Attaching semantic meaning to sensory information received from both inside and outside our bodies is a fundamental function of the human brain. The theory of Controlled Semantic Cognition (CSC) proposes that the formation of semantic knowledge relies on connections between spatially distributed modality-specific spoke-nodes, and a modality-general hub in the anterior temporal lobes (ATLs). This theory can also be applied to social semantic knowledge, though certain domain-specific spoke-nodes may make a disproportionate contribution to the understanding of social concepts. The ATLs have strong connections with spoke-node structures such as the subgenual ACC (sgACC) and the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) that play an important role in predicting the hedonic value of stimuli. We hypothesized that in addition to the ATL semantic hub, a social semantic task would also require input from hedonic evaluation structures. We used voxel based morphometry (VBM) to examine structural brain-behavior relationships in 152 patients with neurodegeneration (Alzheimer's disease [N = 12], corticobasal syndrome (N = 18], progressive supranuclear palsy [N = 13], behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia [N = 56], and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) [N = 53]) using the Social Interaction Vocabulary Task (SIVT). This task measures the ability to correctly match a social term (e.g. "gossiping") with a visual depiction of that social interaction. As predicted, VBM showed that worse SIVT scores corresponded with volume loss in bilateral ATL semantic hub regions, but also in the sgACC, OFC, caudate and putamen (pFWE <0.05). These results support the CSC model of a hub-and-spoke organization of social semantic knowledge with the ATL as a domain-general semantic hub, and ventromedial and striatal structures as domain specific spoke-nodes. Importantly, these results suggest that correct comprehension of social semantic concepts requires emotional 'tagging' of a concept by the evaluation system, and that the social deficits observed in some neurodegenerative disease syndromes may be caused by the break-down of this mechanism.

Interpreting others' beliefs, desires and intentions is known as "theory of mind" (ToM), and is often evaluated using simplified measurement tools, which may not correctly reflect the brain circuits that are required for real-life ToM functioning. We aimed to identify the brain structures necessary to correctly infer intentions from realistic scenarios by administering The Awareness of Social Inference Test, Enriched subtest to 47 patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, 24 patients with progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome, 31 patients with Alzheimer's syndrome, and 77 older healthy controls. Neuroimaging data was analyzed using voxel based morphometry, and participants' understanding of intentions was correlated with voxel-wise and region-of interest data. We found that structural integrity of the cinguloinsular cortex in the salience network (SN) was more pivotal for accurate ToM than previously described, emphasizing the importance of the SN for selectively recognizing and attending to social cues during ToM inferences.

The intrinsic connectivity of the salience network (SN) plays an important role in social behavior, however the directional influence that individual nodes have on each other has not yet been fully determined. In this study, we used spectral dynamic causal modeling to characterize the effective connectivity patterns in the SN for 44 healthy older adults and for 44 patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) who have focal SN dysfunction. We examined the relationship of SN effective connections with individuals' socioemotional sensitivity, using the revised self-monitoring scale, an informant-facing questionnaire that assesses sensitivity to expressive behavior. Overall, average SN effective connectivity for bvFTD patients differs from healthy older adults in cortical, hypothalamic, and thalamic nodes. For the majority of healthy individuals, strong periaqueductal gray (PAG) output to right cortical (p < .01) and thalamic nodes (p < .05), but not PAG output to other central pattern generators contributed to sensitivity to socioemotional cues. This effect did not exist for the majority of bvFTD patients; PAG output toward other SN nodes was weak, and this lack of output negatively influenced socioemotional sensitivity. Instead, input to the left vAI from other SN nodes supported patients' sensitivity to others' socioemotional behavior (p < .05), though less effectively. The key role of PAG output to cortical and thalamic nodes for socioemotional sensitivity suggests that its core functions, that is, generating autonomic changes in the body, and moreover representing the internal state of the body, is necessary for optimal social responsiveness, and its breakdown is central to bvFTD patients' social behavior deficits.