A rule-plus-exception model of category
learning, RULEX (Nosofsky, Palmeri, &
McKinley, 1992), and an exemplar-based
connectionist model of category learning,
A L C O V E (Kxuschke, 1992), were evaluated on
their ability to predict the types of generalization
patterns exhibited by h u m a n subjects. Although
both models were able to predict the average
transfer data extremely well, each model had
difficulty predicting certain types of
generalizations shown by individual subjects. In
particular, RULEX accurately predicted the
prominence of rule-based generalizations,
whereas A L C O V E accurately predicted the
prominence of similarity-based generalizations.
A hybrid model, incorporating both rules and
similarity to exemplars, might best account for
category learning. Furthermore, a stochastic
learning rule, such as that used in RULEX ,
might be crucial for captiiring the different types
of generalizations patterns exhibited by
h u m a n s .