- Kelly, John Daniel;
- Wannier, Sarah Rae;
- Sinai, Cyrus;
- Moe, Caitlin A;
- Hoff, Nicole A;
- Blumberg, Seth;
- Selo, Bernice;
- Mossoko, Mathais;
- Chowell-Puente, Gerardo;
- Jones, James Holland;
- Okitolonda-Wemakoy, Emile;
- Rutherford, George W;
- Lietman, Thomas M;
- Muyembe-Tamfum, Jean Jacques;
- Rimoin, Anne W;
- Porco, Travis C;
- Richardson, Eugene T
Background
Our understanding of the different effects of targeted versus nontargeted violence on Ebola virus (EBOV) transmission in Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is limited.Methods
We used time-series data of case counts to compare individuals in Ebola-affected health zones in DRC, April 2018-August 2019. Exposure was number of violent events per health zone, categorized into Ebola-targeted or Ebola-untargeted, and into civilian-induced, (para)military/political, or protests. Outcome was estimated daily reproduction number (Rt) by health zone. We fit linear time-series regression to model the relationship.Results
Average Rt was 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.11). A mean of 2.92 violent events resulted in cumulative absolute increase in Rt of 0.10 (95% CI, .05-.15). More violent events increased EBOV transmission (P = .03). Considering violent events in the 95th percentile over a 21-day interval and its relative impact on Rt, Ebola-targeted events corresponded to Rt of 1.52 (95% CI, 1.30-1.74), while civilian-induced events corresponded to Rt of 1.43 (95% CI, 1.21-1.35). Untargeted events corresponded to Rt of 1.18 (95% CI, 1.02-1.35); among these, militia/political or ville morte events increased transmission.Conclusions
Ebola-targeted violence, primarily driven by civilian-induced events, had the largest impact on EBOV transmission.