Physicians of the future will be expected to synthesize new knowledge and appropriately apply it in patient care. Here, we report on the effects of and student attitudes towards resource-enhanced exams by comparing student performance on closed-book exams with or without access to pharmacology flashcards. Setting: the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) School of Medicine (SOM), class of 2021 (N = 149), followed over 4 years. We provided pharmacology flashcards for studying purposes in all blocks; flashcards were only accessible during closed-book exams in 2 of 5 blocks. We collected pharmacology open-ended question (OEQ) scores and analyzed results using repeated measures ANOVA (SPSS). We collected MS4 survey data using Qualtrics and conducted a thematic content analysis. Performance on pharmacology questions on exams was not higher with access to pharmacology flashcards during exams. The number of students who passed pharmacology questions without flashcards on exams was as follows: 137 ± 3.7, 132 ± 5.0, and 134 ± 7.9 (average ± SEM). The number of students who passed pharmacology questions with flashcards on exams was as follows: 132 ± 6.6 and 120 ± 7.5. Survey comments revealed several themes. Access to pharmacology flashcards during exams allowed learners to focus on understanding the bigger picture and reduced stress. A subset of students reported having access to flashcards on pre-clerkship exams hurt their preparation for clerkships. Flashcards as exam resources were received well by approximately half the class, who reported benefits including more time to focus on understanding bigger picture concepts and reduced stress.

Objective To describe a health equity curriculum created for pharmacy students and evaluate students' perceptions and structural competency after completion of the curriculum.Methods A health equity curriculum based on transformative learning and structural competency frameworks was implemented as a 10-week mandatory component of the pass-no pass neuropsychiatric theme for second year pharmacy students. Each week, students reviewed materials around a neuropsychiatric-related health equity topic and responded to discussion prompts through asynchronous forums or synchronous online video discussions. The effectiveness of the health equity curriculum was evaluated through assessment of structural competency through a validated instrument, an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), and a questionnaire.Results All enrolled second year pharmacy students (n=124) participated in the health equity curriculum. Of the 75 students who completed the structural competency instrument, 46 (61%) were able to identify structural determinants of health, explain how structures contribute to health disparities, or design structural interventions. Ninety-six of the 124 students (77%) were able to address their OSCE standardized patient's mistrust in the health care system. Thematic analysis of student comments elucidated three themes: allyship, peer connection, and self-awareness. Students rated asynchronous discussion forums as significantly less effective than online video discussions and patient cases for achieving curricular objectives.Conclusion A mandatory curriculum delivered remotely throughout the didactic pharmacy curriculum using a blended learning approach was an effective way to incorporate health equity content and conversations into existing courses. Implementation of this or similar curriculums could be an important step in training pharmacy students to be advocates for social justice.