Direct communication with the brain by brain-computer interfaces (BCI) has been one of the goals of neuroscience due to their potential therapeutic applications. It has been shown that animals, including humans, can learn to control the movement of prosthetic devices with BCI. The control, however, is far from smooth and precise control of the limbs of healthy individuals, and there is a need to further improve the performance of BCI.
One of the limitations of the previous studies is that they have been mainly targeting somatic activity of excitatory neurons, while different cell types possesses different functions in cortical computations and likely different capacities to control BCI. Here, we made a first step in addressing this issue by tracking the plastic changes of three major types of cortical inhibitory neurons (INs) during a BCI task using two-photon calcium imaging. Mice were rewarded when the activity of the positive target neuron (N+) exceeded that of the negative
target neuron (N-) beyond a set threshold. Mice improved the performance with all subtypes using subtype-specific strategies. When parvalbumin (PV)-expressing INs were targeted, the activity of N- decreased. However, targeting of somatostatin (SOM)- and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-expressing INs led to an increase of the N+ activity. These results demonstrate that INs can be individually modulated in a subtype-specific manner, and highlight the versatility of neural circuits in adapting to new demands by using cell-type specific strategies. Another potential limitation is that the mechanisms underlying BCI learning, and how the plasticity of the neurons contributes to learning has not been elucidated yet. In a motor learning task, it has been shown that dendritic spine dynamics and clustering are associated with learning, and nonlinear summation of excitatory inputs among nearby dendritic spines determine how the neuron responds. Does the spatial distribution of spines affect BCI learning? Does BCI training induce further spine formation and elimination? Answering those questions will help understanding the mechanisms of BCI learning. As a first step, here, I applied a modified neural feedback system to spine imaging and examined whether mice can learn to modulate spine-specific activity.
These are the first BCI tasks with lateral motion artifact correction. The implemented algorithms were presented with performance analysis.