAD-free survival was assessed by a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, transplant indication, and cytomegalovirus serostatus.

Results

Biopsies in the pre-AZI era had 2-fold increased odds (95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.7; P < 0.001) of higher LB grades. LB was associated with BAL neutrophilia in both eras. However, there was no difference in risk for CLAD or death between AZI eras (hazard ratio 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-2.0; P = 0.45).

Conclusions

Decreased airway inflammation in the era of AZI prophylaxis may represent a direct effect of AZI therapy or reflect other practices or environmental changes. In this cohort, AZI prophylaxis was not associated with improved CLAD-free survival.