Purpose of Review: This article aims to discuss the structure and function of fascial systems and the potential role in myofascial pain syndromes. Recent Findings: New terminology differentiates anatomic structure (fascia) and function (fascial system), improving the conceptual framework and communication. Fascia has been shown to be innervated and biologically active and may have roles in nociception, proprioception, and myofascial force transmission. A number of factors may modify the function of fascial tissues through altering stiffness. A new cell type, “fasciacytes,” produces hyaluronic acid, a molecule critical to fascial lubrication. Fascial contribution to myofascial pain syndromes remains unclear, though plausible mechanisms connect them, and direct evidence of fascia-mediated pain exists. Current evidence is limited to support fascia-directed therapies for myofascial pain syndromes. Summary: Developing evidence implicates fascial tissue in musculoskeletal function and myofascial pain syndromes. Further investigation into fascial physiology and pathophysiology is needed to translate this knowledge into clinical care.

Objectives

To provide a descriptive analysis for species identification of culture and Gram stain results from ultrasound transducers and multiuse ultrasound transmission gel bottle tips in active clinical use and to compare bacterial cultures from ultrasound transducers before and after aseptic cleansing.

Methods

A prospective blinded descriptive analytic study of 18 distinct clinical care sites within a single primary clinical institution was conducted. Before and after a disinfectant towel cleanse, transducers were pressed against tryptic soy agar contact plates. Plates were deidentified and submitted for blind incubation, Gram staining, and species identification with microsequencing. Results were classified as clinically relevant (CR) or non-clinically relevant. In total, 188 samples were analyzed: 80 from ultrasound transducers before and cleansing, 13 from multiuse gel bottle tips before and after cleansing, and 2 precleansing samples from the data collector's pen and badge.

Results

Fifty-nine precleansing samples (73.8%) grew cultures with CR bacteria, and 21 samples (26.3%) did not. Staphylococcus simulans represented 31.0% of all positive culture samples. Thirteen postcleansing samples (16.3%) grew cultures with CR bacteria, equating to a 78.0% reduction of CR bacterial growth (likelihood ratio, 57.10; P < .001).

Conclusions

Ultrasound transducers have a notable CR bacterial burden and may serve as potential infective vectors. Aseptic cleansing effectively eliminates most of the bacterial load from ultrasound transducers, but some bacteria persist, presenting a risk of nosocomial infection with ultrasound-guided interventions. These findings support American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 2018 guidelines intended to ensure an appropriate level of transducer preparation based on the examination type while emphasizing rational infection control measures to minimize the risk of potential patient harm.

Isolated first rib stress fractures in athletes are thought to be rare. In this case series, 3 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes developed isolated first rib stress fractures over the span of 1 year, indicating that these injuries may occur more often than previously understood. These fractures can be easily missed because of the low incidence, lack of clinical suspicion, and vague presentation. Further, radiographs can fail to reveal such fractures. To our knowledge, this is the largest case series of athletes with first rib stress fractures presenting with vague rhomboid interscapular pain. We also demonstrated that ultrasound successfully visualized these injuries; in the hands of an ultrasonographer or clinical provider trained in musculoskeletal ultrasound, this technique offers an advantageous point-of-care screening imaging modality.